Abstract
Objective As tap water distrust has grown in the US with greater distrust among Black and Hispanic households, we aimed to examine the most recent trends in not drinking tap water including the period covering the US Flint Water Crisis and racial/ethnic disparities in these trends.
Design, Setting, and Participants We analyzed data from the cross-sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data (2011–2018) for 9,439 children aged 2-19 and 17,268 adults. Log-binomial regressions and marginal predicted probabilities examined US nationally-representative trends in tap water consumption overall and by race/ethnicity.
Results Among US children and adults, respectively, in 2017–2018 there was a 63% (adjusted prevalence ratio [PR]:1.63, 95% CI: 1.25-2.12, p<0.001) and 40% (PR:1.40, 95% CI: 1.16-1.69, p=0.001) higher prevalence of not drinking tap water compared to 2013–2014 (pre-Flint Water Crisis). For Black children and adults, the probability of not drinking tap water increased significantly from 18.1% (95% CI: 13.4-22.8) and 24.6% (95% CI: 20.7-28.4) in 2013–14 to 29.3% (95% CI: 23.5-35.1) and 34.5% (95% CI: 29.4-39.6) in 2017–2018. Among Hispanic children and adults, not drinking tap water increased significantly from 24.5% (95% CI: 19.4-29.6) and 27.1% (95% CI: 23.0-31.2) in 2013–14 to 39.7% (95% CI: 32.7-46.8) and 38.1% (95% CI: 33.0-43.1) in 2017–2018. No increases were observed among white children and adults.
Conclusions Approximately 20% of US children and adults did not drink tap water post-Flint Water Crisis in 2017-2018. Black and Hispanics’ probability of not drinking tap water continued to increase compared to whites.
Introduction
Approximately two million Americans lack basic access to drinking water1. However, this figure does not capture individuals who have access but do not drink their tap water. Not drinking tap water occurs for many reasons, including aesthetic considerations or distrust due to water quality violations in homes2 or schools3. The Flint, Michigan Water Crisis4, in which the Flint community was exposed to high concentrations of lead in their water from 2015 through 2016 raised national awareness5 of tap water safety concerns in US communities2,6. Then, Newark, New Jersey reported a lead crisis in 20167 further stoking fears. Both Flint and Newark are comprised predominantly of non-white residents.
Other households in the US lack consistent access to tap water at home because of water shutoffs due to affordability issues8, which disproportionately affect residents in low-income housing, and Black and Hispanic households9,10. The differential treatment of individuals in these categories increases exposure to environmental injustice and racism11 which may affect both access to and use of tap water. Consequently, these groups are also more likely to drink bottled water12 and sugar-sweetened beverages13,14 that are more costly15 and lack the protective benefits of fluoride16 in tap water.
While previous work documented an increase in US children not drinking tap water in 2015-201612 during the Flint Water Crisis compared to prior years, it is critical to surveil this important health behavior as a way to monitor trust and usage of tap water. Therefore, we examined whether not drinking tap water in the US continued to increase in 2017-2018 by analyzing nationally-representative trends among children/adolescents and adults, and whether disparities in this behavior persisted by race/ethnicity.
Methods
Data come from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)17, a cross-sectional survey of the civilian, non-institutionalized population, which uses a complex, multistage probability design. Detailed sampling procedures and methodology are described elsewhere18. NHANES is conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) and approved by their research ethics board. Children aged 7-17 years provided assent and parents provided consent for children under 18; adults consented for themselves.
This analysis uses the four most recent two-year cycles (2011–2018) because oversampling of non-Hispanic (NH) Asians began in 2011-12 allowing for an examination of this population’s trends in tap water consumption, and because prior work already examined trends in Black, Hispanic and White tap water consumption from 2007-201612. Response rates ranged from 77.0% in 2011–12 to 54.6% in 2017–18 for the examination component for youth aged 1-19 years, and from 64.5% in 2011–12 to 45.3% in 2017–18 for adults aged 20+.
To assess the prevalence of not drinking tap water, we analyzed responses to the dietary recall question: “When you drink tap water, what is the main source of the tap water?” If respondents reported not drinking tap water, they were coded as “did not drink tap.” All others were coded as “drank tap water”16,19. A proxy responded to interview questions for children aged ≤5 years; interviews for children aged 6–11 years were conducted with proxy assistance while children aged ≥12 years responded themselves. If they responded that they did not know their primary source, they were excluded from analyses.
