ABSTRACT
Objective To conduct a systematic review of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood biomarkers as diagnostic tests for sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD) in a specialised care setting and to compare diagnostic accuracies in a network meta-analysis (NMA).
Methods We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for diagnostic studies of sCJD biomarkers. Risk of bias was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool. We used a generalised bivariate model to conduct individual biomarker meta-analyses, and to estimate between-study variability. To investigate sources of heterogeneity, we performed subgroup analyses based on QUADAS-2 quality and clinical criteria. For the NMA, we applied a Bayesian beta-binomial ANOVA model. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42019118830).
Results Out of 2,976 publications screened, we included 16 studies, which investigated 14-3-3β Western blot (n=13), 14-3-3γ ELISA (n=3), NfL (n=1), NSE (n=1), p-tau181/t-tau ratio (n=2), RT-QuIC (n=6), S100B (n=3), t-tau (n=12), and t-tau/Aβ42 ratio (n=1) in CSF. No included study investigated blood biomarkers. Many diagnostic studies excluded had strong limitations in study design. In the NMA, RT-QuIC (0.93; 95% CI [0.87, 0.96]) and NfL (0.94 [0.81, 0.99]) were the most sensitive biomarkers. RT-QuIC was the most specific biomarker (0.96 [0.86, 0.99]), and had the highest balanced accuracy (0.94). Heterogeneity in accuracy estimates was high between studies, especially for specificity.
Conclusions Our NMA identified RT-QuIC as the overall most accurate biomarker, partially confirming current guidelines. The severe shortcomings identified in many diagnostic studies for sCJD biomarkers need to be addressed in future studies in the field.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
PROSPERO CRD42019118830
Clinical Protocols
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019118830
Funding Statement
This study was supported by intramural funds from the Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Germany.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
No approval by an IRB or regional review board was needed for this meta-analysis.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
