Abstract
Background Effective measurement of all health indicators and especially SRHR is difficult in humanitarian settings. Displacement and insecurity due to conflict, natural disasters, and epidemics place women and girls at higher risk of SRHR-related morbidity and mortality and reduce the coverage of essential SRHR services. This scoping review describes the measurement tools, methods, and indicators used to measure SRHR coverage and outcome indicators in humanitarian settings in the past 15 years and presents an accessible dashboard that can be used by governments, researchers and implementing organizations to identify available SRHR measurement tools.
Methods Scientific articles published between January 2004 and May 2019 were identified using Embase, Medline, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Scopus, PAIS index as well as relevant non-peer-reviewed literature available through websites of humanitarian organizations. Publications including data from low- or middle-income countries (LMICs), focused on women and/or girls living in areas impacted by a humanitarian crisis, where data was collected within five years of the crisis were included. Indicators extracted from these publications were categorized according to validated SRHR indicators recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). Measurement tools, sampling and data collection methods, gap areas (geographical, topical and contextual), and indicators were catalogued for easy access in an interactive Tableau dashboard.
Results Our search yielded 42,081 peer-reviewed publications and 2,569 non-peer-reviewed reports. After initial title and abstract screening, 385 publications met the inclusion criteria. SRHR indicators were categorized into nine domains: abortion, antenatal care, family planning, gender-based violence, HIV and sexually transmitted infections, maternal health, maternal mortality, menstrual and gynecological health, and obstetric care (delivery). A total of 65 tools and questionnaires measuring SRHR were identified, of which 25 were designed specifically for humanitarian settings.
Discussion Although SRHR was measured in humanitarian settings, several gaps in measurement were identified. Abortion and gynaecological health were not consistently measured across included studies or validated WHO indicators. Toolkits and indicators identified in this review may be used to inform future SRHR data collection in humanitarian settings. However, identifying and/or developing innovative data collection methodologies should be a research priority, especially in light of the recent COVID-19 pandemic.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Funded by Global Affairs Canada and the Canadian Partnership for Women and Childrens Health
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This is a scoping review, it is not a clinical trial, and did not need ethics approval. There was no primary data collection.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- ACASI
- audio computer-assisted self-interviews;
- ALNAP
- Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance;
- ANC
- Antenatal Care;
- CanWaCH
- Canadian Partnership for Women and Children’s Health;
- DHS
- Demographic and Health Survey;
- FGM/C
- Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting;
- FP
- Family Planning;
- GBV
- Gender-Based Violence;
- GEWE
- Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment;
- HIV
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus;
- IAFM
- Interagency Field Manual;
- IAWG
- Inter-Agency Working Group;
- ICRC
- International Committee of the Red Cross;
- IDP
- Internally Displaced Persons;
- IRC
- International Rescue Committee;
- LMICs
- Low- and Middle-Income Countries;
- MHM
- Menstrual Hygiene Management;
- MISP
- Minimum Initial Service Package;
- MMR
- Maternal Mortality Rate;
- MSF
- Médecins Sans Frontières;
- NGOs
- Non-Governmental Organizations;
- PNC
- Post-Natal Care;
- PRISMA
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews;
- SCI
- Save the Children International;
- SDGs
- Sustainable Development Goals;
- SRHR
- Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights;
- STIs
- Sexually Transmitted Infections;
- SVRI
- Sexual Violence Research Initiatives;
- UNFPA
- United Nations Population Fund;
- UNHCR
- United Nations High Commission for Refugees;
- WHO
- World Health Organization;
- WRA
- Women of Reproductive Age
