Circulatory Cytokines and Chemokines Profile in Human Coronaviruses: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ayat Zawawi, Abdallah Y Naser, Hassan Alwafi, Faisal Minsahwi
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.16.21251673

Abstract

Background SARS, MERS, and COVID-19 share similar characteristics as the genetic homology of SARS-CoV-2 compared to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV is 80% and 50% respectively and cause similar clinical features. Uncontrolled release of proinflammatory mediators (cytokine storm) by activated immune cells in SARS, MERS, and COVID-19 leads to severe phenotype development.

Aim This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the inflammatory cytokines profile associated with severe human coronavirus diseases, including three stains: MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV SARS-CoV-2, in severe patients.

Method PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to July 2020. Randomized and Observational studies reporting the inflammatory cytokines associated with severe and non-severe human coronavirus diseases, including MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV SARS-CoV-2 were included. Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model with a 95% confidence interval (CI) to estimate the pooled mean of inflammatory biomarkers.

Results A high level of circulating IL-6 could be associated with the severity of the three strains of coronaviruses infection. TNF, IL-10, and IL-8 is associated with the severity of COVID-19. Increased circulating levels of CXCL10/IP10 and CCL2/MCP-1 might also be related to the severity of MERS.

Conclusion This study suggests that the immune response and immunopathology in the three severe human coronavirus strains are similar to some extent. These findings highlight that nearly all studies reporting severe cases of SARS, MERS, and COVID-19 have been associated with elevated levels of IL-6, which could be used as a potential therapeutic target to improve patients’ outcomes in severe cases.

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has been characterised as the third human coronavirus (hCoV) outbreak in only two decades (1). Coronaviruses are enveloped, single-stranded RNA viruses that infect the lower respiratory tract (2). Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) was the first global epidemic of the twenty-first century caused by SARS-CoV (3, 4). For the first time in Hong Kong, in March 2003, the disease broke out and has spread through the world, including Asia, Europe, and the United States (5). Nearly a decade following the SARS epidemic, the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) caused by MERS-CoV emerged in June 2012, in Saudi Arabia. The MERS outbreak also rapidly spread to more than 20 countries (6). Bats have been known to be the natural reservoir of SARS and MERS. Dromedary camels have also been found to be the zoonotic reservoir to transmit MERS to humans (7). COVID-19 is the newest emerging infectious disease (8). The infection began in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, (9). The novel coronavirus has infected over 100 million people with around 2 million death around the world (10), causing a more serious global threat than either of its two predecessors.

These three human coronaviruses share similar characteristics as the genetic homology of SARS-CoV-2 compared to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV is 80% and 50%, respectively (11). These three respiratory infectious diseases are also associated with significant morbidity and mortality as they are highly transmissible, primary through respiratory droplets and close contact (12). However, MERS is relatively inefficiently transmitted to humans compared to SARS and COVID-19 (13, 14). Conversely, SARS and COVID-19 were characterised by a relatively low mortality rate than MERS (15). This is likely related to the viral kinetic; older people are more common to get MERS infection and comorbid illness (15).

The three respiratory infectious diseases SARS, MERS, and COVID-19 cause similar clinical features ranged from asymptomatic to severe illness that requires intubation and intensive care management (16, 17). The severity of these diseases is linked to age and chronic illness, including diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory disease, and cancer (18). Whereas viral pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and multiple organ failure are common in these diseases’ later stages (19-21). Other non-specific laboratory tests including leukopenia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and elevated serum amino transaminases, are also common in SARS, MERS, and COVID-19 infections (22).

It has also been reported that uncontrolled release of proinflammatory mediators (cytokine storm) by activated immune cells in SARS (23), MERS (24) and COVID-19 (25) leads to the development of severe phenotype. Given the potential overlap in presentation and manifestation among severe hCoVs infection, as such absence of effective treatment, it is essential to understand the immunopathological aspect such as cytokine storm syndrome (CSS). Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the inflammatory biomarkers associated with severe human coronavirus diseases, including three significant stains: MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, which may indicate a distinct inflammatory profile and, accordingly, identifying potential treatment options in severe patients.

Methods

The systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out following the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines (26) and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement (27). The protocol of the study was registered with PROSPERO (Provisional registration number CRD42020209931).

