Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Details of COVID-19 Disease Mitigation Strategies in 17 K-12 Schools in Wood County, Wisconsin

Amy Falk, Alison Benda, Peter Falk, Sarah Steffen, Mikaela DeCoster, View ORCID ProfileMonica Gandhi, View ORCID ProfileTracy Beth Høeg
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.16.21253761
Amy Falk
1Department of Pediatrics, Aspirus Doctors Clinic, 2031 Peach St. Wisconsin Rapids, WI
2Medical College of Wisconsin - Central Wisconsin, Wausau, WI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: amy.falk22@gmail.com
Alison Benda
2Medical College of Wisconsin - Central Wisconsin, Wausau, WI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Falk
3ReVision Eye Care, Wisconsin Rapids WI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Steffen
2Medical College of Wisconsin - Central Wisconsin, Wausau, WI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mikaela DeCoster
2Medical College of Wisconsin - Central Wisconsin, Wausau, WI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Monica Gandhi
4Center for AIDS Research, Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases, and Global Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Monica Gandhi
Tracy Beth Høeg
5Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of California - Davis
6Northern California Orthopaedic Associates, Grass Valley, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tracy Beth Høeg
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Importance With the current COVID-19 return-to-school guidelines, over half of America’s K-12 students are being denied access to full time in-person education, leading to harmful academic, emotional and health consequences.

Objective To describe the specific details of mitigation strategies employed at 17 K-12 schools in Wisconsin during a time of exceptionally high COVID-19 community disease prevalence where in-school transmission was minimal. The aim of this report is to assist school districts and governing bodies in developing full-time return to school plans.

Design Retrospective cohort

Setting Wood County, Wisconsin, August 31–November 29, 2020

Participants 5,530 students and staff from 17 schools in 4 school districts

Main outcomes and measures

  1. Distancing between primary and secondary students in school

  2. School ventilation details

  3. Masking among teachers

  4. Lunch, recess and bussing practices

Results 89.3% of elementary students included in our study did not maintain 6 feet of physical distancing in the classroom and 94.8% were within 6 feet in lunchrooms. The majority of secondary students (86.2%) were able to maintain 6 feet of distancing in the classroom but no students were greater than 6 feet in the hallways. 58.8% of schools did not install new ventilation systems prior to the school year. Students ate lunch indoors. Bussing of students continued and all elementary children were allowed to go without masks at recess.

Conclusion and relevance In the setting of high community COVID-19 disease transmission, 6 feet of distance between elementary students and major ventilation system renovations in primary or secondary schools do not appear to be necessary to minimize disease spread. Requiring masks at recess and prohibiting bussing also appears unnecessary. These findings may inform guidance on the safe reopening of schools and allow for more children to return to in-person schooling.

Introduction

Since March of 2020, approximately 1/3 of children in our country’s schools have had no in-person learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic (1) and over a half continue to not be in school full time (2). An estimated 3 million K-12 students haven’t engaged in any form of on-line learning and are considered lost to the educational system since the start of the pandemic (3). There are growing concerns about the harms of prolonged school closures. On January 26th, 2021, our group’s study (4) “COVID-19 Cases and Transmission in 17 K–12 Schools — Wood County, Wisconsin, August 31–November 29, 2020” published in the CDC’s journal, MMWR, reported low in-school disease transmission rates in a community with a test positivity rate of up to 41.6% and up to 1,189/100,000 weekly cases. Of the 191 cases identified in schools during the 13 week study period, 7 cases (5 elementary, 2 secondary students) were determined to be contracted in school. Zero cases were contracted by staff in school. These findings have been cited (5) as evidence that K-12 schools can safely reopen despite high community disease spread. On February 26th, 2021, the CDC released Operational Guidelines (6) advising against full-time in-person learning for elementary students or any in-person learning for secondary students when community transmission is above 10% test positivity or 100 cases/100,000 per week. For reference, our study had community disease rates up to 12 times higher than this threshold and our school openings were successful.

Furthermore, the new guidelines recommend students maintain at least 6 feet of distance with community transmission 24 times lower than in our study (50/100,000 weekly cases). The space required to achieve this amount of distancing is resulting in many schools remaining closed or in hybrid mode. Recent data on student and staff rates of COVID-19 among classes with students seated 3 or 6 feet apart found no significant differences in overall disease incidence. (7). The purpose of this report is to provide further detail on distancing among students in class and at lunch in a setting of high community disease spread and minimal in-school transmission. We also report on school ventilation changes, recess policies, bussing practices and masking among teachers. Further information is also provided on the circumstances of in-school transmission of cases.

