ABSTRACT
Objectives The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of BAME community leaders in relation to - the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their communities; and BAME community’s perception, understanding and adherence to Government guidelines on COVID-19 public health measures.
Design A phenomenological approach was adopted using qualitative semi-structured interviews.
Settings Community organisations and places of worships in the West Midlands region of England.
Participants Community leaders were recruited through organisations representing BAME communities and religious places of worship.
Results A total of 19 participants took part. Participants alluded to historical and structural differences for the observed disparities in COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. Many struggled with lockdown measures which impeded cultural and religious gatherings that were deemed to be integral to the community. Cultural and social practices led to many suffering on their own as discussion of mental health was still deemed a taboo within many communities. Many expressed their community’s reluctance to report symptoms for the fear of financial and physical health implications. They reported increase in hate crime which was deemed to be exacerbated due to perceived insensitive messaging from authority officials and historical structural biases. Access and adherence to government guidelines was an issue for many due to language and digital barriers. Reinforcement from trusted community and religious leaders encouraged adherence. Points of support such as food banks were vital in ensuring essential supplies during the pandemic. Many could not afford masks and sanitisers.
Conclusion The study highlights the perceived impact of COVID-19 pandemic on BAME communities. Government agencies and public health agencies need to integrate with the community, and community leaders to penetrate the key messages and deliver targeted yet sensitive public health advice which incorporates cultural and religious practices. Addressing route cause of disparities is imperative to mitigate current and future pandemics.
Strengths and limitations of this study
To our knowledge, this is the first study in England to investigate the understanding of risk and impact of COVID-19 using the perspectives of BAME community leaders.
Participants represented diverse BAME community organisations and places of worship.
Participant recruitment was limited to one of the seven regions within England with the highest proportion of BAME populations.
Results may not be generalizable to any BAME communities not represented in the data.
INTRODUCTION
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) was declared a global pandemic in March 2020, with over 120,000 deaths from the virus in the UK as of February 2021.1 There was early recognition that Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) groups in the UK were disproportionately affected, 2,3 which came to public attention when the first ten doctors who had died from COVID-19 were of BAME origin.4 During the first wave in April 2020, approximately 35% of almost 2,000 intensive care patients for COVID-19 in England, Wales and Northern Ireland were non-White.5 However, BAME groups only constitute 13% of the UK’s population.6 Recent estimates suggest that Chinese, Indian, Pakistani, other Asian, Black Caribbean and other Black ethnicity had between 10-50% higher mortality risk compared to the White British population.7
Historically, health inequalities have been a concern for BAME groups; for example, disparity has been observed through higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease in South Asian communities.8 The concept is defined as “avoidable and unfair differences” shaped by their surrounding circumstances, namely wider determinants of health.9 Factors such as socio-economic status, cultural practices and environmental conditions –which are largely influenced by structural biases based on ethnicity, collectively drive inequalities. Whilst literature reinforces the understanding that BAME groups are disproportionately affected by COVID-19, there is a lack of research that aims to understand the disparity from the perspectives of BAME communities.
Urgency of further study into the association between ethnicity and COVID-19 was highlighted in research and policy domains in early 2020. Data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) proposed that existing co-morbidities in BAME COVID-19 patients could have contributed towards the disparity.10 However, the debate later incorporated wider social and structural disparities. Factors such as deprivation, living conditions, nature of employment were linked to higher morbidity and mortality in BAME populations.11
In addition to the disparities in morbidity and mortality directly as a result of COVID-19, anecdotal media reports have stated that BAME communities have been under protected, stigmatised during this pandemic.12 Currently there is a sparse literature exploring the understanding of BAME groups on how they, themselves, perceive their disparity in COVID-19. To mitigate the pandemic and its impact, diverse information were disseminated through social and broadcast media by the UK Government and public health organisations. Slogans such as ‘Stay Home, Protect the NHS, Save Lives’ endeavoured to support the first national lockdown in the UK. During this period, non-essential businesses, community organisations and places of worship, which are integral to many BAME communities, were inaccessible.13 Downloadable translations of key documents, including posters for COVID-19 symptoms were made available in England through Public Health England in eleven different languages.14 However, BAME communities’ understanding of pandemic-related communication from the Government and public health organisations has not yet been investigated.