Databases and search strategy

An extensive search strategy summarised in Figure 1 was developed to identify relevant studies. A detailed electronic search on bibliographic databases including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed from inception to July 2020. Keywords, Emtree and MeSH terms were used with both English and American spellings. The search strategy covered the following keywords: cytokines, inflammatory biomarkers, SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus, and COVID-19.

Figure 1.
Figure 1. The PRISMA flow diagram of study inclusion/exclusion process

Eligibility criteria

The selection of included studies was based on an inclusion/exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria includes any randomised or observational studies that assessed the concentration level of cytokines and chemokines in peripheral blood of patients with severe SARS, MERS and COVID-19. Severe patients or critical were defined as patients who had a respiratory failure, required mechanical ventilation, shock, combining other organ failures, and intensive care unit (ICU) were needed. Conference proceedings, reviews, studies not published in English, animal studies and in vitro cytokine production in stimulated cells were excluded. Studies that did not clearly differentiate between severity or did not report the mean and standard deviation or median of cytokine parameter levels were also excluded.

Data extraction

Initially, all the researchers (A.Z, A.N, H.A and F.M.) screened the title and abstract of each study independently to assess if it is eligible based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Subsequently, all the researchers (A.Z, A.N, H.A and F.M.) conducted a two-step full-text literature search independently to assess eligibility further. Data extraction from the relevant studies was performed independently by all researchers using a form created for this study. The following demographic details were extracted from each study; study details, data source, year of publication, sample size, age and sex. The mean, median, standard error, IQR, and range of the following cytokines and chemokines were also extracted; IL-1, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, TNF, INFg, RANTS, CCL2/MCP-1, CXCL10/IP10, and TGFß.

Quality assessment

Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale for Observational Studies (28), which was modified to meet the requirement of this study (29). A total of six criteria were evaluated: representativeness of the population, sample size, statistical analysis, missing data, methodology to report the outcome of interest and methods to detect or report the outcome of interest. Each criterion was rated using a scale ranging from 0 to 3, where 3 represented the highest quality. The highest possible overall score is 18. In addition, we categorised the quality assessment score into three categories: good quality (>12), moderate quality (>6) and low quality (≤6) points.

Data Synthesis and Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to describe the demographic characteristics and the quantitative mean concentration of the inflammatory biomarkers reported in each study. To standardise the data for meta-analysis, we estimated the mean cytokine concentrations from the studies that reported the median using the following formula: calculating the mean: if the sample size Embedded Image, if the sample size >25 (x = m), and calculating the variance: if the sample size Embedded Image, if the sample size 15-70 Embedded Image and if the sample size Embedded Image(30). A random-effect model was used to estimate the mean concentration of biomarkers (31). Heterogeneity among included studies in the meta-analysis was assessed using the standard χ2 tests and the I2 statistic. If high heterogeneity was indicated (I2 ≥ 75 %), a systematic narrative synthesis was provided. All analysis was performed using STATA 15.0.

*m = median, a = minimum, b = maximum, X = mean, S = variance, R = range (b-a)

Results

Studies selection, characteristics and quality assessment

A total of 4282 studies were identified through the initial online search in databases (Fig 1). Of these, 666 studies were duplicates. Title and abstract screening identified 34 studies for final full-text review using inclusion/exclusion criteria. Finally, the search yielded 18 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, fifteen studies were conducted on COVID-19, two studies on MERS, and one study on SARS. The fifteen COVID-19 studies included 538 severe patients with around (67%) male and (33%) females included in the final analysis. One SARS (47) and two MERS studies (48, 49) had smaller number of patients. The SARS study included 30 severe patients, 70% of them were male and 30 % were females. Moreover, the two MERS studies (48, 49) had 15 severe patients, with round 80% male and 20% females. The final 18 studies also included 1922 non-severe individuals as controls. 13 out of the 18 studies were conducted in China, 3 studies in South Korea, 1 study in Germany, and 1 study in Ireland. Most of the laboratory tests were conducted after admission. The characteristics of the included studies are summarised in Table 1. Overall, the quality of the included studies was good. The quality assessment score for the included studies ranged from 12 as the lowest score to 18 as the highest score recorded. Most of the studies (94.4%) included in this review were of good quality and scored >12 (n = 17), while one study was of moderate quality. The details of the quality assessments are presented in Table 1 and Supplementary table 1

View this table:
Table 1. Characteristics of included studies
View this table:
Table 2. Details on the pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines profile among all study participants.
View this table:
Table 3. Details on the chemokines profile among all study participants.

