Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Sensitivity of rapid antigen testing and RT-PCR performed on nasopharyngeal swabs versus saliva samples in COVID-19 hospitalized patients: results of a prospective comparative trial (RESTART)

Antonios Kritikos, Giorgia Caruana, René Brouillet, John-Paul Miroz, Abed-Maillard Samia, Stieger Geraldine, Onya Opota, Antony Croxatto, Peter Vollenweider, Pierre-Alexandre Bart, Jean-Daniel Chiche, Gilbert Greub
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.09.21255105
Antonios Kritikos
1Institute of Microbiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giorgia Caruana
1Institute of Microbiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
René Brouillet
1Institute of Microbiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John-Paul Miroz
2Intensive Care Unit, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abed-Maillard Samia
2Intensive Care Unit, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stieger Geraldine
2Intensive Care Unit, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Onya Opota
1Institute of Microbiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antony Croxatto
1Institute of Microbiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Vollenweider
3Service of Internal Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pierre-Alexandre Bart
3Service of Internal Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Daniel Chiche
2Intensive Care Unit, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gilbert Greub
1Institute of Microbiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gilbert.greub@chuv.ch
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives Saliva sampling could serve as an alternative non-invasive sample for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis while rapid antigen testing (RAT) might help to mitigate the shortage of reagents sporadically encountered with RT-PCR. Thus, in the RESTART study we compared antigen and RT-PCR testing methods on nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs and salivary samples.

Methods We conducted a prospective observational study among COVID-19 hospitalized patients between 10th December 2020 and 1st February 2021. Paired saliva and NP samples were investigated by RT-PCR (Cobas 6800, Roche-Switzerland) and by two rapid antigen tests: One Step Immunoassay Exdia® COVID-19 Ag (Precision Biosensor, Korea) and Standard Q® COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test (Roche-Switzerland).

Results A total of 58 paired NP-saliva specimens were collected. Thirty-two of 58 (55%) patients were hospitalized in the intensive care unit and the median duration of symptoms was 11 days (IQR 5-19). NP and salivary RT-PCR exhibited sensitivity of 98% and 69% respectively whereas the specificity of these RT-PCRs assays were of 100%. NP RAT exhibited much lower diagnostic performances with sensitivities of 35% and 41% for the Standard Q® and Exdia® assays respectively, when a wet-swab approach was used (i.e. when the swab was diluted in the viral transport medium (VTM) before testing). The sensitivity of the dry-swab approach was slightly better (47%). These antigen tests exhibited very low sensitivity (4 and 8%) when applied to salivary swabs.

Conclusions Nasopharyngeal RT-PCR is the most accurate test for COVID-19 diagnosis in hospitalized patients. RT-PCR on salivary samples may be used when nasopharyngeal swabs are contraindicated. RAT are not appropriate for hospitalized patients.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

NCT04839094

Funding Statement

This study was funded by the funds of the Microbiology Institute of Lausanne University Hospital.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethics Committee of the Canton de Vaud (CER-VD).

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data will be available upon reasonable request to the authors.

  • Abbreviations

    NP
    Nasopharyngeal
    RT-PCR
    Real time polymerase chain reaction
    POCT
    Rapid Point-of-Care Test
    RAT
    Rapid Antigen Test
    VTM
    Viral Transport Medium
    ICU
    Intensive Care Unit
    FOPH
    Federal Office of Public Health
    VL
    Viral Load
    Ct
    Cycle threshold
    IQR
    Interquartile range
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted April 15, 2021.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Sensitivity of rapid antigen testing and RT-PCR performed on nasopharyngeal swabs versus saliva samples in COVID-19 hospitalized patients: results of a prospective comparative trial (RESTART)
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Sensitivity of rapid antigen testing and RT-PCR performed on nasopharyngeal swabs versus saliva samples in COVID-19 hospitalized patients: results of a prospective comparative trial (RESTART)
    Antonios Kritikos, Giorgia Caruana, René Brouillet, John-Paul Miroz, Abed-Maillard Samia, Stieger Geraldine, Onya Opota, Antony Croxatto, Peter Vollenweider, Pierre-Alexandre Bart, Jean-Daniel Chiche, Gilbert Greub
    medRxiv 2021.04.09.21255105; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.09.21255105
    Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Sensitivity of rapid antigen testing and RT-PCR performed on nasopharyngeal swabs versus saliva samples in COVID-19 hospitalized patients: results of a prospective comparative trial (RESTART)
    Antonios Kritikos, Giorgia Caruana, René Brouillet, John-Paul Miroz, Abed-Maillard Samia, Stieger Geraldine, Onya Opota, Antony Croxatto, Peter Vollenweider, Pierre-Alexandre Bart, Jean-Daniel Chiche, Gilbert Greub
    medRxiv 2021.04.09.21255105; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.09.21255105

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (175)
    • Allergy and Immunology (421)
    • Anesthesia (97)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (901)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (171)
    • Dermatology (102)
    • Emergency Medicine (257)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (407)
    • Epidemiology (8794)
    • Forensic Medicine (4)
    • Gastroenterology (405)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1864)
    • Geriatric Medicine (179)
    • Health Economics (388)
    • Health Informatics (1292)
    • Health Policy (644)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (493)
    • Hematology (207)
    • HIV/AIDS (396)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10575)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (564)
    • Medical Education (193)
    • Medical Ethics (52)
    • Nephrology (218)
    • Neurology (1762)
    • Nursing (104)
    • Nutrition (267)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (343)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (461)
    • Oncology (966)
    • Ophthalmology (283)
    • Orthopedics (107)
    • Otolaryngology (177)
    • Pain Medicine (118)
    • Palliative Medicine (43)
    • Pathology (265)
    • Pediatrics (557)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (266)
    • Primary Care Research (221)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1846)
    • Public and Global Health (3992)
    • Radiology and Imaging (655)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (344)
    • Respiratory Medicine (536)
    • Rheumatology (216)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (178)
    • Sports Medicine (166)
    • Surgery (197)
    • Toxicology (37)
    • Transplantation (107)
    • Urology (80)