Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Quantifying the Benefits of Targeting for Pandemic Response

Sergio Camelo, View ORCID ProfileDragos F. Ciocan, View ORCID ProfileDan A. Iancu, View ORCID ProfileXavier S. Warnes, View ORCID ProfileSpyros I. Zoumpoulis
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.23.21254155
Sergio Camelo
aInstitute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dragos F. Ciocan
bTechnology and Operations Management, INSEAD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dragos F. Ciocan
Dan A. Iancu
bTechnology and Operations Management, INSEAD
cOperations, Information & Technology, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dan A. Iancu
  • For correspondence: daniancu{at}stanford.edu
Xavier S. Warnes
cOperations, Information & Technology, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Xavier S. Warnes
Spyros I. Zoumpoulis
dDecision Sciences, INSEAD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Spyros I. Zoumpoulis
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

To respond to pandemics such as COVID-19, policy makers have relied on interventions that target specific age groups or activities. Such targeting is potentially contentious, so rigorously quantifying its benefits and downsides is critical for designing effective and equitable pandemic control policies. We propose a flexible modeling framework and algorithms to compute optimally targeted interventions that coordinate across two dimensions of heterogeneity: age of different groups and the specific activities that individuals engage in during the course of a day. We showcase a complete implementation in a case study focused on the COVID-19 epidemic in the Île-de-France region of France, based on hospitalization, community mobility, social contacts and economic data. We find that optimized dual-targeted policies generate substantial complementarities that lead to Pareto improvements, reducing the number of deaths and the economic losses overall and reducing the time in confinement for each age group, compared to less targeted interventions. These policies have a simple and explainable structure. Since dual-targeted policies could lead to increased discrepancies in the confinements faced by distinct groups, we also quantify the impact of requirements that explicitly limit such disparities, and find that satisfactory trade-offs may be achievable through limited targeting.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No external funding was received.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed. No necessary IRB/ethics committee approvals, to the best of our knowledge.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data referred to in the manuscript are public and URL references to the datasets are included in the manuscript.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 18, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Quantifying the Benefits of Targeting for Pandemic Response
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Quantifying the Benefits of Targeting for Pandemic Response
Sergio Camelo, Dragos F. Ciocan, Dan A. Iancu, Xavier S. Warnes, Spyros I. Zoumpoulis
medRxiv 2021.03.23.21254155; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.23.21254155
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Quantifying the Benefits of Targeting for Pandemic Response
Sergio Camelo, Dragos F. Ciocan, Dan A. Iancu, Xavier S. Warnes, Spyros I. Zoumpoulis
medRxiv 2021.03.23.21254155; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.23.21254155

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (430)
  • Allergy and Immunology (754)
  • Anesthesia (221)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3287)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (363)
  • Dermatology (277)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1169)
  • Epidemiology (13354)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (898)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5144)
  • Geriatric Medicine (481)
  • Health Economics (782)
  • Health Informatics (3263)
  • Health Policy (1140)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1189)
  • Hematology (429)
  • HIV/AIDS (1017)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14619)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (912)
  • Medical Education (476)
  • Medical Ethics (126)
  • Nephrology (522)
  • Neurology (4916)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (725)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (882)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2518)
  • Ophthalmology (723)
  • Orthopedics (280)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (542)
  • Pediatrics (1299)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (549)
  • Primary Care Research (556)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4202)
  • Public and Global Health (7492)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1704)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1010)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (479)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (497)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (547)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (235)
  • Urology (205)