The level of circulating cytokines in COVID-19, MERS and SARS patients COVID-19

The dynamic changes of circulating cytokines (IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, TNF and IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-17) were analysed in the 18 included studies. IL-6 concentrations were reported in fifteen COVID-19 studies, one SARS study, and two MERS studies. Remarkably, all but one study showed a significant elevation on the level of IL-6 in severe COVID-19 patients compared to non-severe groups. The level of circulating IL-6 was also significantly high in severe SARS patients (517±769 pg/ml) compared to non-severe groups (163±796 pg/ml) (47). Furthermore, the two studies (48, 49) that measured the level of circulating cytokines in severe MERS patients showed an elevation on the level of IL-6 in severe MERS patients compared to non-severe groups.

Other cytokines were substantially elevated in patients with severe COVID-19 patients but not in patients with severe SARS and MERS. For example, three studies (32, 34, 38) out of eight showed a significant elevation on TNF level in severe COVID-19 patients compared to non-severe groups. The concentrations level of IL-10 was also measured in seven studies (33-35, 38, 41, 43, 46), of which ten studies reported a significant difference between severe COVID-19 patients compared to non-severe groups. In contrast, (47) and (48, 49) showed that the level of TNF and IL-10 cytokines were not significantly elevated in patients with severe SARS and MERS compared to a non-severe group, respectively.

Most of the other cytokines were not comparatively high in severe patients with COVID-19, SARS, and MERS. For example, one study (46) out of six showed that the level of IFN-γ was significantly high in patients with severe COVID-19 (1.9±0.3 pg/ml) compared to non-severe groups (1.2±0.1 pg/ml). IFN-γ concentrations were also not elevated in patients with severe SARS than the non-severe group (47). Similar results were seen on IL-4. One study (34) out of six showed that the level of IL-4 in severe COVID-19 patients was significantly higher (3.3±0.2 pg/ml) than non-severe groups (3.4±0.2 pg/ml). However, (47) reported that IL-4 concentration in patients with severe SARS was (110±12 pg/ml), similar to that for a non-severe group (109±13 pg/ml). The level of IFN-γ and IL-4 were not available in any MERS studies.

The concentrations of IL-1, IL-2, and IL-17 were only reported in four (32, 37, 39, 43) COVID-19 studies. Of these, one study (39) showed a significant difference between patients with severe COVID-19 (40.8±10.4 pg/ml) and non-severe groups (13.7±5.8 pg/ml). Similar results were seen in IL-2. One study (43) out of five reported a significant difference between severe COVID-19 patients with an average of 8.1±6.03 pg/ml, and non-severe groups, averaging 2.25±1.01 pg/ml. The only two studies (41, 43) that measured the level of IL-17 in severe COVID-19 patients also showed no significant difference between severe COVID-19 patients and non-severe groups. Altogether, our data suggest that a high level of circulating IL-6, TNF, and IL-10 might be associated with the severity of COVID-19. While increased IL-6 only might be related to the severity of SARS and MERS.

The level of circulating chemokines in COVID-19, MERS, and SARS patients

The concentrations of circulating inflammatory chemokine IL-8 were reported in five (32, 37-39, 43, 47) COVID-19 studies and one (47) SARS study. Remarkably, four (32, 37-39, 43) out of the five COVID-19 studies reported a significant elevation in the level of IL-8 in severe COVID-19 patients compared to non-severe groups. In contrast, the one study (47) conducted in SARS patients reported a significant reduction in the level of IL-8 in severe SARS patients with an average of 143±41 pg/ml compared to the non-severe group averaging 165±51 pg/ml.

The concentration level of C-X-C motif chemokine 10/interferon-gamma-induced protein 10 (CXCL10/IP10) and chemokine ligand 2/monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (CCL2/MCP-1) chemokines were only reported in two MERS studies (48, 49). The concentrations level of CXCL10/IP10 and CCL2/MCP-1 were significantly high in patients with severe MERS than in non-severe groups. Although the number of studies measuring the level of chemokines in patients with severe COVID-19, SARS and/or MERS is limited, the data suggest that circulating IL-8 chemokine might be associated with the severity of COVID-19. Moreover, the level of circulating CXCL10/IP10 and CCL2/MCP-1 chemokines might also be related to the severity of MERS.

