ABSTRACT
Objective To report our recommended methodology for extracting and confirming published research uncertainties during a broad scope Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) with the James Lind Alliance.
Setting This process was completed in the UK as part of the PSP for “Common Conditions Affecting the Hand and Wrist”, comprising of health professionals, patients and carers.
Design and Data Extraction We applied best practice in systematic review methodology and reporting, including independent screening and data extraction by multiple researchers and use of a PRISMA flowchart, alongside steering group consensus processes.
Data Sources Cochrane Systematic Reviews and Protocols, NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) Guidelines, and SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network) Guidelines.
Selection Criteria Selection of research uncertainties was guided by the scope of the Common Conditions Affecting the Hand and Wrist PSP which focused on “common hand conditions routinely treated by hand specialists, including hand surgeons and hand therapists limited to identifying questions concerning the results of intervention, and not the basic science or epidemiology behind disease.
Results Of 2358 records identified after duplicate extraction which entered the screening process, 186 records were presented to the PSP steering group for eligibility assessment; 79 were deemed within scope and included for the purpose of research uncertainty extraction (45 full Cochrane Reviews, 18 Cochrane Review protocols, 16 Guidelines). These yielded 89 research uncertainties, which were compared to the stakeholder survey, and added to the longlist where necessary; before derived uncertainties were checked against non-Cochrane published systematic reviews.
Conclusions In carrying out this work, beyond reporting on output of the Common Conditions Affecting the Hand and Wrist PSP, we detail the methodology and processes we hope can inform and facilitate the work of future PSPs and other evidence reviews, especially those with a broader scope beyond a single disease or condition.
Strengths and Limitations
– This is a novel and rigorous approach to uncertainty extraction and verification in the setting of a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.
– The detailed methodology provides transparency regarding the extraction and verification of uncertainties.
– The uncertainty extraction and verification relied upon the HandSRev database – similar resources may not be available for other Priority Setting Partnerships.
Competing Interest Statement
This work was funded by the British Society for Surgery of the Hand. AK, AJ, GG, DF, TRCD, and RWT are consultant hand surgeons and members of the British Society for Surgery of the Hand. All are active in clinical and non-clinical research. No authors received compensation or renumeration in anyway for the work completed. KC is a senior adviser to the James Lind Alliance and co-author and editor of the JLA Guidebook. She supports the JLA Secretariat including in recruiting and training the team of JLA advisers. She was an independently contracted adviser for this work. None of the authors declare any other competing interests.
Funding Statement
This Priority Setting Partnership was funded in full by the British Society for Surgery of the Hand (BSSH).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
no relevant ethical guidelines to follow, this was a JLA PSP
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
changed corresponding author email address to institutional email rather than personal
Data Availability
Raw data available at http://www.jla.nihr.ac.uk/priority-setting-partnerships/common-conditons-affecting-the-hand-and-wrist/
