Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

The indirect health impacts of COVID19 restrictions: a strong debate informed by weak evidence

View ORCID ProfileDriss Ait Ouakrim, View ORCID ProfileAmeera Katar, View ORCID ProfilePatrick Abraham, View ORCID ProfileNathan Grills, View ORCID ProfileTony Blakely
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.16.21253759
Driss Ait Ouakrim
1Population Interventions Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Driss Ait Ouakrim
  • For correspondence: driss.aitouakrim@unimelb.edu.au
Ameera Katar
1Population Interventions Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ameera Katar
Patrick Abraham
2Health Economics Unit, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Patrick Abraham
Nathan Grills
3Nossal Institute, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nathan Grills
Tony Blakely
1Population Interventions Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tony Blakely
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

KEY MESSAGES

  • There has been concern, and much heated debate, on the possible negative effects of restrictions, stay-at-home orders and lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic.

  • Most published studies on health impacts of restrictions and lockdowns are low quality and often severely biased.

  • Focusing on the few studies that approximate a change in restrictions alone (i.e. not the impact of the pandemic per se), we see clear adverse impacts of lockdowns on intimate partner violence and physical activity. Regarding diseases, road traffic crashes decrease, and anxiety increases.

  • A discussion driven by science (not politics) is urgently needed on what lockdowns can deliver, their limitations and how to optimally deploy them – along other public health strategies – in the fight against COVID-19.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Anonymous philanthropic donation to the University of Melbourne.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

N/A

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

N/A

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 20, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The indirect health impacts of COVID19 restrictions: a strong debate informed by weak evidence
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The indirect health impacts of COVID19 restrictions: a strong debate informed by weak evidence
Driss Ait Ouakrim, Ameera Katar, Patrick Abraham, Nathan Grills, Tony Blakely
medRxiv 2021.03.16.21253759; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.16.21253759
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The indirect health impacts of COVID19 restrictions: a strong debate informed by weak evidence
Driss Ait Ouakrim, Ameera Katar, Patrick Abraham, Nathan Grills, Tony Blakely
medRxiv 2021.03.16.21253759; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.16.21253759

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (238)
  • Allergy and Immunology (521)
  • Anesthesia (124)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1417)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (217)
  • Dermatology (158)
  • Emergency Medicine (291)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (582)
  • Epidemiology (10284)
  • Forensic Medicine (6)
  • Gastroenterology (527)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2624)
  • Geriatric Medicine (254)
  • Health Economics (496)
  • Health Informatics (1729)
  • Health Policy (788)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (671)
  • Hematology (266)
  • HIV/AIDS (564)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12081)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (648)
  • Medical Education (273)
  • Medical Ethics (83)
  • Nephrology (288)
  • Neurology (2455)
  • Nursing (144)
  • Nutrition (377)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (489)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (566)
  • Oncology (1318)
  • Ophthalmology (400)
  • Orthopedics (146)
  • Otolaryngology (235)
  • Pain Medicine (168)
  • Palliative Medicine (51)
  • Pathology (342)
  • Pediatrics (778)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (329)
  • Primary Care Research (296)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2394)
  • Public and Global Health (4997)
  • Radiology and Imaging (892)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (524)
  • Respiratory Medicine (681)
  • Rheumatology (309)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (255)
  • Sports Medicine (244)
  • Surgery (297)
  • Toxicology (45)
  • Transplantation (140)
  • Urology (108)