The 18 studies included in the meta-analysis had a high-level of heterogeneity (I-squared = 99.9 %). There was considerable variation between studies in terms of geographical locations, study designs, time of blood collection, variable assays used to measure the level of cytokines and data source in both severe and non-severe cases (Supplementary figures 1)

Discussion

Emerging studies focused on selectively targeting elevating inflammatory cytokines for treating cytokine release syndrome in hCoVs (50). However, the mutual cytokine profile among hCoV stains, which could improve the hyperinflammatory state in critically ill hCoV patients is undetermined. In addition to unanswered questions about the mechanistic role of the cytokine storm shared between the three hCoVs. Therefore, this systemic review and meta-analysis were performed to analyse circulatory cytokines and chemokine profiles in patients with severe hCoVs.

Among the inflammatory parameters, our systematic review analysis demonstrated a marked elevation in the level of circulating IL-6 and TNF in severe COVID-19 and MERS patients in comparison to non-severe groups. Most of the included studies also showed a significant elevation of circulating IL-10 in severe COVID-19 patients compared to non-severe groups. However, due to the limited number of studies conducted on SARS, we could not find a strong association of high levels of circulatory IL-6 and TNF and IL-10 with the severity of the disease, which could be an essential factor for further investigation. A previous study on mice showed that SARS spike protein induced the secretion of high levels of IL-6 and TNF through the NF-kB pathway (51). Others indicated that MERS infected human monocyte derived-macrophages induced the secretion of high levels of TNF and IL-6 (52).

IL-6 and TNF are pleiotropic cytokines produced by different cell types during the acute phase of the infection (53, 54). Apart from its pleiotropic property, IL-6 deteriorates inflammation reaction and activates the coagulation pathway by inducing complement components and several acute-phase proteins including, C-reactive protein (CRP), antitrypsin, and fibrinogen (55). Previous studies have also indicated that the high level of circulatory IL-6 is considered an early marker of morbidity and mortality in lung diseases (56). A recent study by Zhua et al. reported the significant role of IL-6 as an independent COVID-19 risk factor using multivariate logistic regression analyses (46). Other studies suggested that the considerable elevation of IL-6 cytokine in severe COVID-19 patients is linked to the massive mucus production by stimulating the expression of the two predominant mucin genes (MUC5AC and MUC5B) in tracheobronchial epithelial cells (57, 58). IL-6 elevation might also be related to endothelial activation and precipitation of a pulmonary immune-mediated thrombosis (59). Moreover, IL-6 has been found to be significantly correlated with the anti-inflammatory cytokine, IL-10, which may reflect self-protection during cytokine release syndrome (46). It has also been reported that the level of anti-inflammatory cytokine could directly contribute to elaborate sepsis-induced immunosuppression, which amplifies the susceptibility to secondary infections (60). Consequently, the intense focus on treating severe COVID-19 cases with an anti-IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) is emerging and showed beneficial results in clinical trials (61).

Less is known about chemokines spectrum in human coronavirus compared to cytokine production. Thus, it is hard to determine the importance of chemokines in hCoVs disease progression. However, our systematic review showed similar or higher levels of chemokines detected in hCoVs infected patients. A marked overproduction of plasma IL-8 was demonstrated in patients infected with severe COVID-19. Whereas CXCL10/IP10 and CCL2/MCP-1 were detected in the blood of patients infected with severe MERS. However, other studies that were not included in our systematic review reported elevated levels of IL-8 in the blood of patients infected with MERS and SARS (52, 62, 63) and CXCL10/IP10 and CCL2/MCP-1 in SARS (64) and COVID-19 (65, 66) infected patients.

IL-8 and CCL2/MCP-1 are secreted by many cells in response to IL-6 and TNF mediated cytokines (67, 68). Whereas CXCL10/IP10 is secreted by many cells, including monocytes, endothelial cells and fibroblast in response to IFN-γ (69). These chemokines and others play essential roles in the pathogenesis of diseases characterized by thrombosis in addition to monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils and lymphocytes infiltration (70). Moreover, anti-CXCL10/IP10 is in a clinical trial as a promoing approach to treat cardiovascular event (71). Thus, the findings of high levels of chemokines in the serum of critically ill hCoVs patients provide some hints that chemokines could be used as biomarkers of the severity of hCoV diseases and can serve as targets for the development of hCoVs chemotherapeutics, especially in patients with thrombotic events.

