Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

A survey of clinical opinions and preferences on the non-surgical management of intermittent exotropia in China

Yidong Wu, Tingting Peng, Jinjing Zhou, Meiping Xu, Yi Gao, View ORCID ProfileJiawei Zhou, Fang Hou, Xinping Yu
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.13.21255451
Yidong Wu
*The Eye Hospital, School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
†National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tingting Peng
*The Eye Hospital, School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
†National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jinjing Zhou
*The Eye Hospital, School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
†National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Meiping Xu
*The Eye Hospital, School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
†National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yi Gao
‡Wenzhou Medical University-Essilor International Research Center (WEIRC), Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiawei Zhou
*The Eye Hospital, School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
†National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jiawei Zhou
Fang Hou
*The Eye Hospital, School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
†National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xinping Yu
*The Eye Hospital, School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
†National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
§State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: yu-xinping@163.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose Intermittent exotropia (IXT) is the most common form of childhood exotropia. Currently, controversies exist regarding its management and non-surgical options in particular. This study reports clinical opinions and preferences on the non-surgical management among practitioners in China. The opinions within and between ophthalmologists and optometrists were also compared.

Design Cross-sectional survey study.

Methods An online survey was developed and distributed through professional bodies. The study was conducted from July 25th to August 3rd, 2019. A total of 300 ophthalmologists and 188 optometrists responded.

Results Of 488 participants, 257 (53%) considered fusion defects as the main cause of IXT, and 299 (61%) took IXT as a progressive disorder. Two hundred and seventy-one (56%) participants considered orthoptic exercises as the most effective non-surgical intervention for IXT. Likewise, 245 (50%) participants reported that orthoptic exercises was their most frequent non-surgical option, followed by observation (178, 37%). There are discrepancies between ophthalmologists and optometrists. A greater proportion of ophthalmologists (201, 67%) shared the view that IXT worsens over time compared with optometrists (98, 52%) (p = 0.001). Additionally, ophthalmologists (121, 40%) tended to prefer observation compared with optometrists (57, 30%) (p = 0.021).

Conclusions This study shows that there is no general consensus on the non-surgical management of IXT in China. Given the lack of robust evidence, the findings from this study not only show the current clinical opinions but also highlight the need for future randomized clinical trials to validate the effectiveness of non-surgical interventions, orthoptic exercises in particular, and to establish treatment guidelines accordingly.

Introduction

Intermittent exotropia (IXT) is the most common form of childhood strabismus in Asia1, 2, with an incidence rate of approximately 4% in China3, 4. If untreated, IXT may lead to loss of binocular vision and can induce psychosocial problems5-7. Conventionally, surgery is often the choice of intervention when there is poor control of an exodeviation8, 9. However, the surgical approach comes with a risk of persistent overcorrection (esotropia), which may result in diplopia, development of amblyopia, and reduction in stereopsis8. There is also evidence that the surgical benefits decline over time, with a strong tendency for recurrence10-12. In light of these concerns, non-surgical management, due to its noninvasive nature, has been recommended to defer or even avoid surgery13, 14. Current non-surgical options include observation15, part-time patching16, overminus lenses17, prisms18, and orthoptic exercises19. However, to date, there is not a clear understanding of which option benefits patients most. The optimal timing of interventions, the dose-response relationship and the long-term efficacy are also not clearly understood8, 13. Consequently, there is a dispute regarding the non-surgical management of IXT.

Three reasons motivated us to conduct this survey. First, the prevalence of IXT is dramatically higher in China than that in the Western countries (nearly 4:1)3, 4. This means that a greater number of people need medical care for IXT in China. It is, therefore, essential to clarify the current clinical opinion. Second, there are no official guidelines regarding the management of IXT in China. The choice of treatment option is often guided by practitioners’ previously held beliefs. Third, unlike the medical education system in the West, Chinese optometric education is also medically-based20-22. After gaining medical licenses, practitioners are assigned to perform as optometrists, specializing in refractive correction and primary eye care20, 21. Typically, the surgical management of IXT is conducted by ophthalmologists, and the non-surgical management of IXT is undertaken by both ophthalmologists and optometrists. We are interested in whether there are discrepancies in the management of IXT between these two groups of professionals.

We are not aware of any reports regarding the clinical opinions and preference on non-surgical management of IXT in China. Here, we conducted a survey to shed light on this topic. The opinions within and between ophthalmologists and optometrists were also compared.

Methods

The study conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University.