The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of BAME community leaders in relation to: the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their communities; and BAME community’s perception, understanding and adherence to Government guidelines on COVID-19 public health measures.
METHODS
Design
A phenomenological approach using qualitative study design was adopted.15
Study population, sampling strategy and recruitment
Leader or representatives of the organisations, businesses and places of worship serving a predominantly BAME community in the West Midlands region of England, a region that suffered most BAME related hospital admissions and mortality, were searched online, then invited via email or telephone. Organisations were identified through internet, social media search and acquaintance of the research team (all representing BAME communities). Those expressing interest were emailed a Participant Information Sheet and Consent Form. Additional recruitment was made through snowball sampling. The ethnic groups of interest (Electronic supplementary material 1) were of those recommended by the UK Government.16
Ethical approval and consent
Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Birmingham School of Pharmacy Ethics Committee (reference number UoB/SoP/2020-64). Informed consent was received from all participants.
Data collection material and methods
An interview topic guide (Electronic supplementary material 2) was developed with 19 open-ended questions on three key areas regarding BAME community’s: (1) understanding of acquiring COVID-19 risk and disparity in health outcomes; (2) beliefs and perspectives relating to COVID-19; and (3) understanding and adherence to Government-issued guidance and public health measures on COVID-19. Probes elicited a comprehensive insight from participants. To test face and content validity, the research team developed questions based on existing literature and a pilot interview was conducted with a BAME community member which ensured clarity of the questions. No changes had to be made to the topic guide.
Participants were recruited and interviewed between October - November 2020 for approximately 45 minutes over Zoom or telephone. Relevant demographic information was collected prior to the interview. Interviews were audio-recorded using the recording function on Zoom or a digital voice recorder, respectively.
Data processing and analysis
Recordings were transcribed verbatim into Microsoft Word. Data was anonymised to remove any identifiable information. Transcripts were exported onto Microsoft Excel and then thematically analysed by two researchers (FM and VP) using framework technique.17–19 The initial coding was reviewed between the research team through analysis of first two transcripts before an agreed version that could be applied to the rest of the transcripts. New themes were as they emerged during the subsequent analysis of other transcripts.
Reporting was conducted to comply with the COREQ guideline20 and checklist (electronic supplement material 3).
Patient and public involvement
Apart from members of public’s participation in the research as study subjects, no other PPI activities were conducted for this research due to time and resource constraints.
RESULTS
A total of 19 participants from various community leadership roles and BAME representations took part (table 1). Four overarching themes and 11 subthemes were identified (tables 2–5). Themes related to a) perceived impact of COVID-19 and lockdown on wellbeing b) understanding of risk and disparity in health outcomes for COVID-19; c) perception, understanding and adherence to Government guidance in relation to COVID-19; d) accessibility and use of community services, and other points of support, during the pandemic. Narrative summaries of each theme are presented below and illustrative quotes are presented in tables 2, 3, 4 and 5 dedicated to each theme.
A) Perceived impact of COVID-19 and lockdown on wellbeing
Mental health impact and psychological wellbeing
This was widely expressed by all participants, with feelings of anxiety being exacerbated by social isolation appearing to culminate in emotional fatigue, owing to the longevity of the pandemic. Participants alluded to the close knit nature of the BAME communities and the pandemic and the lockdown had an immense impact on their social wellbeing. Some also reported that women within families may have suffered a notable impact due to additional strain from domestic responsibilities during lockdown (table 2).