Our demographic data also demonstrated that most of the hCoVs severe cases are among old male people, which is also in line with previous studies. It has been previously known that older people with comorbidity are more vulnerable than young people to develop a more advance and severe human coronavirus related disease (72). It is believed that dysregulated innate immunity and deficiency in adaptive immune response in older people, mostly males, could play an essential role in this observation (72). For instance, Torcia et al. demonstrated that peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from males stimulated with influenza and Herpes-simplex-1 viruses induced the production of high levels of IL-10 compared to females (73). Other studies showed that males had higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF) and chemokines (e.g., CXCL10) following lipopolysaccharide stimulation (74). In contrast, females had a higher number of proliferating T-cells and B-cells in vitro and antibody response to influenza vaccination than males (75). Previous studies also demonstrated that patients with comorbidities such as diabetes, asthma, and hypertension are at higher risk of mortality because of the excessive production of inflammatory cytokines, including IL-2R, IL-10, and TNF (76-78). These studies and others highlighted that gender, and age-specific innate and adaptive immunity and comorbidity might affect inflammation reaction of hCoVs patients, immunotherapy, and immune response to hCoVs vaccination.

Limitation of the study

Several limitations exist within our study; the most important is the observational nature of studies and significant heterogeneity in study results. However, high statistical heterogeneity is more frequent in meta-analyses of prevalence and descriptive studies (79). This can be explained because of the different patient populations, underlying comorbidities and coinfections, variant treatments and follow-up. The different time of blood collections, control donors, and cytokine detection assays can also explain the heterogenicity. Another significant limitation is the variability in laboratory assays used to measure the level of serum cytokines, as local laboratories have different normal ranges based on local data. This confounding variable can somewhat undermine our results and thus, our data should be interpreted as such, keeping in mind this important limitation.

The number of studies included on SARS and MERS compared to COVID-19 were low. However, this can be explained as the COVID-19 infection caused a major threat to the whole population compared to SARS and MERS.

Conclusions and future directions

Despite these limitations, our study in meta-analysis remained consistent with observational data analysis, demonstrating the importance of cytokine release syndrome and worsen the disease outcome in the three hCoV infectious diseases. Although not all the included studies demonstrated a significant elevation in the level of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-10 and TNF, in severe compared to non-severe groups. It is also worth considering that the less noticeable cytokine elevations in the three hCoV infections might suggest a regulated or insufficient inflammatory response to overwhelming viral infection such as IFN-γ.

Although the degree of cytokinaemia in patients with severe SARS, MERS, and COVID-19 is markedly higher than that seen in non-severe groups, there are still unanswered questions regarding the mechanistic role of cytokine storm shared in the three hCoVs. We believe that the immune response and immunopathology in COVID-19 are similar to some extent to SARS and MERS.These findings could shed light on the cytokine release syndrome in the progression of hCoVs and may indicate the type of immune response or pathophysiological events involved in these diseases with a potential therapeutic strategy to improve patients’ outcomes. We recommend using a combination of existing, approved therapies with proven safety profiles such as IL-6 blockade signaling (tocilizumab) for the treatment of hyperinflammation during the severe SARS, MERS, and COVID-19 infections

Data Availability

No furtehr data is available

Data Availability

All data sets generated for this study are included in the manuscript/supplementary files.

Author Contribution

Conception and design FM; Acquisition of the data: AZ, AYN, HA, and FM; Analysis and interpretation of the data: AZ, AYN, HA, and FM. Drafting and revising the article: AZ, AYN, HA, and FM. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors

Supplementary materials

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at:

