Abstract
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is the term used to identify those individuals with subjective and objective cognitive decline but with preserved activities of daily living and an absence of dementia. While MCI can impact functioning in different cognitive domains, most notably episodic memory, relatively little is known about the comprehension of language in MCI. In this study we used around-the-ear electrodes (cEEGrids) to identify impairments during language comprehension in MCI patients. In a group of 23 MCI patients and 23 age-matched controls, language comprehension was tested in a two-word phrase paradigm. We examined the oscillatory changes following word onset as a function of lexical retrieval (e.g. swrfeq versus swift) and semantic binding (e.g. horse preceded by swift versus preceded by swrfeq). Electrophysiological signatures (as measured by the cEEGrids) were significantly different between MCI patients and controls. In controls lexical retrieval was associated with a rebound in the alpha/beta range and semantic binding was associated with a post-word alpha/beta suppression. In contrast, both the lexical retrieval and semantic binding signatures were absent in the MCI group. The signatures observed using cEEGrids in controls were comparable to those signatures obtained with a full-cap EEG set-up. Importantly, our findings suggest that MCI patients have impaired electrophysiological signatures for comprehending single-words and multi-word phrases. Moreover, cEEGrids set-ups provide a non-invasive and sensitive clinical tool for detecting early impairments in language comprehension in MCI.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding supported this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics approval was obtained from the NHS Cambridge South Research Ethics Committee; the University of Cambridge Human Biology Research Ethics Committee and by the University of Birmingham Ethical Review (ERN 15-0866).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Anonymized data are available on request pending approval from ethics body.