Whilst participants differed in their perspectives on whether adequate mental health support was available during and after the first national lockdown, all recognised that further education within their respective communities was required to break the taboo that presented a barrier to expressing emotion, and encourage those who require support to actively seek it. Participants of Asian and Black African communities described that mental health was still deemed a taboo within the communities and many had to suffer in isolation (table 2).
Financial impact
The subsequent financial impact from the national lockdown was an overriding concern for BAME communities, particularly for those on lower incomes and in self-employment. Financial insecurity as a result of the pandemic was especially difficult for families, as several participants mentioned that many in their communities were reliant on Government welfare (table 2).
Physical health impact
Current and future physical health was a concern expressed by many participants (table 2). They recognised that their communities are often predisposed to certain chronic conditions which may result in worse outcomes, due to the current treatment prioritisation of COVID-19. Examples described related to the impact on the ongoing treatment of patients with sickle cell anaemia, thalassemia and prostate cancer that were deemed to be highly prevalent amongst Black African communities. Therefore, those with underlying conditions were taking extra precautions to maintain optimum health, should they be affected by COVID-19.
Leaders mentioned their community’s fear of being admitted to hospital due to the worry of potentially dying away from loved ones. Mistrust in the health services appeared to be propagated by social media and prior negative experiences in healthcare; this stopped many from self-reporting if they had symptoms (table 2).
Social impact
Some participants reported an increase in targeted online hate crime, perhaps due to media representation of their community during this pandemic (table 2). The high prevalence of COVID-19 in BAME communities and the media representations have resurfaced historic structural biases against their community, with some commenting strongly on the perceived discrimination. Similarly, leaders noted the perceived lack of support for their respective BAME groups regarding COVID-19 and its effects.
Participants also described the taboo within their own communities meant many were suffering in isolation. Many would also be unwilling to report symptoms if it meant that they would have to self-isolate, due to consequent financial loss and, sometimes, stigmatisation from fellow community members (table 2).
Leaders expressed their communities’ struggles with restrictions on social distancing and lockdown measures that had greatly impacted on what would otherwise be high-volume cultural and religious gatherings, from festivities to funerals (table 2).
B) Understanding of risk and disparity in health outcomes for COVID-19
Acceptance, scepticism and ignorance
Participants spoke of varying degrees of acceptance, with most describing their communities accepting their increased risk of transmission, infection and worse health outcomes compared to the White British population. However, scepticism of the virus’s impact was expressed by the participants, particularly due to the disproportionate death toll in the UK compared to their native country (table 3). All mentioned that the greatest health impact was on those who were elderly and vulnerable within their community, including those with underlying health conditions and disabilities (table 3).
Perceptions around ethnic, cultural, societal and environmental contexts as risk factors
Neighbourhood deprivation was commonly described, with many commenting on poor lifestyles and socioeconomic status fuelling the disparity (table 3). This was linked to education level and employment nature, especially for those in the service sector with high public exposure. Participants discussed multigenerational living contributing towards the high prevalence. For younger generations who were conscious of the risk, it was reported that some may have struggled to communicate this to elders within their family and wider community due to cultural hierarchies (table 3).
C) Perception, understanding and adherence to Government guidance in relation to COVID-19
Understanding and clarity
Almost all participants stated that Government guidance was inconsistent and lacked clarity. The subsequent effect was worsened for community members who were not fluent in English, with translated guidance lacking in forms that could be accessed and understood by all. This, combined with the community’s close-knit nature, was reported to have perhaps influenced their interpretation of social distancing guidelines between households (table 4).
Poor outreach
Digital exclusivity exacerbated weak understanding, with leaders mentioning that the pandemic revealed the lack of digital access for their most deprived (table 4). Participants described how they took on the role of disseminating Government guidance; a common sentiment was that of wonder to how else their community would have received such information without their input. Some mentioned that media representation and comments by Government officials made their community feel marginalised, as it sometimes appeared to be targeted directly towards particular ethnic groups (table 4).