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

Reference

  1. 1.↵
    Guarner J. Three emerging coronaviruses in two decades: the story of SARS, MERS, and now COVID-19: Oxford University Press US; 2020 [
  2. 2.↵
    Egloff M-P, Ferron F, Campanacci V, Longhi S, Rancurel C, Dutartre H, et al. The severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus replicative protein nsp9 is a single-stranded RNA-binding subunit unique in the RNA virus world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2004;101(11):3792–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Cherry JD, Krogstad P. SARS: the first pandemic of the 21st century. Pediatr Res. 2004;56(1):1–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Ksiazek TG, Erdman D, Goldsmith CS, Zaki SR, Peret T, Emery S, et al. A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(20):1953–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Skowronski DM, Astell C, Brunham RC, Low DE, Petric M, Roper RL, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): a year in review. Annu Rev Med. 2005;56:357–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Raj VS, Osterhaus AD, Fouchier RA, Haagmans BL. MERS: emergence of a novel human coronavirus. Curr Opin Virol. 2014;5:58–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Nowotny N, Kolodziejek J. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in dromedary camels, Oman, 2013. Euro Surveill. 2014;19(16):20781.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Spinelli A, Pellino G. COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives on an unfolding crisis. Br J Surg. 2020;107(7):785–7.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    Cucinotta D, Vanelli M. WHO Declares COVID-19 a Pandemic. Acta Biomed. 2020;91(1):157–60.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Organization WH. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) Weekly Epidemiological Update and Weekly Operational Update 2020 [
  11. 11.↵
    Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. The Lancet. 2020;395(10224):565–74.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    Cunha CB, Opal SM. Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS): a new zoonotic viral pneumonia. Virulence. 2014;5(6):650–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Zumla AI, Memish ZA. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: epidemic potential or a storm in a teacup? Eur Respir J. 2014;43(5):1243–8.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Chen J. Pathogenicity and transmissibility of 2019-nCoV-A quick overview and comparison with other emerging viruses. Microbes Infect. 2020;22(2):69–71.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Hui DS, Memish ZA, Zumla A. Severe acute respiratory syndrome vs. the Middle East respiratory syndrome. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2014;20(3):233–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Zhu Z, Lian X, Su X, Wu W, Marraro GA, Zeng Y. From SARS and MERS to COVID-19: a brief summary and comparison of severe acute respiratory infections caused by three highly pathogenic human coronaviruses. Respiratory research. 2020;21(1):1–14.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    Channappanavar R, Perlman S. Pathogenic human coronavirus infections: causes and consequences of cytokine storm and immunopathology. Seminars In Immunopathology. 2017;39(5):529–39.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    Lei S, Jiang F, Su W, Chen C, Chen J, Mei W, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing surgeries during the incubation period of COVID-19 infection. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;21:100331.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497–506.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.
    Guery B, Poissy J, el Mansouf L, Sejourne C, Ettahar N, Lemaire X, et al. Clinical features and viral diagnosis of two cases of infection with Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus: a report of nosocomial transmission. Lancet. 2013;381(9885):2265–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    Booth CM, Matukas LM, Tomlinson GA, Rachlis AR, Rose DB, Dwosh HA, et al. Clinical features and short-term outcomes of 144 patients with SARS in the greater Toronto area. JAMA. 2003;289(21):2801–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Petrosillo N, Viceconte G, Ergonul O, Ippolito G, Petersen E. COVID-19, SARS and MERS: are they closely related? Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2020.
  23. 23.↵
    Cameron MJ, Bermejo-Martin JF, Danesh A, Muller MP, Kelvin DJ. Human immunopathogenesis of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Virus Res. 2008;133(1):13–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    Lau SKP, Lau CCY, Chan KH, Li CPY, Chen H, Jin DY, et al. Delayed induction of proinflammatory cytokines and suppression of innate antiviral response by the novel Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: implications for pathogenesis and treatment. J Gen Virol. 2013;94(Pt 12):2679–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    Mangalmurti N, Hunter CA. Cytokine Storms: Understanding COVID-19. Immunity. 2020;53(1):19–25.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Jama. 2000;283(15):2008–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    Picot J, Hartwell D, Harris P, Mendes D, Clegg A, Takeda A. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses checklist. The Effectiveness of Interventions to Treat Severe Acute Malnutrition in Young Children: A Systematic Review: NIHR Journals Library; 2012.
