Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests in pre-/asymptomatic close contacts of individuals with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection

View ORCID ProfileE Schuit, IK Veldhuijzen, View ORCID ProfileRP Venekamp, W van den Bijllaardt, SD Pas, EB Lodder, R Molenkamp, CH GeurtsvanKessel, J. Velzing, RC Huisman, L Brouwer, T Boelsums, GJ Sips, KSM Benschop, L Hooft, JHHM van de Wijgert, S van den Hof, KGM Moons
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.18.21253874
E Schuit
1Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
2Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E Schuit
IK Veldhuijzen
3Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RP Venekamp
1Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for RP Venekamp
W van den Bijllaardt
4Microvida Laboratory for Medical Microbiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SD Pas
4Microvida Laboratory for Medical Microbiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
5Microvida Laboratory for Medical Microbiology. Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
EB Lodder
6Public Health Service West-Brabant, Breda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R Molenkamp
7Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CH GeurtsvanKessel
7Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Velzing
7Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RC Huisman
7Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L Brouwer
8Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T Boelsums
8Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GJ Sips
3Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
8Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KSM Benschop
3Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L Hooft
1Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
2Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JHHM van de Wijgert
1Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
9Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S van den Hof
3Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KGM Moons
1Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
2Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: k.g.m.moons@umcutrecht.nl
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Pre-/asymptomatic close contacts of SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals were tested at day 5 after contact by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Diagnostic accuracy of antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT) in pre-/asymptomatic close contacts was up till now unknown.

Methods We performed a prospective cross-sectional diagnostic test accuracy study. Close contacts (e.g. selected via the test-and-trace program or contact tracing app) aged ≥16 years and asymptomatic when requesting a test, were included consecutively and tested at day 5 at four Dutch public health service test sites. We evaluated two Ag-RDTs (BD Veritor™ System Ag-RDT (BD), and Roche/SD Biosensor Ag-RDT (SD-B)) with RT-PCR as the reference standard. Virus culture was performed in RT-PCR positive individuals to determine the viral load cut-off above which 95% was culture positive, as a proxy of infectiousness.

Results Of 2,678 BD-tested individuals, 233 (8.7%) were RT-PCR positive and BD detected 149 (sensitivity 63.9%; 95% confidence interval 57.4%-70.1%). Out of 1,596 SD-B-tested individuals, 132 (8.3%) were RT-PCR positive and SD-B detected 83 (sensitivity 62.9%; 54.0%-71.1%). When applying an infectiousness viral load cut-off ≥ 5.2 log10 gene copies/mL, the sensitivity was 90.1% (84.2%-94.4%) for BD, 86.8% (78.1% to 93.0%) for SD-B overall, and 88.1% (80.5%-93.5%) for BD, 85.1% (74.3%-92.6%) for SD-B for those still asymptomatic at the actual time of sampling. Specificity was >99% for both Ag-RDTs in all analyses.

Conclusions The sensitivity for detecting SARS-CoV-2 of both Ag-RDTs in pre-/asymptomatic close contacts is over 60%, increasing to over 85% after applying an infectiousness viral load cut-off.

Trial registration number Not applicable. A study protocol is available upon request.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The study was funded by the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport. The funder had no role in the design, conduct, data-analysis or report of the study.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Medical Ethics Review Committee (METC) Utrecht concluded that ethics approval was not required because the study is outside the scope of the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (protocol number: 20/750). All participants signed an informed consent form prior to any study procedure.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • ↵* Dual first authorship

  • ↵# Dual senior authorship

  • The supplement contained errors in the numbering of tables and the figure. These have been corrected to make sure all cross-references to tables and the figure in the supplementary material are correct again. In addition, the caption of Table S4 has been adjusted, and a STARD reporting checklist was added as a supplement. No changes were made to the main text, analysis, or results.

Data Availability

Data will not available for sharing.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 23, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests in pre-/asymptomatic close contacts of individuals with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests in pre-/asymptomatic close contacts of individuals with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection
E Schuit, IK Veldhuijzen, RP Venekamp, W van den Bijllaardt, SD Pas, EB Lodder, R Molenkamp, CH GeurtsvanKessel, J. Velzing, RC Huisman, L Brouwer, T Boelsums, GJ Sips, KSM Benschop, L Hooft, JHHM van de Wijgert, S van den Hof, KGM Moons
medRxiv 2021.03.18.21253874; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.18.21253874
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests in pre-/asymptomatic close contacts of individuals with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection
E Schuit, IK Veldhuijzen, RP Venekamp, W van den Bijllaardt, SD Pas, EB Lodder, R Molenkamp, CH GeurtsvanKessel, J. Velzing, RC Huisman, L Brouwer, T Boelsums, GJ Sips, KSM Benschop, L Hooft, JHHM van de Wijgert, S van den Hof, KGM Moons
medRxiv 2021.03.18.21253874; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.18.21253874

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (175)
  • Allergy and Immunology (421)
  • Anesthesia (97)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (901)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (171)
  • Dermatology (102)
  • Emergency Medicine (257)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (407)
  • Epidemiology (8794)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (405)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1864)
  • Geriatric Medicine (179)
  • Health Economics (388)
  • Health Informatics (1292)
  • Health Policy (644)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (493)
  • Hematology (207)
  • HIV/AIDS (396)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10575)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (564)
  • Medical Education (193)
  • Medical Ethics (52)
  • Nephrology (218)
  • Neurology (1762)
  • Nursing (104)
  • Nutrition (267)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (343)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (461)
  • Oncology (966)
  • Ophthalmology (283)
  • Orthopedics (107)
  • Otolaryngology (177)
  • Pain Medicine (118)
  • Palliative Medicine (43)
  • Pathology (265)
  • Pediatrics (557)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (266)
  • Primary Care Research (221)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1846)
  • Public and Global Health (3992)
  • Radiology and Imaging (655)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (344)
  • Respiratory Medicine (536)
  • Rheumatology (216)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (178)
  • Sports Medicine (166)
  • Surgery (197)
  • Toxicology (37)
  • Transplantation (107)
  • Urology (80)