Abstract
Clinical treatments are mostly the result of consecutive success of medical procedures. The patterns in those procedures lead to creation of clinical guidelines which are currently essential to have better health treatments. The use of electronic health record systems (EHR) helps the patient management, but it fails in the treatment guidance due to the lack of clinical decision support systems. Although these systems have decision-making features incorporated, they are not designed for treatment management and guidance. In some top edge systems, this functionality was improved and integrated, but either they are tight to the typically complex EHR. Or, many times the independent solutions lack generality to support users and disease-specific protocols.
In this paper, we purpose a decision support web tool which works independently from EHR systems. This solution allows clinicians to build and manage rule-based clinical protocols, by facilitating health care treatments, reducing time, and increasing medication accuracy. Moreover, it also enables protocol sharing among distinct institutions and physicians, creating a larger database of clinical guidelines and a network of speciliased physicians in types of diseases.
The proposed system was evaluated with the implementation of distinct clinical protocols, from different medical fields. In this validation, we describe all the steps in the transformation of a clinical guideline, from the traditional format, into a ready-to-use protocol with guidance and recommendation features.
The purposed system was developed with the collaboration of health professionals from different Portuguese healthcare institutions, which helped in the identification of system requirements and gaps of the current systems.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
JRA is funded by the National Science Foundation (FCT), under the grant SFRH/BD/147837/2019.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This is a software solution that does not required the IRB approval
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
No datasets were used in this manuscript
