ABSTRACT
Objectives To provide a broad evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Ayurveda interventions (procedural and non-procedural) for the management of sinusitis, and also of the relative efficacy and safety of different Ayurveda therapies for Sinusitis.
Methods Two reviewers independently screened search results from electronic databases viz. Cochrane Library, PubMed(central), AYUSH Research Portal, and DHARA for published research articles and Shodhganga, RGUHS library, and ARD-IPGT&RA for the unpublished doctoral thesis. Trial registries (CTRI, Clinicaltrials.gov & WHO-ICTRP), and hand searches were also done for other relevant studies from inception to August 2020.
All comparative clinical trials recruiting sinusitis patients of any age group, receiving Ayurveda intervention, regardless of forms, dosages, ingredients, and mode of interventions, for not less than one week were included. The data extraction and the risk of bias assessment were done by two reviewers independently. Protocol registration number: RD42018103995.
Results We included 10 trials (387 participants) for qualitative analysis and 07 trials (287 participants) for quantitative analysis. Ayurveda intervention demonstrated potential in reducing signs and symptoms of sinusitis compared with placebo (Risk Ratio ranges 6.33 to 12.67, 1 trial, 80 participants). Combined Ayurveda therapy (CT) was statistically more beneficial compared with either procedural or non-procedural Ayurveda therapy alone in reducing symptoms nasal discharge (standardized MD −0.71, 95% CI −1.16 to −0.26, I2 58%, 10 comparisons, 210 participants) and headache (standardized MD −0.44, 95% CI −0.86 to −0.02, I2 56%, 10 comparisons, 218 participants), however, no significant difference was found in reducing symptoms nasal obstruction and loss of smell. Also, there was no significant difference found in similar outcomes while comparing Ayurveda procedural therapy with non-procedural therapy. No numerical data related to the safety of Ayurveda intervention was found in included trials.
Conclusions Despite very low certainty in results (downgraded twice for RoB, once for inconsistency, indirectness, and imprecision each), Ayurveda intervention (CT) may have some beneficial effects in the management of Sinusitis. However, due to insufficient data, we could not conclude on the safety aspect. There is a need for well-designed-executed-reported clinical studies for the generation of evidence.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018103995
Funding Statement
This review was funded by Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences(CCRAS), Ministry of AYUSH, Government of India, and all authors are working as Research officers for this Council.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
As this is a systematic review of published research work, RB/oversight body approval was exempted.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
List of abbreviations
- DHARA
- Digital Helpline for Ayurveda Research Articles
- RGUHS
- Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences
- ARD-IPGT&RA
- Ayurvedic Research Database-Institute for Postgraduate Teaching and Research in Ayurveda
- CTRI
- Clinical Trial Registry India
- WHO-ICTRP
- World Health Organization-International Clinical Trials Registry Platform
- CT
- Combined Ayurveda therapy
- ST
- Single Therapy
- PT
- Procedural Therapy
- NPT
- Non-Procedural Therapy
- OPD
- Outpatient department
- IPD
- Inpatient department
- SMD
- Standardized Mean Difference
- SDs
- Standard deviations
- CI
- Confidance Inerval
- RR
- Risk ratio
- RS
- Rhinosinusitis
- CRS
- Chronic Rhinosinusitis
- ARC
- Acute rhinosinusitis
- PRISMA
- Preferred Reporting Guideline for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines
- PROSPERO
- International prospective register of systematic reviews
- RCTs
- Randomized controlled trials
- nRCTs
- Non-randomized trials
- SAE
- Serious adverse events
- AE
- Adverse events
- ADR
- Adverse drug reaction
- P.G.
- Post Graduate
- RoB
- Risk of Bias
- ROBINS-I
- Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions
- GRADE
- Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation
- CBC
- Complete Blood Count
- PICOT
- Population, Intervention, Control, Timepoint
- SoF
- Summary of Finding
- CONSORT
- Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials
- CCRAS
- Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences
- IIPH
- Indian Institute of Public Health
- AA
- Azeem Ahmad
- MG
- Manohar Gundeti
- PD
- Parth Dave
- SJ
- Sophia Jameela
- BCS
- Bhogavalli Chandrashekhar Rao
- SK
- Shruti Khanduri
- SN
- Srikanth Narayanam