For robustness analyses, we analyzed day-one 24-hour dietary recall data and dichotomized tap water consumption and bottled water consumption as >0 ml or 0 ml following prior work13. This allowed for a comparison of consumption on a given day to self-reports of not drinking water from their main source of tap and if not drinking tap water shifted consumption to bottled water.
Statistical analyses
A 2-sided P-value of .05 was used to assess statistical significance. Multiple log-binomial regression models were estimated since prevalence of not drinking tap was >10%12. As there were no significant race/ethnicity by survey cycle interactions (all p>0.05), we estimated the regressions and covariate-adjusted time-trends without interaction terms. We used the 2013-14 survey cycle as the reference category as it was the last cycle prior to the Flint Water Crisis. We plotted trends from the log-binomial regressions using marginal standardization20 to generate predicted probabilities by self-reported race/ethnicity (white, Black, Asian, Hispanic, or other).
We adjusted for the range21 of the following covariates: age (2-5, 6-11, 12-19, 20-39, 40-59, 60+), sex, federal income to poverty ratio (FIPR; ratio of family income to the federal poverty guideline22: ≤130%, 131-350%, >350%), household reference educational attainment (for children/adolescents; high school graduate/GED equivalent and some college were released combined) and educational attainment (for adults), and whether respondents were born in the US or not12,19.
As robustness analyses, we re-estimated log-binomial regressions models as described above with the dichotomized outcome of not drinking any tap water (0 ml) on a given day using the 24-hour dietary recall. We repeated this analysis with the dichotomized outcome of any (>0 ml) bottled water intake.
All analyses accounted for the complex survey design, including day-one dietary sample weights, which adjusted for oversampling, non-response, non-coverage, and day of week18,23 and incorporated guidelines from NCHS24. Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata V15.1 (Statacorp, College Station, TX).
Results
Data for the primary analyses were analyzed for 9,439 children and 17,268 adults with complete covariate information (Table 1). Among children/adolescents and adults, respectively, in the post-Flint period (2017–2018) there was a 63% (adjusted prevalence ratio [PR]:1.63, 95%CI:1.25-2.12, p<0.001) and 40% (PR:1.40, 95%CI:1.16-1.69, p=0.001) higher prevalence of not drinking tap water compared to pre-Flint (2013–2014), respectively (Figure 1a-b; Supplemental Table 1: Models 1-2). Overall, the probability of not drinking tap increased significantly from 12.3% (95%CI:9.5-15.0) and 13.9% (95%CI:11.8-16.0) among children and adults, respectively in 2013–2014 to 19.9% (95%CI:16.0-23.8) and 19.5% (95%CI:16.5-22.5) in 2017–2018.
Hispanic, Black, and Asian children/adolescents and adults had significantly higher prevalence of not drinking tap than white persons (all p<0.001, Figure 1a-1b; Supplemental Table 1: Models 1-2). Lower income, less educational attainment, and being born outside the US were associated with higher prevalence of not drinking tap water (Figure 1a-1b).
Covariate-adjusted trends by race/ethnicity of not drinking tap water are presented in Figure 2a-2b. Among Black children/adolescents and adults, the probability of not drinking tap water increased significantly from 18.1% (95CI:13.4-22.8) and 24.6% (95%CI:20.7-28.4) in 2013–14 to 29.3% (95%CI:23.5-35.1) and 34.5% (95%CI:29.4-39.6) in 2017–18, respectively. Among Hispanic children/adolescents and adults, not drinking tap increased from 24.5% (95%CI:19.4-29.6) and 27.1% (95%CI:23.0-31.2) in 13-14 to 39.7% (95%CI:32.7-46.8) and 38.1% (95%CI:33.0-43.1) in 2017–2018, respectively (Figure 2a-2b).
Robustness analysis
In robustness analyses, we used data from 10,254 children/adolescents and 17,829 adults with valid dietary recall data, slightly more than the primary analyses due to fewer missing responses. Results of the log-binomial regressions examining not drinking tap water on a given day were slightly attenuated but largely consistent with main analyses (Supplemental Table 2). Overall for children/adolescents and adults, the prevalence of not drinking tap water was 14.0% (PR=1.14; 95%CI:0.98-1.33) and 12.6% (PR=1.13; 95%CI:1.01-1.25) higher in 2017-2018 than 2013-2014. As in primary analyses, Black and Hispanic children/adolescents and adults had significantly higher prevalence of not drinking any tap water on a given day than white persons (Supplemental Table 2, Models 1-2).