Adherence, or lack of, to Government guidance
Participants deemed that communities in more deprived areas appearing to have weaker uptake of guidelines. Other risk avoidance behaviours included the use of home remedies, which were perceived to have great benefit and were linked to cultural and religious practices (table 4).
Facilitators affecting adherence including personal value, such as being able to resume congregational worship. Reinforcement from local authority and trusted community and religious leaders encouraged adherence. In contrast, the simplicity of some guidelines (wearing face masks and avoiding non-essential travel) appeared to make some question the necessity of abiding by them, especially when Government officials were also seen to publicly break the rules without consequence (table 4).
D) Accessibility and use of community services, and other points of support, during the pandemic
Accessibility and lack of resources
Some mentioned their community had restricted or no access to culturally-appropriate service providers and places of worship that they would normally frequent. Many commented on inadequate access to General Practitioners, a healthcare professional their community holds in high regard and would usually turn to (table 5).
Points of support
All commented on their community’s feeling of servitude towards each other during the pandemic (table 5). Family and friends were reported to be the immediate support network. As lockdown restrictions eased, community centres and places of worship were stated to have responded to their local’s needs by launching services, such as food banks and befriending projects, which were not previously required (table 5).
DISCUSSION
The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on BAME communities. The findings reveal the inequalities as experienced by leaders of diverse BAME communities. Participants alluded to the disparities in infection rates and outcomes to historical and structural differences. Many community members experienced racism and stigmatisation during the pandemic. Cultural and social practices within the communities led to many suffering on their own as discussion of mental health was still deemed a taboo within many BAME communities.
Participants identified their community members faced barriers to adherence to government guidelines. Lack of English proficiency particularly contributed to this. Despite translated documents, there was often an issue of illiteracy in the native language for some community members, with a number of participants mentioning the need for interpreters to verbally deliver guidance. It is known that deliverance of Government guidelines was markedly affected by digital exclusion. In 2019, only 10.6% of White ethnic groups in the West Midlands were found to be “internet non-users”, whilst the collective percentage for all other ethnic groups (as included in our study) was reported at 39.9%.21 In addition, some participants described that lack of access to sanitizers and masks during the early phase of the pandemic led to further difficulties in adherence for the most disadvantaged in their community.
Stigmatisation of mental health has frequently been documented within BAME communities; this perceived barrier to seeking support from peers or professionals were described by our study participants. Our findings also revealed a mental health impact from the lockdown particularly on women with familial responsibilities in BAME communities. This also extended to the lack of adequate bereavement support. Many communities could not grieve as usual due to lockdown restrictions. For instance, the Muslim community initially could not perform burial rites within 24 hours, an otherwise-expected practice. This was quickly ameliorated by emergency Government legislation which respected the community’s wishes.22 Such practice from authority level should be implemented for other minority ethnic groups regarding the particular challenges their communities face during this pandemic.
Participants described overcrowding due to multi-generational living as a risk factor for the observed disparities and contributor to weak adherence of social distancing guidelines. Many alluded to poor housing conditions. The ONS have reported that only 2% of White British households are overcrowded, compared to 10% for other ethnic groups.23 Participants also commented on the nature of employment their community members typically hold, including key worker roles during the pandemic (such as transport operatives and hospital porters) overexposed them to the virus.24 High prevalence of such employment amongst BAME communities have been linked to poorer education levels associated with historic structural biases and systemic inequality. 24This is reiterated by research stating that such factors interplay with ethnicity, resulting in poor health for minority ethnic groups.25
Strength and limitations
To our knowledge, this was the first study to investigate the understanding of risk and impact of COVID-19 using the perspectives of BAME community leaders in England. An extensive variety of community leaders were recruited through an intensive search of BAME community organisations, businesses and places of worship. Thus, key informants could share the experiences of COVID-19 pandemic on their BAME community through the study’s qualitative design. The interviewing-researcher’s own BAME origin may have also allowed participants to openly discuss sensitive issues, thus eliciting detailed perspectives.