  28. 28.↵
    Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell Da, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Oxford; 2000.
  29. 29.↵
    Park JY, Howren AM, Zusman EZ, Esdaile JM, De Vera MA. The incidence of depression and anxiety in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC rheumatology. 2020;4(1):1–8.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC medical research methodology. 2005;5(1):13.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    Deeks JJ, Higgins JP, Altman DG, Group CSM. Analysing data and undertaking metaLanalyses. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2019:241–84.
  32. 32.↵
    Chen G, Wu D, Guo W, Cao Y, Huang D, Wang H, et al. Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2020;130(5):2620–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    Gao Y, Li T, Han M, Li X, Wu D, Xu Y, et al. Diagnostic utility of clinical laboratory data determinations for patients with the severe COVID-19. Journal of Medical Virology. 2020;92(7):791–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    Han H, Ma Q, Li C, Liu R, Zhao L, Wang W, et al. Profiling serum cytokines in COVID-19 patients reveals IL-6 and IL-10 are disease severity predictors. Emerging Microbes & Infections. 2020;9(1):1123–30.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    He S, Zhou C, Lu D, Yang H, Xu H, Wu G, et al. Relationship between Chest CT manifestations and immune response in COVID-19 patients. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2020;20:20.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.
    Herold T, Jurinovic V, Arnreich C, Lipworth BJ, Hellmuth JC, Bergwelt-Baildon MV, et al. Elevated levels of IL-6 and CRP predict the need for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2020.
  37. 37.↵
    Liu Y, Liao W, Wan L, Xiang T, Zhang W. Correlation Between Relative Nasopharyngeal Virus RNA Load and Lymphocyte Count Disease Severity in Patients with COVID-19. Viral immunology. 2020;10.
  38. 38.↵
    Luo M, Liu J, Jiang W, Yue S, Liu H, Wei S. IL-6 and CD8+ T cell counts combined are an early predictor of in-hospital mortality of patients with COVID-19. Jci Insight. 2020;5(13):09.
    OpenUrl
  39. 39.↵
    McElvaney OJ, McEvoy N, McElvaney OF, Carroll TP, Murphy MP, Dunlea DM, et al. Characterization of the Inflammatory Response to Severe COVID-19 Illness. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2020;25.
  40. 40.
    Chen R, Sang L, Jiang M, Yang Z, Jia N, Fu W, et al. Longitudinal hematologic and immunologic variations associated with the progression of COVID-19 patients in China. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2020.
  41. 41.↵
    Wan S, Yi Q, Fan S, Lv J, Zhang X, Guo L, et al. Relationships among lymphocyte subsets, cytokines, and the pulmonary inflammation index in coronavirus (COVID-19) infected patients. British Journal of Haematology. 2020;189(3):428–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. 42.
    Chen X, Zhao B, Qu Y, Chen Y, Xiong J, Feng Y, et al. Detectable serum SARS-CoV-2 viral load (RNAaemia) is closely correlated with drastically elevated interleukin 6 (IL-6) level in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2020;17.
  43. 43.↵
    Yang AP, Li HM, Tao WQ, Yang XJ, Wang M, Yang WJ, et al. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 causes abnormal laboratory results of multiple organs in patients. Aging. 2020;12(11):10059–69.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. 44.
    Yuan X, Huang W, Ye B, Chen C, Huang R, Wu F, et al. Changes of hematological and immunological parameters in COVID-19 patients. International Journal of Hematology. 2020.
  45. 45.
    Zhou Y, Han T, Chen J, Hou C, Hua L, He S, et al. Clinical and Autoimmune Characteristics of Severe and Critical Cases with COVID-19. Clinical and Translational Science. 2020.
  46. 46.↵
    Zhu Z, Cai T, Fan L, Lou K, Hua X, Huang Z, et al. Clinical value of immune-inflammatory parameters to assess the severity of coronavirus disease 2019. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2020.
  47. 47.↵