In the second analysis, prevalence of any bottled water consumption on a given day was significantly higher overall for both children (PR: 1.26; 95%CI:1.12-1.41) and adults (PR: 1.25; 95%CI:1.12-1.40) in 2017-18 than in 2013-14. Further, Black, Asian, and Hispanic persons all had higher prevalence of drinking bottled water than white children and adults, respectively (Supplemental Table 3, Models 1-2).
Discussion
This study used nationally-representative data to examine trends and racial/ethnic disparities in tap water consumption among US children and adults which included the pre- and post-Flint period as national awareness about water safety concerns increased. There was little change between 2011-14, but probability of not drinking tap water increased successively from 2013-14 to 2017–2018, with Hispanic, Black, and Asian individuals being more likely to not drink tap water than whites. Self-reported race/ethnicity continued to be the largest predictor of not drinking tap water of all covariates examined as the differential treatment of individuals in these categories increases exposure to environmental injustice and racism11.
While recent studies indicate that up to two million Americans lack basic water access1 - particularly in urban areas25 - our study indicates the broader problem is far more pervasive. In 2017–2018, ∼20% of US children/adolescents and adults did not drink tap water, which translates into 14.8 million children and 46.6 million adults using the NCHS Census population totals. Tap water consumption has health benefits through fluoride delivery that lowers risk of dental caries16. Moreover, when individuals do not drink water they consume double the calories from sugar-sweetened beverages13.
We found persistent racial/ethnic disparities, and that among Hispanic and Black households their probability of not drinking tap has increased recently. Prior research found that Black and Hispanic populations are less likely to drink tap water12,19 due to higher inequities in water access9 and distrust among these populations26. A recent paper examining trends in tap water intake using NHANES 2011-2016 data did not find significant changes in the volume of tap water consumed over time but did uncover increases in the volume of bottled water consumed27. While our primary variable was based on whether persons consumed their tap water rather than the average volume of water consumed, our results were robust when using a dichotomous variable of any tap water intake from the 24-hour dietary recall. It is critical to monitor trends in the lack of any tap water consumption beyond average mean intakes because this can provide a window into potential underlying water insecurity. Second, we also found that prevalence of any bottled water consumption on a given day was 25% higher in 2017-18 than 2013-14, supporting the recent trends of increasing bottled water intake in the US12,27.
Environmental injustice and racism contribute to these disparities9 as water quality violations28 and water shutoffs9 disproportionately affect these communities. Drinking water quality violations often occur at the intersection of race and class where low-income Black and Hispanic communities are at the greatest risk of marginalization29. Our results suggest little progress in addressing these inequities. Increased national awareness of water quality violations following the Flint Water Crisis, emerging local water contaminant exceedances in other cities like Newark, NJ, or other unknown factors may help explain our findings. In particular, increasing reports of lead violations in school drinking water, following increasing requirements to test at the tap, have likely heightened concerns regarding tap water safety3. Future studies should be conducted to confirm these hypotheses.
Study limitations include the inability to know why participants did not drink their tap water as follow-up questions were not asked. However, we used two measures of tap water consumption to provide additional internal validity of results and find that shifts to bottled water occurred. This study is limited by not having geographical data, but its goal was to examine recent national trends in tap water consumption rather than geographic differences. Recent work has demonstrated that structural issues like precarious housing within communities of color increases risk of incomplete plumbing25,30. Tap water filtration was discontinued following the 2009-2010 survey and thus was not controlled for. However, prior work has demonstrated that use of tap water filters do not have an overall effect on these national estimates of tap water consumption12. NCHS addressed the declining response rates through the sampling weights, which further took into account non-response and loss of screener to examination18.
Conclusion
Approximately 63% and 40% more Black and Hispanic children and adults did not drink their tap water in 2017–18 compared to 2013-14. That approximately 61.4 million Americans did not drink tap water represents a substantial opportunity to improve public health nutrition. Further, that bottled water consumption continues to increase while Black, Asian, and Hispanic households are more likely to rely on it levies additional socioeconomic strain. Policies that address the root environmental injustices that low-income and minority communities’ face in accessing safe tap water are necessary to halting the growing racial disparity gap observed in tap water consumption26. To design meaningful solutions more work with communities of color is needed to understand the various factors that contribute to eschewing tap water.
Data Availability
Data comes from publicly available NHANES and can be downloaded here: https://www.n.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/default.aspx?BeginYear=2017
Footnotes
Under consideration at Public Health Nutrition
The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.
Funding statement: This work was supported by the Ann Atherton Hertzler Early Career Professorship funds, and Penn State’s Population Research Institute (NICHD P2CHD041025). The funders had no role in the research or interpretation of results.