Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Expectant parents’ perceptions of healthcare and support during COVID-19 in the UK: A thematic analysis

View ORCID ProfileEzra Aydin, View ORCID ProfileKevin A. Glasgow, View ORCID ProfileStaci M. Weiss, View ORCID ProfileTopun Austin, View ORCID ProfileMark Johnson, View ORCID ProfileJane Barlow, View ORCID ProfileSarah Lloyd-Fox
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.14.21255490
Ezra Aydin
1Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK
2Autism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ezra Aydin
  • For correspondence: ea420{at}cam.ac.uk
Kevin A. Glasgow
3Department of Education, University of Cambridge, UK
MPhil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kevin A. Glasgow
Staci M. Weiss
1Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Staci M. Weiss
Topun Austin
4The Rosie Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
5NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Topun Austin
Mark Johnson
1Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mark Johnson
Jane Barlow
6Centre for Evidence-Based Intervention, Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, UK
DPhil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jane Barlow
Sarah Lloyd-Fox
1Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sarah Lloyd-Fox
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, expectant parents experienced changes in the availability and uptake of both NHS community and hospital-based healthcare.

Objective To examine how COVID-19 and its societal related restrictions have impacted the provision of healthcare support for pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Method A thematic analysis using an inductive approach was undertaken of data from open-ended responses using data from the national COVID in Context of Pregnancy, Infancy and Parenting (CoCoPIP) Study online survey (N = 507 families).

Results The overarching theme identified was the way in which the changes to healthcare provision increased parents’ anxiety levels, and feelings of not being supported. Five sub-themes, associated with the first wave of the pandemic, were identified: (1) rushed and/or fewer antenatal appointments, (2) lack of sympathy from healthcare workers, (3) lack of face-to-face appointments, (4) requirement to attend appointments without a partner, and (5) requirement to use PPE. A sentiment analysis, that used quantitative techniques, revealed participant responses to be predominantly negative (50.1%), with a smaller proportion of positive (21.8%) and neutral (28.1%) responses found.

Conclusion This study provides evidence indicating that the changes to healthcare services for pregnant women during the pandemic increased feelings of anxiety and have left women feeling inadequately supported. Our findings highlight the need for compensatory social and emotional support for new and expectant parents while COVID-19 related restrictions continue to impact on family life and society.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by a Medical Research Council Programme Grant MR/T003057/1 to MJ, and a UKRI Future Leaders fellowship (grant MR/S018425/1) to SLF. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the MRC or the UKRI. TA is supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

University of Cambridge, Psychology Research Ethics Committee (PREC) (PRE.2020.077)

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • ↵* Joint first authors

  • ↵** Joint senior authors

Data Availability

Data generated and analysed for this publication is not currently publicly available due to ethical and privacy restrictions.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 20, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Expectant parents’ perceptions of healthcare and support during COVID-19 in the UK: A thematic analysis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Expectant parents’ perceptions of healthcare and support during COVID-19 in the UK: A thematic analysis
Ezra Aydin, Kevin A. Glasgow, Staci M. Weiss, Topun Austin, Mark Johnson, Jane Barlow, Sarah Lloyd-Fox
medRxiv 2021.04.14.21255490; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.14.21255490
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Expectant parents’ perceptions of healthcare and support during COVID-19 in the UK: A thematic analysis
Ezra Aydin, Kevin A. Glasgow, Staci M. Weiss, Topun Austin, Mark Johnson, Jane Barlow, Sarah Lloyd-Fox
medRxiv 2021.04.14.21255490; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.14.21255490

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (430)
  • Allergy and Immunology (756)
  • Anesthesia (221)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3294)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (364)
  • Dermatology (280)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1171)
  • Epidemiology (13378)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (899)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5155)
  • Geriatric Medicine (482)
  • Health Economics (783)
  • Health Informatics (3271)
  • Health Policy (1141)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1191)
  • Hematology (431)
  • HIV/AIDS (1018)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14632)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (913)
  • Medical Education (477)
  • Medical Ethics (127)
  • Nephrology (523)
  • Neurology (4927)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (730)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (883)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2524)
  • Ophthalmology (725)
  • Orthopedics (281)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (543)
  • Pediatrics (1302)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (550)
  • Primary Care Research (557)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4214)
  • Public and Global Health (7506)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1706)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1014)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (480)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (498)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (548)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (236)
  • Urology (205)