Abstract
Background Mosquito control is the most effective means of reducing Aedes aegypti infections worldwide. In many developing countries, however, vector management programmes fail to reach their goals due to low worker productivity. Research suggests that financial incentives may increase the productivity of health personnel, yet there is little evidence about the impact of monetary rewards on A. aegypti-reduction strategies. We evaluated whether individual and collective financial incentives improve the performance of healthcare workers fighting A. aegypti, as well as their effect on city-level numbers of dengue hospitalisations.
Methodology/Principal findings We hired and trained subjects to visit households, find A. aegypti breeding sites, and eliminate mosquito larvae in the city of Rio Verde, Brazil. We randomly assigned workers into three groups. The control group received a flat compensation for their tasks, while workers in the two treatment groups received individual and collective monetary bonuses, respectively. Financial rewards increased the number of cleaned breeding sites in both treatment groups (individual and team bonuses), and the collective treatment also improved larvae extermination. The intervention lowered dengue hospitalisations in 10.3%, but the result was not consistent across all model specifications.
Conclusions/Significance A. aegypti control programmes may benefit from alternative compensation schemes, especially when provided to teams. For this strategy to succeed, financial incentives have to be distributed widely as their aggregate effect is limited. More research is needed to assess whether higher worker productivity decreases dengue hospitalisations.
Author Summary Diseases transmitted by the Aedes aegypti mosquito, such as chikungunya, dengue, yellow fever, and Zika, continue to affect thousands of people per year. As there are no safe vaccines for most of these infections, insecticide spraying and breeding site elimination are the best means to fight the mosquito. In several developing countries, which host the majority of A. aegypti infections, anti-mosquito campaigns are carried out inconsistently, thus it is crucial to find ways to improve the productivity of healthcare workers in charge of these tasks. We designed a randomised field experiment that provided individual and collective financial incentives to healthcare agents in a Brazilian city, and we tested the effect of monetary rewards on their productivity and on city-level dengue hospitalisations. We find that financial bonuses improved the number of cleaned breeding sites in both treatment groups (individual and team incentives) and that the collective treatment also improved larvae extermination. The impact of our treatment on city-level hospitalisations was not consistent across all specifications. In sum, financial incentives may be used to boost field productivity in anti-A. aegypti programmes, but further research is required to evaluate how healthcare worker productivity impacts dengue outcomes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
EGAP pre-registry tool (#20180504AA)
Funding Statement
We thank the FGV Applied Research Centre for funding this research
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
We received IRB from the New York University and Fundacao Getulio Vargas. - NYU IRB number: IRB-FY2017-17 - FGV IRB number: IRB-01/2017
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
* We thank Taylor Boas, Saad Gulzar, Cathy Hafer, Daniel Hidalgo, Dimitri Landa, Rebecca Morton, Adam Przeworski, Catarina Roman, Renard Sexton, David Skarbek, Denis Stukal, and participants at EGAP, MPSA, NYU PE Seminar, and SPSA for their valuable comments. We also thank the FGV Applied Research Centre for funding this research. Each named author has equally contributed to conducting the underlying research and drafting this manuscript. To the best of our knowledge, the authors have no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise. Replication materials are available at http://github.com/danilofreire/incentives-healthcare.
Data Availability
Replication materials are available at http://github.com/danilofreire/incentives-healthcare.