The initial survey questions were identified during discussions with an expert group consisting of three ophthalmologists and two optometrists. Subsequently, the questionnaire was validated with 20 practitioners at our institutes. Based on their responses and comments, the questions were amended. The final survey questions (Table 1) can be grouped into (1) professional role and characteristics (questions 1 - 4) and (2) clinical opinions and preferences (questions 5 - 9). The survey was made available online through Wenjuanxing (www.wjx.cn). The questionnaires were distributed through professional bodies (Chinese Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, National Ophthalmology & Optometry Alliance), personal contacts, and social media (WeChat) between July 25th, 2019, and August 3rd, 2019. Participants were not allowed to skip questions (i.e., each question had to be answered), while for some questions, an “other” option was available if the provided options did not match their policies. Participants were informed about the purpose of the survey and voluntary participation. Data were collected anonymously and did not contain identifying information. For statistical analysis, the Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used with an alpha value of 0.05 in SPSS, version 25.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and Bonferroni correction was applied if multiple comparisons were performed.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Survey questions

Results

A total of 488 practitioners responded. Because no report is available regarding how many practitioners in China provide strabismus management services, we cannot calculate exact response rate. According to the electronic database powered by http://www.haodf.com (the largest online healthcare community in China), there were 1251 active practitioners providing eye care services concerning strabismus at the time of the survey. Therefore, we achieved an estimated response rate of 39%.

Participants’ profile

The participants included 300 ophthalmologists and 188 optometrists. Of the 300 ophthalmologists, 206 (69%) had been in practice for more than ten years. Of the 188 optometrists, 96 (51%) had been in practice for more than ten years. One hundred and seventy-seven (59%) ophthalmologists reported that they examined more than ten patients per month, whereas 143 (76%) optometrists reported examining fewer than ten patients per month. Most participants (392, 80%) of both professionals reported that the age group of their patients was between 5∼12 years old.

Clinical impression

Possible Etiology

The factors that practitioners considered as the main cause of IXT are shown in Table 2. Of 488 participants, 257 (53%) considered fusion defects as the main cause of IXT, followed by abnormality of extraocular muscles (117, 24%), deficits of other cortical mechanisms (44, 9%) and orbital factors (1, 1%). Besides, 60 (12%) participants were uncertain about the main cause of IXT. Of nine participants who chose the option ‘Other’, five left specific responses: four gave answers in relation to refraction; one argued that IXT was a multifactorial disease without a primary cause. There was no significant difference between ophthalmologists and optometrists (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.214).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2. The factors that practitioners considered as the main cause of intermittent exotropia

Natural course

As shown in Table 3, 299 (61%) participants considered IXT as a progressive disorder. Only a small minority (5, 1%) held the view that IXT might improve over time in terms of the magnitude of exodeviation, control of exodeviation and (or) stereoacuity. A Fisher’s exact test indicated a significant difference between ophthalmologists and optometrists (p = 0.009). Compared with optometrists (98, 52%), a greater proportion of ophthalmologists (201, 67%) shared the view that IXT worsens over time (Chi-square test, χ2 = 10.77, p = 0.001).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3. The clinical impression of the natural course of intermittent exotropia

Non-surgical management

Effectiveness of non-surgical interventions

Among all the non-surgical interventions, orthoptic exercises were considered the most effective by both professionals (ophthalmologists, 161, 54%; optometrists, 110, 59%; Table 4). The choices of other interventions, including overminus lenses (6%), prisms (11%), part-time patching (2%), and botulinum toxin A injection (3%), showed a scattered pattern. Notably, 64 (13%) participants indicated that all non-surgical interventions were ineffective, and 47 (10%) participants claimed that they were uncertain about which one works more effectively. A Fisher’s exact test indicated that opinions differed significantly between ophthalmologists and optometrists (p = 0.001). Multiple comparisons found that (i) a greater proportion (32, 17%) of optometrists considered prisms as an effective intervention than that of ophthalmologists (22, 7%) (Chi-square test, χ2 = 11.11, p = 0.001), and that (ii) ophthalmologists (50, 17%) were more likely to feel that all these non-surgical interventions were ineffective compared with optometrists (14, 7%) (Chi-square test, χ2 = 8.62, p = 0.003).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 4. The practitioners’ opinions on the effectiveness of non-surgical interventions

