Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in care home staff: a survey of Liverpool care homes

View ORCID ProfileJohn S P Tulloch, Karen Lawrenson, Adam L Gordon, Sam Ghebrehewet, Matthew Ashton, Steve Peddie, Paula Parvulescu
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.07.21252972
John S P Tulloch
1Institute of Infection, Veterinary, and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for John S P Tulloch
Karen Lawrenson
2Public Health Department, Liverpool City Council, Liverpool, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adam L Gordon
3School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sam Ghebrehewet
4Public Health England North West, Cheshire & Merseyside Health Protection Team, Liverpool, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew Ashton
2Public Health Department, Liverpool City Council, Liverpool, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steve Peddie
5Adult Social Care Department, Liverpool City Council, Liverpool, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paula Parvulescu
2Public Health Department, Liverpool City Council, Liverpool, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: paula.parvulescu@liverpool.gov.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background COVID-19 has caused high morbidity and mortality in UK care homes. Vaccinating staff members and residents will protect care homes from severe clinical cases. Uptake of COVID-19 vaccine first doses in care homes has been higher among residents compared to staff members.

Methods We aimed to identify causes of lower COVID-19 vaccine uptake amongst care home staff members within the Liverpool City Council region. An anonymised online survey was distributed to all care home managers between the 21st and the 29th of January 2021. Descriptive analysis was performed on responses.

Results 46/87 (53%) of Liverpool care homes responded. The mean staff vaccination rate per home was 51.4% (95% CI 43.9-58.8%). The most common reasons for staff not receiving the vaccine were: concerns about lack of vaccine research (37.0%), staff being off-site during vaccination sessions (36.5%), pregnancy and fertility concerns (5.6%), and concerns about allergic reactions (3.2%). Care home managers reported the necessity to combat vaccine hesitancy through meetings and conversations with health professionals, and provision of supporting evidence to dispel vaccine misinformation.

Conclusions Vaccine hesitancy was the main cause for reduced vaccine uptake among care home staff members. These concerns could be addressed by targeted evidence-based training, and a public health communication campaign to build vaccine confidence and increase acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines. The speed of vaccination roll-out has also led to unexpected logistical issues that lowered vaccine uptake rates. Addressing both these challenges could increase uptake by more than 40%.

Key Points

  • COVID-19 vaccine uptake rates are lower in staff than residents

  • Three main causes of reduced uptake have been identified: vaccine hesitancy, logistical issues, and medical concerns.

  • The main reasons for vaccine hesitancy were concerns about limited research into vaccine safety, and concerns about long-term impact on pregnancy and fertility.

  • Addressing care home staff vaccination concerns should be given priority in these settings.

Competing Interest Statement

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; JSPT has been contracted to provide epidemiological support to Liverpool City Council during the COVID-19 pandemic; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. Views expressed are the authors own.

Funding Statement

No external funding was received

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

These data were collected as part of routine public health service evaluation by Liverpool City Council. Fully anonymised data were provided to JT for secondary data analysis. As such, the University of Liverpool ethics department confirmed that review by the University of Liverpool research ethics committee was not needed (see http://www.hra-decisiontools.org.uk/research/docs/DefiningResearchTable_Oct2017-1.pdf).

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data is available upon reasonable request to Liverpool City Council

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 08, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in care home staff: a survey of Liverpool care homes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in care home staff: a survey of Liverpool care homes
John S P Tulloch, Karen Lawrenson, Adam L Gordon, Sam Ghebrehewet, Matthew Ashton, Steve Peddie, Paula Parvulescu
medRxiv 2021.03.07.21252972; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.07.21252972
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in care home staff: a survey of Liverpool care homes
John S P Tulloch, Karen Lawrenson, Adam L Gordon, Sam Ghebrehewet, Matthew Ashton, Steve Peddie, Paula Parvulescu
medRxiv 2021.03.07.21252972; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.07.21252972

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (269)
  • Allergy and Immunology (551)
  • Anesthesia (135)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1751)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (238)
  • Dermatology (172)
  • Emergency Medicine (312)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (655)
  • Epidemiology (10790)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (585)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2938)
  • Geriatric Medicine (286)
  • Health Economics (532)
  • Health Informatics (1921)
  • Health Policy (833)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (744)
  • Hematology (291)
  • HIV/AIDS (628)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12506)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (686)
  • Medical Education (299)
  • Medical Ethics (86)
  • Nephrology (324)
  • Neurology (2788)
  • Nursing (151)
  • Nutrition (432)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (556)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (597)
  • Oncology (1460)
  • Ophthalmology (442)
  • Orthopedics (172)
  • Otolaryngology (255)
  • Pain Medicine (190)
  • Palliative Medicine (56)
  • Pathology (380)
  • Pediatrics (865)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (363)
  • Primary Care Research (334)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2635)
  • Public and Global Health (5349)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1006)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (595)
  • Respiratory Medicine (725)
  • Rheumatology (329)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (289)
  • Sports Medicine (278)
  • Surgery (327)
  • Toxicology (47)
  • Transplantation (149)
  • Urology (125)