Abstract
Background & Aims Recently, the validity of mass balance model (MBM) was questioned based on two feeding studies. Thus, we simulated both of these feeding trials.
Methods MBM describes the temporal evolution of body weight and body composition under a wide variety of feeding experiments. This computational study simulated, utilizing MBM, the underfeeding trial by Hall et al. (Cell Metab. 2015;22:427-36) and the overfeeding trial by Horton et al. (Am J Clin Nutr. 1995;62:19-29).
Results Our simulation results indicate that data from both of these feeding trials perfectly match MBM-based predictions, i.e., MBM gives a remarkably accurate description of experimental data.
Conclusions It is becoming increasingly clear that our model (MBM) is perfectly able to predict body weight and body composition fluctuations under a wide variety of feeding experiments.
“There is a stupid humility that is not at all rare, and those afflicted with it are altogether unfit to become devotees of knowledge. As soon as a person of this type perceives something striking, he turns on his heel, as it were, and says to himself: “You have made a mistake. What is the matter with your senses? This cannot, may not, be the truth.” And then, instead of looking and listening again, more carefully, he runs away from the striking thing, as if he had been intimidated, and tries to remove it from his mind as fast as he can. For his inner canon says: “I do not want to see anything that contradicts the prevalent opinion. Am I called to discover new truths? There are too many old ones, as it is…”
– Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science (1882)
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
This is a computational study.
Funding Statement
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
N/A
List of abbreviations
- MBM
- mass balance model
- EBT
- energy balance theory
- BW
- body weight
- FM
- fat mass
- FFM
- fat free mass
- EPM
- energy-providing mass
- nEPM
- non-energy-providing mass
- RC
- carbohydrate restricted diet
- RF
- fat restricted diet
- HC
- high-carbohydrate diet
- HF
- high-fat diet.