The most frequent non-surgical management option

Subsequently, the practitioners were asked the most frequently applied non-surgical option in their practice other than the correction of refractive error. Likewise, both professionals reported orthoptic exercises as the most frequent option (ophthalmologists, 144, 48%; optometrists, 101, 54%), followed by observation (ophthalmologists, 121, 40%; optometrists, 57, 30%; Table 5). Apart from orthoptic exercises and observation, all other management options were rarely chosen (sum = 13%, 65/488). Two ophthalmologists chose “Other” and left detailed responses. Their responses were similar to observations (i.e., do not take any specific intervention unless the surgery was needed). Therefore, we merged them into the category “Observation” for analyses. A Fisher’s exact test indicated a significant difference between ophthalmologists and optometrists (p = 0.024). We then conducted multiple comparisons. Compared with optometrists (57, 30%), ophthalmologists (121, 40%) tended to prefer observation. (Chi-square test, χ2 = 8.62, p = 0.021, a = 0.008).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 5. The practitioners’ most frequent non-surgical options for patients with intermittent exotropia

Early surgery to gain superior sensory outcomes

In the last question, the participants were asked whether they agreed with the idea regarding early surgery to gain superior sensory outcomes of four perspectives: (i) surgery at a younger age; (ii) surgery within the critical period; (iii) surgery after a shorter duration of strabismus; and (iv) surgery while the severity of IXT increases in terms of either angle of exodeviation or control of exodeviation or stereoacuity. Their responses are shown in Table 6. Most participants (449, 92%) agreed with perspective (iv), whereas opinions varied on perspectives (i) ∼ (iii). Compared with the optometrists, fewer ophthalmologists agreed with the idea from perspectives (i) ∼ (iii) (Chi-square test, χ2 = 8.919, p = 0.003; χ2 = 6.936, p = 0.009; χ2 = 10.794, p = 0.001; respectively).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 6. The practitioners’ opinions regarding early surgery for intermittent exotropia

Additional analysis

Whether a relationship between the clinical impression (Table 2, 3) and the choice of management option (Table 5) is of great interest. Since a vast majority of participants reported orthoptic exercises (50%) and observation (37%) as their most frequent management option (Table 5), we included these two options for further investigation. We tested two plausible hypotheses: (i) Participants who considering IXT as a disorder mainly caused by fusion defects would prefer orthoptic exercises than other management options and (ii) Participants who holding the view that IXT worsens over time were more prone to intervention rather than observation.

Among 257 participants who taking fusion defects as the main cause of IXT, 142 (55%) reported orthoptic exercises as the most frequent non-surgical management option. This rate was significantly higher than that (103, 45%) of participants who considering other factors as the main cause of IXT (Chi-square test, χ2 = 5.534, p = 0.019).

Of 299 participants who taking IXT as a progressive disorder, 113 (38%) reported observation as their most frequent option. This rate was not significantly different from that (67, 35%) of participants who holding other views on the natural course of IXT (Chi-square test, χ2 = 0.273, p = 0.601).

Discussion

In this survey study, we aimed to show the opinions of practitioners rather than to provide a Preferred Practice Pattern or an Expert Consensus. Our results demonstrated both consistencies and discrepancies regarding the non-surgical management of IXT among practitioners in China. We showed that both ophthalmologists and optometrists considered orthoptic exercises as most effective non-surgical intervention. Likewise, both professionals chose orthoptic exercises as their most frequent non-surgical management option, followed by observation. We found that a greater proportion of ophthalmologists shared the view that IXT worsens over time and tended to prefer observation.

The preference for orthoptic exercises may reflect the reality in a broader Asian area. In a Hong Kong cohort of 117 children with IXT, Kwok et al. reported that orthoptic exercise was taught to all of their patients23. In an Israeli survey, 66% (37) of the respondents reported that they used orthoptic exercises for IXT treatment, a percentage higher than that of respondents using part-time patching (52%, 29) and overminus lenses (48%, 27)24.