Methods

From August 31, 2020 to November 29, 2020, COVID-19 transmission data and masking compliance rates were collected from 8 elementary and 9 secondary schools with a total population of 5,530 students and teachers. In February 2021, a follow-up Google Forms survey was distributed to administration at each of the 17 participating schools. The questionnaire gathered information about distancing between students, teacher masking compliance, recess practices, and ventilation. The protocol was reviewed by the Aspirus Wausau Hospital Institutional Review Board and determined to be exempt from human subjects review as it met the requirements under 45 CFR 46. 104 (d) (2) and underwent a limited review as required under 46.111(a)(7).

Elementary Schools

This cohort included 1,529 elementary students and 275 staff. In classrooms, 90.7% of students were seated less than 6 feet from each other and 9.3% distancing 6 feet or more (Figure 1; Table 1). During lunch, only 5.2% of students were spaced 6 feet or more with the remaining 94.8% sitting less than 6 feet apart. In hallways 85.2% of students were 3-6 feet apart and the remaining were less than 3 feet. At recess 85.6% of children did not wear masks. All elementary students were allowed to utilize outdoor playground equipment and other recess toys.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Distance between students in primary classrooms.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Mitigation Strategies Among Students and in Schools

Secondary Schools

This cohort included 3,347 secondary students and 379 staff. In classrooms, 86.2% of secondary students maintained at least 6 feet of distance, 7.0% maintained between 3 and 6 feet and 6.8% less than 3 feet (Figure 2; Table 1). At lunch, 68.1% of students were seated greater than 6 feet apart and the remaining 31.9% were less than 6 feet apart. In the hallways, 56.8% of students were frequently between 0-3 feet, while the remainder were typically between 3-6 feet.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2.

Distance between students in secondary classrooms.

Teachers

Masking compliance among teachers while indoors was 90% or greater at all elementary and 7/9 secondary schools. 2/9 secondary schools, which had 6.9% of the secondary student population, reported teachers were masked 75-90% of the time.

Ventilation and bussing

41.2% of schools installed new air filtration systems that affected the entire school before the Fall 2020 school year; the remaining 58.8% did not (Figure 3, Table1). Regular opening of windows occurred in 11.8% of schools (Figure 4, Table 1).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 3.

School ventilation systems.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 4.

Classroom window opening practices.

All schools offered bussing for students. Masking was required of students and drivers. Physical distancing was attempted on busses, but seating children together was reported. Schools reported 25-50% of students utilized bussing services.

In-school disease spread and distancing of students

There were 7 total COVID-19 cases in children (none in staff) attributed to in-school spread: five elementary students and two secondary students. Three elementary cases occurred in one school which maintained 3-6 feet of distance in the classroom and greater than 6 feet at lunchtime. The remaining elementary cases occurred at separate schools; one school maintaining greater than 6 feet between students in the classroom and the other maintaining 0-3 feet. Both schools utilized greater than 6 feet distance at lunch. The two cases of COVID-19 among secondary students occurred at separate schools. One school described 3-6 feet between students; the other had greater than 6 feet in the classroom. At lunch, both schools maintained greater than 6 feet distancing. Due to the minimal amount of in-school spread in our study, it is not possible to rule out a correlation between distancing and disease spread.

Discussion

COVID-19 disease mitigation strategies in this K-12 population across 17 schools in Wisconsin varied greatly. Minimal in-school disease transmission was reported despite a community test positivity rate between 7 and 41.6% in the 13-week study period. During this time, the vast majority of elementary schools did not maintain 6 feet between students in classroom cohorts, while the majority, but not all, of secondary schools did. These results suggest that maintaining 6 feet distance between students, particularly not at the elementary level, is not required to effectively mitigate in-school SARS-CoV-2 spread.

At recess, most students did not mask or distance and were allowed to play with playground equipment within their cohorts. This has important implications for the well-being of children. Recess can provide necessary physical activity as well as a break from masking, which may make it easier for children to resume required indoor mitigation strategies.

Opening windows to increase airflow was not commonly done. Approximately half the schools changed air filtration systems without any obvious detriment to those that didn’t. This might reassure school districts where these mitigation measures are not structurally or financially possible.

