Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Limit of detection in different matrices of nineteen commercially available rapid antigen tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2

View ORCID ProfileAna I. Cubas-Atienzar, Konstantina Kontogianni, Thomas Edwards, Dominic Wooding, Kate Buist, Caitlin R. Thompson, Christopher T. Williams, Edward I Patterson, Grant Hughes, Lisa Baldwin, Camille Escadafal, Jilian A. Sacks, Emily R. Adams
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.19.21253950
Ana I. Cubas-Atienzar
1Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Centre for Drugs and Diagnostics, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ana I. Cubas-Atienzar
  • For correspondence: ana.cubasatienzar{at}lstmed.ac.uk
Konstantina Kontogianni
1Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Centre for Drugs and Diagnostics, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Edwards
1Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Centre for Drugs and Diagnostics, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dominic Wooding
1Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Centre for Drugs and Diagnostics, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kate Buist
1Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Centre for Drugs and Diagnostics, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caitlin R. Thompson
1Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Centre for Drugs and Diagnostics, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher T. Williams
1Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Centre for Drugs and Diagnostics, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward I Patterson
2Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Departments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Tropical Diseases, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
3Brock University, Department of Biological Sciences, St. Catharines, L2S 3A1, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Grant Hughes
2Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Departments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Tropical Diseases, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa Baldwin
1Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Centre for Drugs and Diagnostics, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Camille Escadafal
4FIND, Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jilian A. Sacks
4FIND, Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily R. Adams
1Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Centre for Drugs and Diagnostics, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

In the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic there has been an increase of the use of antigen-detection rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT). The performance of Ag-RDT vary greatly between manufacturers and evaluating their analytical limit of detection (LOD) has become high priority. Here we describe a manufacturer-independent evaluation of the LOD of 19 marketed Ag-RDT using live SARS-CoV-2 spiked in different matrices: direct culture supernatant, a dry swab, and a swab in Amies. Additionally, the LOD using dry swab was investigated after 7 days’ storage at −80°C of the SARS-CoV-2 serial dilutions. An LOD of ≈ 5.0 × 102 pfu/ml (1.0 × 106 genome copies/ml) in culture media is defined as acceptable by the World Health Organization. Fourteen of nineteen Ag-RDTs (ActiveXpress, Espline, Excalibur, Innova, Joysbio, Mologic, NowCheck, Orient, PanBio, RespiStrip, Roche, Standard-F, Standard-Q and Sure-Status) exceeded this performance criteria using direct culture supernatant applied to the Ag-RDT. Six Ag-RDT were not compatible with Amies media and a decreased sensitivity of 2 to 20-fold was observed for eleven tests on the stored dilutions at −80°C for 7 days. Here, we provide analytical sensitivity data to guide appropriate test and sample type selection for use and for future Ag-RDT evaluations.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The study was supported by Foundation of New Diagnostics (FIND).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

No applicable

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data generated during this study is presented in an analyzed format in this manuscript. Raw datasets are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 22, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Limit of detection in different matrices of nineteen commercially available rapid antigen tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Limit of detection in different matrices of nineteen commercially available rapid antigen tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2
Ana I. Cubas-Atienzar, Konstantina Kontogianni, Thomas Edwards, Dominic Wooding, Kate Buist, Caitlin R. Thompson, Christopher T. Williams, Edward I Patterson, Grant Hughes, Lisa Baldwin, Camille Escadafal, Jilian A. Sacks, Emily R. Adams
medRxiv 2021.03.19.21253950; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.19.21253950
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Limit of detection in different matrices of nineteen commercially available rapid antigen tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2
Ana I. Cubas-Atienzar, Konstantina Kontogianni, Thomas Edwards, Dominic Wooding, Kate Buist, Caitlin R. Thompson, Christopher T. Williams, Edward I Patterson, Grant Hughes, Lisa Baldwin, Camille Escadafal, Jilian A. Sacks, Emily R. Adams
medRxiv 2021.03.19.21253950; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.19.21253950

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (430)
  • Allergy and Immunology (756)
  • Anesthesia (221)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3296)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (364)
  • Dermatology (280)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1171)
  • Epidemiology (13381)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (899)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5155)
  • Geriatric Medicine (482)
  • Health Economics (783)
  • Health Informatics (3271)
  • Health Policy (1142)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1192)
  • Hematology (431)
  • HIV/AIDS (1018)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14632)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (913)
  • Medical Education (477)
  • Medical Ethics (127)
  • Nephrology (524)
  • Neurology (4928)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (730)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (883)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2524)
  • Ophthalmology (726)
  • Orthopedics (281)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (543)
  • Pediatrics (1302)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (551)
  • Primary Care Research (557)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4216)
  • Public and Global Health (7507)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1706)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1014)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (480)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (498)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (548)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (236)
  • Urology (205)