It is likely that our findings, especially the preference for orthoptic exercises, are different from the ophthalmologists’ practice pattern in Western countries. In 1990, a survey of members of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) showed that 31 (48%) of the respondents rarely or never used non-surgical interventions25. Of the 34 (52%) respondents who routinely used one or more non-surgical techniques, a majority chose part-time patching (46%) and minus lenses (34%) as the most frequent interventions. In contrast, orthoptic exercises were less frequently used (14%)25. In a cohort study of 460 children with IXT between May 2005 and December 2006 in the United Kingdom, Buck and her colleagues reported that 65% (297) of the children had no specific treatment (i.e., observation) within the first year of diagnosis26. Among the 36 (8%) children who received non-surgical interventions other than correction of refractive error, the treatment methods were overminus lenses (21), part-time patching (10) and orthoptic exercises (5)26. The aforementioned two studies indicated that observation, part-time patching and overminus lenses were more popular non-surgical management options than orthoptic exercises in Western countries. Indeed, it has been suggested that orthoptic exercises in the management of IXT had been on the decline13, 27, 28. This decline might be due to the surgeons’ critical attitude towards the role of orthoptic exercises, namely, it has not been proven that orthoptic exercises would provide a benefit when combined with surgeries, or that orthoptic exercises could replace surgeries13, 28, 29.

Our survey cannot directly reveal the underlying reasons for the preference for orthoptic exercises. Why do our participants prefer orthoptic exercises rather than other management options? Two possible explanations are discussed here. First, the choice of orthoptic exercises is consistent with the participants’ held beliefs. As shown in Table 2, most practitioners considered IXT to be a disorder caused by fusion defects (53%). Theoretically, orthoptic exercises increase fusional vergence ranges and normalize sensory fusion, thereby facilitating exotropia control13. Our Additional analysis further supports this explanation. Second, we speculate that a historical reason might contributed to the preference for orthoptic exercises. Optometry, as an emerging discipline in China since the 1980s, was established by Chinese ophthalmologists with support from American optometrists20-22. This enables a unique cooperation between ophthalmology and optometry in China. It has been suggested that orthoptic exercises are favored by American optometrists in the management of IXT28. In Rutstein and Corliss’ cohort of 73 patients with IXT, 82% (60/73) of patients had non-surgical treatment, with 49% (36/73) having orthoptic exercises30.

Overall, the indication and effectiveness of non-surgical interventions have not been established8, 13. Most published reports comprised retrospective studies from single institutions. In Coffey et al.’s general review of treatments for IXT, the pooled success rates were as follows: overminus lenses (n = 215), 28%; prism (n=201), 28%; part-time patching (n=170), 37%; orthoptic exercises (n=740), 59%; surgery (n=2530), 46%31. Caution should be taken when interpreting these results because there are great variations in the criteria for “success” among the authors (e.g., follow-up periods, the magnitude of deviation), as well as in the sample selection criteria. Recently, the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (PEDIG) conducted a series of randomized clinical trials to validate the effectiveness of non-surgical management options, including part-time patching16, overminus lenses17 and observation15. PEDIG found that patients who received non-surgical interventions, either part-time patching16 or overminus lenses17, gained slight benefits in a short-term period (six months for part-time patching, eight weeks for overminus lenses). However, they also found that deterioration was uncommon over a 3-year observational period in 3- to 10-year-old children with IXT15. Put differently, it’s unconvincing to recommend one treatment option over the others if the treatment rationale for IXT is “preventing deterioration”.

In the survey, we included a question regarding surgical indication (Table 6). The reason is that surgical indication is a critical topic during the non-surgical management and may help to explain the non-surgical practice pattern. Since there is a long-existing debate concerning whether earlier surgery can achieve superior sensory outcomes for patients with IXT32-36, we narrowed our question into this scope of four perspectives (see Table 5 for details). Only a minority of participants agree with the view that surgery at a younger age (19%) or after a shorter duration (23%) might achieve superior sensory outcomes. These findings suggested that most of the practitioners were likely to apply non-surgical option first when managing their patients. Therefore, non-surgical procedure is a large component in the management of IXT.

Our study has limitations. First, we could not calculate the exact response rate due to the recruitment method. There was also no previously published survey in this population that we could use for comparison. However, this study is likely to be a good representation because we were privileged to contact as many practitioners as possible with support from the National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases and several professional bodies. Second, like all survey-based analyses, our results represented opinions, which might not necessarily agree with actual behaviors. Third, our study only questioned the “most frequency” option, which limited our ability to determine the frequency of each management option. This choice of question form was because we wanted to make the questionnaire brief so that more practitioners might respond. In addition, the discrepancies between ophthalmologists and optometrists revealed in this study should be interpreted with caution. It is possible that the patients who turned to ophthalmologists were severer cases.