Within the range of mitigation strategies outlined above, including nearly-universal indoor masking, cohorting and distancing as much as possible, there was minimal transmission among students and none to staff. Despite high community disease prevalence at the time of our study, stricter measures than those outlined in this report do not appear necessary for schools to safely reopen.

Data Availability

All data reported in this publication are available upon request through the corresponding author.

Acknowledgements

The school districts of south Wood County, Craig Broeren, Sue Kunferman, Dr. Lisa Olson. The authors report no relevant conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Burbio School and Community Events Data Platform. https://info.burbio.com/school-tracker-update-feb-15/. accessed February 20, 2021.
  2. 2.↵
    Burbio’s K-12 School Opening Tracker. Updated March, 15th, 2021. https://cai.burbio.com/school-opening-tracker/
  3. 3.↵
    As Many As 3 Million Children Have Gone Without Education Since March: Estimate. U.S. News & World Report. https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2020-10-21/as-many-as-3-million-children-have-gone-without-education-since-march-estimate. accessed February 20, 2021.
  4. 4.↵
    Falk A, Benda A, Falk P, Steffen S, Wallace Z, Høeg TB. COVID-19 Cases and Transmission in 17 K–12 Schools — Wood County, Wisconsin, August 31–November 29, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021;70:136–140. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7004e3
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    Mandavilli A, Taylor K, Goldstein D. C.D.C. Draws Up a Blueprint for Reopening Schools. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/12/health/school-reopenings-cdc.html. Published February 12, 2021. Accessed February 20, 2021.
  6. 6.↵
    “Operational Strategy for K-12 Schools through Phased Mitigation”, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/schools-childcare/operation-strategy.html#ftn16
  7. 7.↵
    Polly van den Berg, MD., Elissa M Schechter-Perkins, Md, MPH, Rebecca S Jack, MPP., Isabella Epshtein, MPP., Richard Nelson, PhD., Emily Oster, PhD., Westyn Branch-Elliman, Md, MMSc, Effectiveness of three versus six feet of physical distancing for controlling spread of COVID-19 among primary and secondary students and staff: A retrospective, state-wide cohort study, Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2021;, ciab230, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab230
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 20, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Details of COVID-19 Disease Mitigation Strategies in 17 K-12 Schools in Wood County, Wisconsin
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Details of COVID-19 Disease Mitigation Strategies in 17 K-12 Schools in Wood County, Wisconsin
Amy Falk, Alison Benda, Peter Falk, Sarah Steffen, Mikaela DeCoster, Monica Gandhi, Tracy Beth Høeg
medRxiv 2021.03.16.21253761; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.16.21253761
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Details of COVID-19 Disease Mitigation Strategies in 17 K-12 Schools in Wood County, Wisconsin
Amy Falk, Alison Benda, Peter Falk, Sarah Steffen, Mikaela DeCoster, Monica Gandhi, Tracy Beth Høeg
medRxiv 2021.03.16.21253761; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.16.21253761

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (238)
  • Allergy and Immunology (520)
  • Anesthesia (124)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1417)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (217)
  • Dermatology (158)
  • Emergency Medicine (291)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (582)
  • Epidemiology (10279)
  • Forensic Medicine (6)
  • Gastroenterology (527)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2621)
  • Geriatric Medicine (254)
  • Health Economics (496)
  • Health Informatics (1728)
  • Health Policy (788)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (671)
  • Hematology (266)
  • HIV/AIDS (564)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12078)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (647)
  • Medical Education (273)
  • Medical Ethics (83)
  • Nephrology (288)
  • Neurology (2451)
  • Nursing (144)
  • Nutrition (377)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (489)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (566)
  • Oncology (1318)
  • Ophthalmology (400)
  • Orthopedics (145)
  • Otolaryngology (235)
  • Pain Medicine (168)
  • Palliative Medicine (51)
  • Pathology (342)
  • Pediatrics (776)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (329)
  • Primary Care Research (296)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2393)
  • Public and Global Health (4995)
  • Radiology and Imaging (892)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (523)
  • Respiratory Medicine (681)
  • Rheumatology (309)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (254)
  • Sports Medicine (244)
  • Surgery (297)
  • Toxicology (45)
  • Transplantation (140)
  • Urology (108)