ABSTRACT
Objectives This meta-analysis aims to 1) evaluate the efficacy of physical activity interventions in heart failure and 2) to identify intervention characteristics significantly associated with the interventions’ efficacy.
Methods Randomised controlled trials reporting intervention effects on physical activity in heart failure were combined in a meta-analysis using a random-effect model. Exploratory meta-analysis was performed by specifying the general approach (e.g. cardiac rehabilitation), strategies used (e.g. action planning), setting (e.g. centre-based), mode of delivery (e.g. face-to-face or online), facilitator (e.g. nurse), contact time, and behaviour change theory use as predictors in the random-effect model.
Results Interventions (n=21) had a significant overall effect (SMD = 0.54,95% CI: [0.13; 0.95], p < 0.005). Combining an exercise programme with behaviour change intervention was found efficacious (SMD = 1.26, 95% CI: [0.26; 2.26], p < 0.05). Centre-(SMD = 0.98, 95% CI: [0.35; 1.62],p < 0.001), and group-based (SMD = 0.89, 95 % CI: [0.29; 1.50],p < 0.001) delivery by a physiotherapist (SMD = 0.84, 95% CI: [0.03; 1.65]], p < 0.01) were significantly associated with efficacy. The following strategies were identified efficacious: prompts/cues (SMD = 3.29, 95% CI: [1.97; 4.62]), credible source (SMD=2.08, 95% CI:[0.95;3.22]), adding objects to the environment (SMD=1.47, 95% CI:[0.41;2.53]), generalisation of the target behaviour (SMD=1.32, 95% CI:[0.22;2.41]), monitoring of behaviour by others without feedback (SMD=1.02, 95% CI:[0.05;1.98]), self-monitoring of outcome(s) of behaviour (SMD=0.79, 95% CI:[0.06;1.52]), graded tasks (SMD=0.73, 95% CI:[0.22;1.24]), behavioural practice/rehearsal (SMD=0.72, 95% CI:[0.26;1.18]), action planning (SMD=0.62, 95% CI:[0.03;1.21]), and goal setting (behaviour) (SMD=0.56, 95% CI:[0.03;1.08]).
Conclusion The meta-analysis suggests intervention characteristics that may be suitable for promoting physical activity in heart failure. There is moderate evidence in support of an exercise programme combined with a behaviour change intervention delivered by a physiotherapist in a group- and centre-based settings.
What is already known about this subject?Individuals diagnosed with heart failure (HF) are advised to engage in physical activity. However, physical activity levels remain extremely low in this population group. Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) is routinely offered to newly diagnosed HF patients. CR is multifaceted; It is unknown which specific components result in physical activity improvements once the programme has ended. It is essential to understand how best to improve everyday physical activity engagement in HF.
What does this study add?This meta-analysis assessed what constitutes a successful physical activity intervention designed for individuals living with HF. The findings pinpoint specific intervention features and component that contribute to physical activity improvements in HF. Centre-based interventions that are delivered by a physiotherapist, in group format, that combine exercise with behaviour change intervention are promising for attaining physical activity improvements
How might this impact on clinical practice?The findings of this meta-analysis may inform physical activity intervention designed for individuals diagnosed with HF. There is a need for additional training for physiotherapists in delivering behaviour change interventions alongside an exercise programme that includes the identified efficacious strategies.
Note: all statistics are reported using Word Build-in: “Equation.”
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=15280
Funding Statement
Funding The review was supported by a City, University of London Postgraduate Studentship Grant
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This is an analysis of the findings from published articles (meta-analysis)
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data is available upon request