In conclusion, our study showed that although a majority of practitioners reported orthoptic exercises as most frequent non-surgical option, there was no general consensus among practitioners concerning the non-surgical management of IXT in China. Given the high prevalence of IXT in the Asian population1-4 and the lack of robust evidence, our findings emphasize the need for future randomized controlled trials in Asian area to determine the effectiveness of non-surgical interventions, and to establish treatment guidelines for IXT accordingly.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (XY) upon request request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the participants who took part in the survey. We are also grateful to the following professional bodies for their kind assistance: Chinese Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, National Ophthalmology & Optometry Alliance.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None

  • Financial support: This study was supported by the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China LY19H120004 and the Medical Health Science and Technology Project of the Zhejiang Provincial Health Commission 2019KY110 to XY. The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Yu CB, Fan DS, Wong VW, et al. Changing patterns of strabismus: a decade of experience in Hong Kong. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86(8): 854–856.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Chia A, Roy L, Seenyen L. Comitant horizontal strabismus: an Asian perspective. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91(10): 1337–1340.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Fu J, Li SM, Liu LR, et al. Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in a population of 7th- grade junior high school students in Central China: the Anyang Childhood Eye Study (ACES). Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2014;21(3): 197–203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Pan CW, Zhu H, Yu JJ, et al. Epidemiology of Intermittent Exotropia in Preschool Children in China. Optom Vis Sci 2016;93(1): 57–62.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    Paysse EA, Steele EA, McCreery KMB, et al. Age of the emergence of negative attitudes toward strabismus. J AAPOS 2001;5(6): 361–366.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.
    Mojon-Azzi SM, Kunz A, Mojon DS. Strabismus and discrimination in children: are children with strabismus invited to fewer birthday parties?Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95(4): 473– 476.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Wang Y, Xu M, Yu H, et al. Health-related quality of life correlated with the clinical severity of intermittent exotropia in children. Eye (Lond) 2019.
  8. 8.↵
    Hatt SR, Gnanaraj L. Interventions for intermittent exotropia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;5(5): CD003737.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Yu X, Ji Z, Yu H, et al. Exotropia Is the Main Pattern of Childhood Strabismus Surgery in the South of China: A Six-Year Clinical Review. J Ophthalmol 2016;2016: 1489537.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    Oh JY, Hwang JM. Survival analysis of 365 patients with exotropia after surgery. Eye (Lond) 2006;20(11): 1268–1272.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.
    Pineles SL, Ela-Dalman N, Zvansky AG, et al. Long-term results of the surgical management of intermittent exotropia. J AAPOS 2010;14(4): 298–304.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Holmes JM, Hatt SR, Leske DA. Is intermittent exotropia a curable condition?Eye (Lond) 2015;29(2): 171–176.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    Piano M, O’Connor AR. Conservative management of intermittent distance exotropia: a review. Am Orthopt J 2011;61(1): 103–116.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Kushner BJ. Conservative management of intermittent exotropia to defer or avoid surgery. J AAPOS 2019.
  15. 15.↵
    Mohney BG, Cotter SA, Chandler DL, et al. Three-year Observation of Children Age 3 to 10 Years Old with Untreated Intermittent Exotropia. Ophthalmology 2019.
  16. 16.↵
    Cotter SA, Mohney BG, Chandler DL, et al. A randomized trial comparing part-time patching with observation for children 3 to 10 years of age with intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmology 2014;121(12): 2299–2310.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    Chen AM, Holmes JM, Chandler DL, et al. A Randomized Trial Evaluating Short-term Effectiveness of Overminus Lenses in Children 3 to 6 Years of Age with Intermittent Exotropia. Ophthalmology 2016;123(10): 2127–2136.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    Samy El Gendy NM, Abdel Nabi E. Is Inverse Prism Therapy Comparable to Conventional Prism Therapy for Improving Newcastle Scores in Patients with Basic Intermittent Exotropia?Semin Ophthalmol 2019;34(7-8): 497–503.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    Ma MM, Kang Y, Scheiman M, et al. Office-based Vergence and Accommodative Therapy for the Treatment of Intermittent Exotropia: A Pilot Study. Optom Vis Sci 2019;96(12): 925– 933.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    Woo GC, Lin Z. Development of optometry in the People’s Republic of China. Clin Exp Optom 2020.
  21. 21.↵
