SARS-CoV-2 infection in households with and without young children: Nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Infection with the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 only has limited treatment options(1–3) and immunity against the virus is globally very limited(4). Nevertheless, it is suggested that recent exposure to seasonally spreading human coronaviruses (HCoVs, e.g. OC43 and NL63), which is particularly prevalent among young children during winter months(5), might result in protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection(6,7). Furthermore, studies report serological evidence of pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 binding antibodies(8) and T-cell immunity(9–11) in individuals not infected with SARS-CoV-2, thought to arise from previous HCoV infection. However, humoral immunity against HCoVs is short-lived and immunological cross-reactivity of HCoVs against SARS-CoV-2 may not be sterilizing(12). It is therefore unknown if, and to which degree, recent exposure to HCoVs reduces SARS-CoV-2 infection risk or disease severity.

Taking advantage of complete individual-level data on inhabitants of all households in Denmark and nationwide information on all laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections and hospitalizations, we explored the role of exposure to HCoVs on risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization, using living in a household with young children as a proxy for recent HCoV exposure.

METHODS

RESULTS

In our cohort of 3,079,736 adults living in Denmark aged 18 to 60 years, 449,915 (14.6%) lived in households with young children aged ten months to five years, while 2,629,821 (85.4%) lived in households without young children (Table 1). Adults living with young children were, on average, younger (median age 35 versus 42 years), and more often female (54% versus 49%) than adults not living with young children. For both groups, the most predominant household type consisted of two adults (86% among adults living with young children and 49% among adults not living young children). For the group of adults in households with young children, 76%, 23%, and 1% lived with one, two, or three or more young children, respectively. For adults in households with any children below 18 years, 35%, 48%, and 18% lived with one, two, or three or more children, respectively. Medical comorbidities, as defined from nationwide hospital diagnostic codes, were more common among individuals not living in households with young children, except for inflammatory bowel disease and renal failure.

When investigating risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in adults living in households with young children compared with adults living in households without young children, we found overall an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.05 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.09) of SARS-CoV-2 infection (Table 2). When stratifying by number of young children in the household we found an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.03 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.07), 1.13 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.21), 1.42 (95% CI, 1.09 to 1.84), of SARS-CoV-2 infection for living in a household with one, two, or three or more children, respectively, compared with individuals in households with no young children (P = 0.002 for trend).

Investigating the risk of SARS-CoV-2 hospitalization among SARS-CoV-2-positive adults by household status, we found a non-significant decreased risk of SARS-CoV-2 hospitalization among adults living in households with any number of young children compared with adults living without young children in the household (adjusted hazard ratio 0.84, 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.03) (Table 3). When stratifying by number of young children in the household we found an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.70 to 1.09) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.52 to 1.09) of SARS-CoV-2 hospitalization for adults living with one, or two or more children, respectively, compared with adults in households with no young children (P = 0.47 for trend).

Further, we explored the role of adult age, gender, and time-period of testing (Table S2), and found the relative SARS-CoV-2 infection risk to be noticeably higher among adults aged 30-39 years sharing a household with young children (adjusted hazard ratio 1.14 (95% CI, 1.08 to 1.19)) in comparison with other age strata, and especially high during early reopening of society following lockdown (April 29-June 30, 2020), adjusted hazard ratio of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.44). In addition, we found evidence of a significant, but small, gender effect, with higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among men compared with women (P = 0.04 for interaction). Scrutinizing effects of age-span definition of young children, household definition of children, presence of older and younger children in the household (Table S3-S6), we found strong evidence of increased SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among adults with older children in the household, regardless of the presence of young children in the household (adjusted hazard ratio of 1.31 (95% CI, 1.24 to 1.37)) or not (adjusted hazard ratio of 1.31 (95% CI, 1.27 to 1.35)). In households with only young children, a clear pattern persisted of increased risk of infection by increasing number of young children. Different definitions of age span of young children and number of children in the household (i.e. inclusion or exclusion of non-legal children) did not markedly alter the effect of young children on SARS-CoV-2 infection risk. Additionally, we examined the role of number of adults in the household (Table S7). When stratifying by number of household adults, we found a heterogeneous pattern, where in households with two adults, there was no increased relative risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in households with young children, while we observed an increased relative risk in households with one or three or more adults. Finally, as a last sensitivity analysis, we investigated SARS-CoV-2 testing intensity by household type (Table S8). We found a 9% increased testing rate in households with young children compared with households without young children. However, adjusting for testing intensity had minimal impact on our main finding, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.05 (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.09) for any young child when adjusted for tests within the latest 60 days.