Duplicate analysis of interviews provided rigour, and data saturation was assumed after 19 participants since no new themes had emerged. However, these findings are not representative of all BAME groups. For example, we could not recruit anyone from East Asian communities. Leaders not of BAME origin themselves but who could speak on behalf on BAME communities (such as councillors of White ethnicity representing a West Midlands constituency with a high ethnic demographic) were approached, but we did not receive response from anyone available to participate. Moreover, our methodology’s use of Government-standardised ethnic grouping was very broad, but our results indicated that the experiences of this pandemic varied hugely across different ethnicities that would be classed together. For instance, the Somali diaspora in inner-city Birmingham had very different understanding and experiences of COVID-19 compared to the Caribbean community in outskirt boroughs.
Although not an aim of this study, there is weakness in its lack of generalisability as it was limited to a geographical region within England. However, this region represents the second highest proportion of BAME populations within England.26
Implications for practice and research
Further work needs to be urgently undertaken during this ongoing pandemic to improve adherence to the Government guidelines within BAME communities and mitigate the disproportionate impact of COVID-19. This includes increasing outreach and providing logistical and financial support at a grassroots level to the most vulnerable in already-marginalised communities. Public health guidance must be produced in different languages and dialects through accessible media, not only on how to stay safe from COVID-19 but to also challenge myths propagated by social media. Public health campaigns should incorporate nuances that BAME communities can resonate with, such as the perceived benefit of home remedies, to deliver targeted but culturally sensitive interventions. All aforementioned recommendations should be implemented with cooperation between health services and trusted community networks, religious leaders and local stakeholders. This approach would be beneficial in other global or national public health interventions and any future pandemics, should they occur.
Future research could investigate which intra-demographic characteristics within a certain BAME community affect their perceptions and impact of COVID-19, and to what extent. This includes factors identified by this study, such as cultural hierarchies. The collective addressing of all non-White demographics into one overarching BAME category should also be questioned and adapted, as this study has demonstrated that one solution will not encompass the needs of all BAME communities. Perspectives of other population groups who are likely to face multiple social disadvantage during the time of pandemic such as the homeless populations,27–29 refugees30 and single people living31 needs to be researched.
CONCLUSION
BAME community leader participants of this study alluded to historical and structural differences for the observed disparities in COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. In addition, cultural and social practices within the communities led to many suffering on their own as discussion of mental health was still deemed a taboo within many communities. Racial discriminations added to their worries during the pandemic. Reinforcement from trusted community and religious leaders encouraged adherence to government guidelines. Points of support such as food banks were vital in ensuring essential supplies during the pandemic. Government agencies and public health bodies need to integrate with the community, and community leaders to penetrate the key messages and deliver targeted yet sensitive public health advice which incorporates cultural and religious practices. Addressing route cause of disparities is imperative to mitigate current and future pandemics. These must be addressed by using appropriate and targeted public health interventions. Such interventions should be emboldened by the governmental sphere foremost, then perpetuated by local authority in collaboration with community leaders. Ultimately, all strategies must be guided by BAME communities themselves in order to successfully meet their needs.
Data Availability
All relevant data pertaining to this manuscript are presented in the manuscript and the electronic supplementary materials.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author contributions
FM, VP and DA co-designed the study. FM conducted all interviews and transcribed the data. FM and VP conducted the analysis in duplicate to which DA and KK added their input through expert comments. FM led the write up of the manuscript to which all authors contributed through editing and expert comments. All authors agree to the final version of the manuscript.
Competing interests
Apart from authors themselves representing diverse BAME backgrounds, there are no other conflict of interests to declare.
Checklist
This work follows COREQ recommendations and is reported as per the COREQ checklist. (Electronic Supplement 3)
Data availability
All relevant data pertaining to this manuscript are presented in the manuscript and the electronic supplementary materials.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to every participant for their time and support in this study, without whom this research could not have been conducted.
REFERENCES
