COVID-19 collateral damage: psychological distress and behavioral changes among older adults during the first outbreak in Stockholm, Sweden

Study population

Study population consisted of 1231 older adults aged between 68 and 103, participating in the Swedish National study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen (SNAC-K). SNAC-K is a longitudinal study including a random sample of older adults aged 60 years and above living in the Kungsholmen area of Stockholm, Sweden. All SNAC-K participants who had participated in the regular follow-up assessment during 2016-2019 were invited to participate in a telephone interview aimed at monitoring preventive behaviors and the direct and indirect health consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. Telephone interviews were conducted between May and June (95%) by trained SNAC-K staff, following a multi-choice questionnaire that was ad hoc developed by SNAC-K researchers. Exclusion criteria included living in care and nursing homes, known diagnosis of dementia and very impaired hearing. The response rate was 91.9%. Subjects who refused to participate or could not be contacted had similar age and educational attainment to those who participated, but were more likely to be male (45.4% vs 35.7%, p=0.044).

Collateral damage

In this study we examined three dimensions of collateral damage: psychological distress and two aspects related to behavioral changes, i.e. reductions in social and physical activities, and in medical and social care use. Psychological distress was assessed with variables related to worrying about being affected by COVID-19 (very/extremely vs. not at all/somewhat/moderately), worrying about loved ones being affected by COVID-19 (very/extremely vs. not at all/somewhat/moderately), feeling nervous and/or stressed (often/very often vs. never/sometimes), and loneliness (≥5 vs. <5 on the Three-Item Loneliness Scale [15]). Changes in social and physical activities were measured by asking participants about reductions in social interactions, reductions in light physical activity (yes/no) and reductions in vigorous physical activity (yes/no). A reduction in social interactions, hereon referred to as social isolation, was defined as a reduction in physical communication with family and friends without an increase in phone and/or video communication. Care-related items included refraining from seeking medical care (yes/no) and receiving reduced care at home. Reduced care at home was defined as a decrease in the use of formal home-care services without an increase in received informal care.

Preventive measures and sources of information

Participants were asked about their adherence to a list of 9 recommendations −both general and those specific to elderly−, and the most common sources of information regarding the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sociodemographics

Sociodemographic variables in the present study included age, sex, education and living arrangement. Age was dichotomized as youngest old (≤80 years old) and oldest old (>80 years old). Highest obtained education was dichotomized as low (elementary) and high (high school, university, or above). Living arrangement was dichotomized into those who lived alone and those who did not.

Statistical analysis

Characteristics of the study sample were reported as overall, as well as stratified by the four sociodemographic variables. Between-group differences were assessed via two-tailed t-tests and chi-square tests as appropriate. Binary logistic regression models were used to assess the associations between sociodemographic variables and the different collateral damage dimensions, as well as each item within these dimensions. All models were mutually adjusted for all sociodemographic variables. All statistical tests were performed in StataSE 15 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA). Significance level (alpha) was set at 0.05 for all analyses.

Ethical considerations

Informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Review Board in Stockholm (dnr: 2020-02497).

Patient and public involvement

There was no direct public involvement either in the setting of the research questions or developing the study design.

Interpretation of results

Adherence to national recommendations is an important factor in mitigating the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. We found that participants in our study were well-informed about the pandemic and adopted low-risk behaviors during the first wave of COVID-19 outbreak. The majority of participants followed the Public Health Agency press-conferences, likely reflecting the high social and institutional trust in Sweden [14], and adhered to the Agency’s strongly recommended preventive measures.

We observe a substantial impact of the pandemic on the mental health of the elderly, with half of the sample reporting psychological distress. A fair share of the sample reported worrying about themselves and their loved ones being affected by COVID-19. Interestingly, the latter seems to be of more concern, a finding that has been replicated in another Swedish survey [14]. Loneliness and feelings of stress were also prevalent in our sample. This is in line with a large body of research showing considerable effects of the pandemic on mental health outcomes [16,17]. The burden seems to be unevenly borne by women and, to a lesser extent, by those living alone. Indeed, previous research has shown that women are at a higher risk of poor mental health [17] and worrying about family [18] during the pandemic.

High adherence to self-isolation recommendations, combined with a decrease in physical contact with loved ones, puts older adults at risk of social isolation. Social isolation presents a major modern-day challenge and has been associated with several negative health outcomes, such as depression [19], frailty [20], cognitive decline [21] and low quality of life [22,23]. While we did observe a reduction in frequency of physical meetings with family, friends and neighbors, this was largely met with an increase in phone and video communication with them. This is very important in the context of preventing the negative effects of loneliness and social isolation, as alternate forms of communication may buffer such effects [24,25].

Concern has been raised about reduction in physical activity as a major collateral consequence of the pandemic restrictions, as low physical activity is linked to negative cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes [9], poor mental health [10], frailty [26], and insomnia [27], among others. In spite of the Public Health Agency’s recommendations for the elderly to remain physically active and spend time outdoors in a safe manner, we still found that up to a third of the sample had decreased their frequency of both light and vigorous physical activity. Furthermore, it is important to highlight that the reduction in light physical activity was more prominent among the oldest old, who, in all likelihood, were also doing less incidental physical activity, such as climbing the stairs or visiting the supermarket, due to self-isolation. They might encounter difficulties in returning to their former activity levels should the pandemic persist for a long time, which requires close monitoring from medical and social services.

We found that subjects in our sample limited their contact with the healthcare system during the first wave of the pandemic, but when seeking for help, received it in a timely and satisfactory way. This is an important finding in a context where hospital overcrowding has emerged as an important challenge in many countries. Around 10% of our sample refrained from seeking medical care altogether, which may explain, among others, the reduction in cancer diagnosis by Swedish healthcare services compared to previous years [28]. Still, the proportion of those refraining is significantly lower than in the US, where a third of the population aged 65+ reported delaying or avoiding medical care during the first wave of the pandemic [29]. Subjects also decreased their use of formal care but seem to have compensated for it by an increase in received informal care. This could become a concern should the pandemic persist, since it is widely acknowledged that informal caregiving places significant economic, physical and mental burden on caregivers, who are often themselves older adults with health needs [30].

Strengths and limitations

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to examine the consequences of the Swedish COVID-19 strategy in a random sample of urban older adults. Further strengths include the use of an ad hoc questionnaire developed by a multidisciplinary team of experts, and the study sample coming from a well-characterized population-based study. Being based on data from Sweden, the study also provides a unique opportunity for comparison with other settings, as the Swedish strategy against COVID-19 differed from most countries. Certain limitations also need to be highlighted. We did not have recent pre-pandemic measures of physical and mental health. Thus, despite participants being asked to answer the questions for the period since March, the cross-sectional design does not allow us to assess temporal relationship between the onset of the pandemic and the studied outcomes. The findings from this cohort of older adults living in an affluent neighborhood of Stockholm may not be generalizable to the entire Swedish population. However, these findings could be viewed as a best-case scenario, and the identified collateral damage would be expected to be of higher magnitude in less urban and affluent parts of the country.