To illustrate relative effects of child age, we plotted cubic splines of SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in adults living in households with children by child age and total number of children in the household relative to having one child aged six years (Figure 1). Overall, higher child age and higher number of children was associated with an additive increased relative risk of infection.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1.

Relative risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in adults living in households with children by child age and total number of children in the household relative to having one child aged six years. Adjusted for age, gender, urbanicity, ethnicity, and comorbidities.

DISCUSSION

In a nationwide cohort study of all adults in Denmark aged 18 to 60 years, living in households with young children was associated with a small, but significant, increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, compared with adults not living in households with young children, adjusting for potential confounders. The risk of infection was amplified with increasing number of young children living in the household, but the overall association was attenuated when excluding households with older children. Overall, the results suggest no reduced SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in individuals with recent exposure to HCoVs.

Our study is, to our knowledge, the first study of household characteristics and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk enrolling an entire population of more than three million individuals. Furthermore, the study likely captures the vast majority of SARS-CoV-2 infections in Denmark during most of the study period, as Denmark has one of the highest PCR testing rates in Europe(15). This is reflected in the low positivity rate of SARS-CoV-2 tests of 2% from late-April to the end of follow-up in mid-November 2020 (Figure S1).

Our study has some limitations. We did not have serological measurements of B-cell or T-cell immunity to HCoVs, which could offer direct biological evidence of preexisting immunity against SARS-CoV-2 following prior exposure to HCoVs, but co-habitation with young children has been considered a reasonable proxy for recent exposure to HCoVs previously(7). Furthermore, we did not include information on SARS-CoV-2 testing of young children. However, young children are often asymptomatic or present with mild symptoms of infection(21), thus inclusion of this information would introduce undesirable health-seeking behavior bias into our analyses.

Our findings show that having young children in one’s household was associated with a slightly increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The association could be a result of a higher number of social contacts among adults living in households with young children (e.g. more adults in the household, contact to daycare facilities, or close contact to parents of playmates) or due to infection brought into the household by the young children. Nevertheless, when we stratified by number of adults in the household we found no indication that an increased number of adults in the household was the driving force behind increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, we found a heterogeneous pattern according to which the lowest relative risk of infection was in households with two adults, indicating that social circumstances, and not the household number of adults per se, is the most important factor in determining household infection risk. Furthermore, our analyses also show an increasing infection risk with increasing number of young children and increased relative risk of infection during early reopening in Denmark, where daycare facilities were among the first places to reopen, supporting that young children to some degree transmit SARS-CoV-2 in the household. Still, compared with older children, the transmission from young children within the household is relatively small (Figure 1). It is therefore imperative to weigh the benefits of young children attending daycare facilities and having playdates against the relatively small risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission.

Our findings are in line with findings from serological and epidemiological studies that suggest no sterilizing cross-reactive immunity of recent exposure to HCoVs(5,8). As opposed to previous studies, we were also able to investigate the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a population-setting, utilizing information on hospital admissions of all SARS-CoV-2 positive cases. We did not find statistical significant reduced risk of hospitalization among individuals living with young children compared with individuals living without. Nevertheless, the analyses had limited power due to the few hospitalizations of adults with young children, therefore, findings from other countries with similar data would be of value to explore a potential effect of HCoVs exposure on SARS-CoV-2 infection severity.

The newly emerging B.1.1.7 variant of SARS-CoV-2, was initially reported to be relatively more infectious in individuals below 20 years of age(22), but was very rare in Denmark during the study period and cannot explain our findings. However, given the surging spread of B.1.1.7, our study provides a framework for future population scale studies of transmission between children and their parents of this and other SARS-CoV-2 variants.

In summary, we found no evidence of a reduced risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in adults living with young children. On the contrary, we found a significant, slightly increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, which, however, was attenuated when taking account of older children in the same household. Our study thereby suggests no protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection from recent exposure to HCoVs.