Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Limits of lockdown: characterising essential contacts during strict physical distancing

View ORCID ProfileAmy Thomas, Leon Danon, Hannah Christensen, Kate Northstone, Daniel Smith, Emily Nixon, View ORCID ProfileAdam Trickey, View ORCID ProfileGibran Hemani, Sarah Sauchelli, Adam Finn, Nicholas Timpson, Ellen Brooks-Pollock
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.12.21253484
Amy Thomas
1Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford Campus, BS40
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Amy Thomas
  • For correspondence: ellen.brooks-pollock@bristol.ac.uk
Leon Danon
2Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
3Alan Turing Institute, British Library, NW1 2DB, London UK
4Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, BS8 2BN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hannah Christensen
4Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, BS8 2BN
5National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at the University of Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kate Northstone
6ALSPAC, Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Smith
6ALSPAC, Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN
7MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily Nixon
1Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford Campus, BS40
8School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adam Trickey
4Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, BS8 2BN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Adam Trickey
Gibran Hemani
4Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, BS8 2BN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gibran Hemani
Sarah Sauchelli
9National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals of Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adam Finn
4Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, BS8 2BN
10Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas Timpson
6ALSPAC, Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN
7MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ellen Brooks-Pollock
1Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford Campus, BS40
5National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at the University of Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ellen.brooks-pollock@bristol.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 has exposed health inequalities within countries and globally. The fundamental determining factor behind an individual’s risk of infection is the number of social contacts they make. In many countries, physical distancing measures have been implemented to control transmission of SARS-CoV-2, reducing social contacts to a minimum. Characterising unavoidable social contacts is key for understanding the inequalities behind differential risks and planning vaccination programmes. We utilised an existing English longitudinal birth cohort, which is broadly representative of the wider population (n=6807), to explore social contact patterns and behaviours when strict physical distancing measures were in place during the UK’s first lockdown in March-May 2020. Essential workers, specifically those in healthcare, had 4.5 times as many contacts as non-essential workers [incident rate ratio = 4.42 (CI95%: 3.88–5.04)], whilst essential workers in other sectors, mainly teaching and the police force had three times as many contacts [IRR = 2.84 (2.58–3.13)]. The number of individuals in a household, which is conflated by number of children, increases essential social contacts by 40%. Self-isolation effectively reduces numbers of contacts outside of the home, but not entirely. Together, these findings will aid the interpretation of epidemiological data and impact the design of effective SARS-CoV-2 control strategies, such as vaccination, testing and contact tracing.

Competing Interest Statement

EBP and LD contribute to the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling (SPIM). AF contributes to the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI).

Funding Statement

The UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome (Grant ref: 217065/Z/19/Z) and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. This publication is the work of the authors and ACT, LD, HC, KN, DS, EN, AT, GH, SST, AF, NT, EBP will serve as guarantors for the contents of this paper. A comprehensive list of grants funding is available on the ALSPAC website (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/external/documents/grant-acknowledgements.pdf); This research was specifically funded by the Wellcome Trust, Medical Research Council and University of Bristol Elizabeth Blackwell Institute for Research (102215/2/13/2). ACT and GH are funded by the Wellcome Trust (217509/Z/19/Z and 208806/Z/17/Z). HC and EBP would like to acknowledge support from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at the University of Bristol. HC is additionally funded through an NIHR Career Development Fellowship [CDF-2018-11-ST2-015]. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. EN, LD and EBP are supported by the MRC (MR/V038613/1). LD and EBP are also supported by the MRC (MC/PC/19067) and LD is further supported by EPSRC (EP/V051555/1) and The Alan Turing Institute under the EPSRC grant EP/N510129/1. NJT is a Wellcome Trust Investigator (202802/Z/16/Z), is the PI of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (MRC & WT 217065/Z/19/Z), is supported by the University of Bristol NIHR Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-2001), the MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (MC_UU_00011) and works within the CRUK Integrative Cancer Epidemiology Programme (C18281/A19169).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee and the Local Research Ethics Committees. Informed consent for the use of data collected via questionnaires and clinics was obtained from participants following the recommendations of the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee at the time. Participation was voluntary and analyses were performed on anonymised data.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Full details of the cohort and study design have been described previously and are available at http://www.alspac.bris.ac.uk.

Please note that the study website contains details of all the data that is available through a fully searchable data dictionary and variable search tool (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/our-data/).

ALSPAC data access is managed through a system of open access. The steps below highlight how to apply for access to the data included in this project (accessed under the project number B3514) and all other ALSPAC data:

  1. Please read the ALSPAC access policy, which describes the process of accessing the data and samples in detail, and outlines the costs associated with doing so.

  2. You may also find it useful to browse our fully searchable research proposals database, which lists all research projects that have been approved since April 2011.

  3. Please submit your research proposal for consideration by the ALSPAC Executive Committee. You will receive a response within 10 working days to advise you whether your proposal has been approved.

Please note that a standard COVID-19 dataset will be made available at no charge (see description below); however, costs for required paperwork and any bespoke datasets required additional variables will apply.

The code used to conduct data analyses is available at https://github.com/amythomas/AlspacContactsQ1.git

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 13, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Limits of lockdown: characterising essential contacts during strict physical distancing
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Limits of lockdown: characterising essential contacts during strict physical distancing
Amy Thomas, Leon Danon, Hannah Christensen, Kate Northstone, Daniel Smith, Emily Nixon, Adam Trickey, Gibran Hemani, Sarah Sauchelli, Adam Finn, Nicholas Timpson, Ellen Brooks-Pollock
medRxiv 2021.03.12.21253484; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.12.21253484
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Limits of lockdown: characterising essential contacts during strict physical distancing
Amy Thomas, Leon Danon, Hannah Christensen, Kate Northstone, Daniel Smith, Emily Nixon, Adam Trickey, Gibran Hemani, Sarah Sauchelli, Adam Finn, Nicholas Timpson, Ellen Brooks-Pollock
medRxiv 2021.03.12.21253484; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.12.21253484

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (160)
  • Allergy and Immunology (412)
  • Anesthesia (90)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (855)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (157)
  • Dermatology (97)
  • Emergency Medicine (247)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (392)
  • Epidemiology (8542)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (383)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1741)
  • Geriatric Medicine (167)
  • Health Economics (371)
  • Health Informatics (1235)
  • Health Policy (618)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (467)
  • Hematology (196)
  • HIV/AIDS (372)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10274)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (552)
  • Medical Education (192)
  • Medical Ethics (51)
  • Nephrology (210)
  • Neurology (1668)
  • Nursing (97)
  • Nutrition (248)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (325)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (450)
  • Oncology (925)
  • Ophthalmology (263)
  • Orthopedics (100)
  • Otolaryngology (172)
  • Pain Medicine (111)
  • Palliative Medicine (40)
  • Pathology (252)
  • Pediatrics (534)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (246)
  • Primary Care Research (207)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1760)
  • Public and Global Health (3831)
  • Radiology and Imaging (622)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (318)
  • Respiratory Medicine (518)
  • Rheumatology (207)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (165)
  • Sports Medicine (157)
  • Surgery (190)
  • Toxicology (36)
  • Transplantation (100)
  • Urology (74)