    Heath DA. Optometry education in China: Local needs, global interests. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2000;02(1): 5–10.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    Lu F, Chen W, Li M, et al. From Establishing a World-Renowned Eye Institute to Integrating Ophthalmology and Optometry in China: The Story of The Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2021;10(2): 135–141.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    Kwok JJ, Chong GS, Ko ST, et al. The Natural Course of Intermittent Exotropia over a 3- year Period and the Factors Predicting the Control Deterioration. Sci Rep 2016;6: 27113.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    Barnett-Itzhaki G, Friehmann A, Barnett-Itzhaki Z, et al. Diagnosis and Management Practice Patterns among Pediatric Ophthalmology Personnel in Israel. J Binocul Vis Ocul Motil 2019;69(1): 34–41.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Campos EC, ed.
    Romano PE, Wilson MF. Survey of Current Management of Intermittent Exotropia in the USA and Canada. In: Campos EC, ed. Strabismus and Ocular Motility Disorders: Proceedings of the Sixth Meeting of the International Strabismological Association Surfers Paradise, Australia, 1990. London: Macmillan Education UK; 1990:391–396.
  26. 26.↵
    Buck D, Powell C, Cumberland P, et al. Presenting features and early management of childhood intermittent exotropia in the UK: inception cohort study. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93(12): 1620–1624.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    Tibbs A. Orthoptic treatment of constant and intermittent exotropia. Am Orthopt J 1978;28: 117.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Hodgetts DJ. Under-Corrected and Recurrent Exotropia. Am Orthopt J 2003;53(1): 39–44.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    Knapp P. Intermittent exotropia: evaluation and therapy. Am Orthopt J 1953;3: 27–33.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Rutstein RP, Corliss DA. The clinical course of intermittent exotropia. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80(9): 644.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    Coffey B, Wick B, Cotter S, et al. Treatment options in intermittent exotropia: a critical appraisal. Optom Vis Sci 1992;69(5): 386–404.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    Pratt-Johnson JA, Barlow JM, Tillson G. Early surgery in intermittent exotropia. Am J Ophthalmol 1977;84(5): 689–694.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.
    Richard JM, Parks MM. Intermittent exotropia. Surgical results in different age groups. Ophthalmology 1983;90(10): 1172–1177.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.
    Baker JD, Schweers M, Petrunak J, et al. Is “Earlier” Surgery a Sensory Benefit in the Treatment of Intermittent Exotropia. Am Orthopt J 1999;49(1): 88–91.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.
    Abroms AD, Mohney BG, Rush DP, et al. Timely surgery in intermittent and constant exotropia for superior sensory outcome. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;131(1): 111–116.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    Wu H, Sun J, Xia X, et al. Binocular status after surgery for constant and intermittent exotropia. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142(5): 822–826.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 20, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A survey of clinical opinions and preferences on the non-surgical management of intermittent exotropia in China
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A survey of clinical opinions and preferences on the non-surgical management of intermittent exotropia in China
Yidong Wu, Tingting Peng, Jinjing Zhou, Meiping Xu, Yi Gao, Jiawei Zhou, Fang Hou, Xinping Yu
medRxiv 2021.04.13.21255451; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.13.21255451
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A survey of clinical opinions and preferences on the non-surgical management of intermittent exotropia in China
Yidong Wu, Tingting Peng, Jinjing Zhou, Meiping Xu, Yi Gao, Jiawei Zhou, Fang Hou, Xinping Yu
medRxiv 2021.04.13.21255451; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.13.21255451

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Ophthalmology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (174)
  • Allergy and Immunology (419)
  • Anesthesia (97)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (894)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (166)
  • Dermatology (101)
  • Emergency Medicine (257)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (404)
  • Epidemiology (8745)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (403)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1845)
  • Geriatric Medicine (175)
  • Health Economics (386)
  • Health Informatics (1282)
  • Health Policy (642)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (489)
  • Hematology (206)
  • HIV/AIDS (387)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10521)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (564)
  • Medical Education (193)
  • Medical Ethics (52)
  • Nephrology (216)
  • Neurology (1744)
  • Nursing (100)
  • Nutrition (264)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (342)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (457)
  • Oncology (959)
  • Ophthalmology (279)
  • Orthopedics (107)
  • Otolaryngology (174)
  • Pain Medicine (117)
  • Palliative Medicine (41)
  • Pathology (262)
  • Pediatrics (553)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (264)
  • Primary Care Research (218)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1836)
  • Public and Global Health (3963)
  • Radiology and Imaging (649)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (340)
  • Respiratory Medicine (532)
  • Rheumatology (214)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (178)
  • Sports Medicine (165)
  • Surgery (196)
  • Toxicology (37)
  • Transplantation (105)
  • Urology (78)