Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Stage 3 COVID-19 Vaccines using Knowledge Representation

View ORCID ProfileJavier Burgos-Salcedo
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.07.21253082
Javier Burgos-Salcedo
1Corporación para la Investigación y la Innovación-CIINAS
2Fundación Universitaria San Mateo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Javier Burgos-Salcedo
  • For correspondence: jdburgoss@corporacionciinas.org
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The emergence of a novel SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus at the end of 2019 and its accelerated spread worldwide to become a pandemic has had, from the medical biotechnology point of view, an unprecedented global response, to the point that there are currently 176 vaccine candidates in preclinical stage, 66 in clinical stage, of which 19 are in phase 3, and 5 of these are massively applied worldwide. The purpose of the present work is to elaborate a hierarchical landscape of the current status of phase 3 vaccines, taking into account their attributes of technological platform, safety and efficacy. The methodology used was that of conceptual knowledge representation, resulting in, firstly, an appropriate classification of stage 3 vaccines, The Conceptual Lattice for COVID-19 vaccines, constructed according to how they relate to each other with respect to the set of their attributes. Secondly, the approach used allows proposing rational strategies for the design of heterologous vaccination schemes, which are urgently needed to control the pandemic.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

there are not external funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

CIINAS CORPORATION

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

there are no new data associated with this paper

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 09, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Stage 3 COVID-19 Vaccines using Knowledge Representation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Stage 3 COVID-19 Vaccines using Knowledge Representation
Javier Burgos-Salcedo
medRxiv 2021.03.07.21253082; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.07.21253082
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Stage 3 COVID-19 Vaccines using Knowledge Representation
Javier Burgos-Salcedo
medRxiv 2021.03.07.21253082; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.07.21253082

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (227)
  • Allergy and Immunology (500)
  • Anesthesia (110)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1226)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (205)
  • Dermatology (147)
  • Emergency Medicine (282)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (526)
  • Epidemiology (9990)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (496)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2430)
  • Geriatric Medicine (236)
  • Health Economics (479)
  • Health Informatics (1632)
  • Health Policy (750)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (632)
  • Hematology (247)
  • HIV/AIDS (528)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11840)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (623)
  • Medical Education (250)
  • Medical Ethics (73)
  • Nephrology (267)
  • Neurology (2266)
  • Nursing (139)
  • Nutrition (348)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (449)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (532)
  • Oncology (1241)
  • Ophthalmology (375)
  • Orthopedics (133)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (154)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (324)
  • Pediatrics (727)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (311)
  • Primary Care Research (280)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2272)
  • Public and Global Health (4814)
  • Radiology and Imaging (832)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (486)
  • Respiratory Medicine (649)
  • Rheumatology (283)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (237)
  • Sports Medicine (224)
  • Surgery (266)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (123)
  • Urology (99)