    Zhang Y, Li J, Zhan Y, Wu L, Yu X, Zhang W, et al. Analysis of serum cytokines in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Infection and immunity. 2004;72(8):4410–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    Hong KH, Choi JP, Hong SH, Lee J, Kwon JS, Kim SM, et al. Predictors of mortality in Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS). Thorax. 2018;73(3):286–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    Kim ES, Choe PG, Park WB, Oh HS, Kim EJ, Nam EY, et al. Clinical Progression and Cytokine Profiles of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infection. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2016;31(11):1717–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    Liu B, Li M, Zhou Z, Guan X, Xiang Y. Can we use interleukin-6 (IL-6) blockade for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-induced cytokine release syndrome (CRS)? Journal of Autoimmunity. 2020;111:102452.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    Wang W, Ye L, Ye L, Li B, Gao B, Zeng Y, et al. Up-regulation of IL-6 and TNF-alpha induced by SARS-coronavirus spike protein in murine macrophages via NF-kappaB pathway. Virus Res. 2007;128(1-2):1–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    Zhou J, Chu H, Li C, Wong BH-Y, Cheng Z-S, Poon VK-M, et al. Active replication of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus and aberrant induction of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in human macrophages: implications for pathogenesis. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2014;209(9):1331–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    Gadient RA, Patterson PH. Leukemia inhibitory factor, Interleukin 6, and other cytokines using the GP130 transducing receptor: roles in inflammation and injury. Stem cells. 1999;17(3):127–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 54.↵
    Kalliolias GD, Ivashkiv LB. TNF biology, pathogenic mechanisms and emerging therapeutic strategies. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016;12(1):49–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    Tanaka T, Narazaki M, Kishimoto T. Immunotherapeutic implications of IL-6 blockade for cytokine storm. Immunotherapy. 2016;8(8):959–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    Parsons PE, Eisner MD, Thompson BT, Matthay MA, Ancukiewicz M, Bernard GR, et al. Lower tidal volume ventilation and plasma cytokine markers of inflammation in patients with acute lung injury. Critical care medicine. 2005;33(1):1–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. 57.↵
    Wang C, Xie J, Zhao L, Fei X, Zhang H, Tan Y, et al. Aveolar macrophage activation and cytokine storm in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19. 2020.
  58. 58.↵
    Chen Y, Thai P, Zhao Y-H, Ho Y-S, DeSouza MM, Wu R. Stimulation of airway mucin gene expression by interleukin (IL)-17 through IL-6 paracrine/autocrine loop. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2003;278(19):17036–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. 59.↵
    McGonagle D, O’Donnell JS, Sharif K, Emery P, Bridgewood C. Immune mechanisms of pulmonary intravascular coagulopathy in COVID-19 pneumonia. The Lancet Rheumatology. 2020.
  60. 60.↵
    Hotchkiss RS, Monneret G, Payen D. Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: from cellular dysfunctions to immunotherapy. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2013;13(12):862–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. 61.↵
    1. Hospital BU
    Corazza F. Evaluation of Interleukine 6 (and Other Cytokines and Inflammatory Markers) in COVID-19 Patients With a Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome. In: Hospital BU, editor. April: ClinicalTrials.gov 2020.
  62. 62.↵
    Alosaimi B, Hamed ME, Naeem A, Alsharef AA, AlQahtani SY, AlDosari KM, et al. MERS-CoV infection is associated with downregulation of genes encoding Th1 and Th2 cytokines/chemokines and elevated inflammatory innate immune response in the lower respiratory tract. Cytokine. 2020;126:154895.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  63. 63.↵
    Yoshikawa T, Hill T, Li K, Peters CJ, Tseng CT. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus-induced lung epithelial cytokines exacerbate SARS pathogenesis by modulating intrinsic functions of monocyte-derived macrophages and dendritic cells. J Virol. 2009;83(7):3039–48.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. 64.↵
    Cheung CY, Poon LL, Ng IH, Luk W, Sia S-F, Wu MH, et al. Cytokine responses in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-infected macrophages in vitro: possible relevance to pathogenesis. Journal of virology. 2005;79(12):7819–26.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. 65.↵
    Zhang F, Mears JR, Shakib L, Beynor JI, Shanaj S, Korsunsky I, et al. IFN-γ and TNF-α drive a CXCL10+ CCL2+ macrophage phenotype expanded in severe COVID-19 and other diseases with tissue inflammation. bioRxiv. 2020.
  66. 66.↵
    Tincati C, Cannizzo ES, Giacomelli M, Badolato R, Monforte AdA, Marchetti G. Heightened Circulating Interferon-Inducible Chemokines, and Activated Pro-Cytolytic Th1-Cell Phenotype Features Covid-19 Aggravation in the Second Week of Illness. Frontiers in immunology. 2020;11.
  67. 67.↵
    Rollins BJ, Yoshimura T, Leonard EJ, Pober JS. Cytokine-activated human endothelial cells synthesize and secrete a monocyte chemoattractant, MCP-1/JE. Am J Pathol. 1990;136(6):1229–33.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  68. 68.↵
    Romano M, Sironi M, Toniatti C, Polentarutti N, Fruscella P, Ghezzi P, et al. Role of IL-6 and its soluble receptor in induction of chemokines and leukocyte recruitment. Immunity. 1997;6(3):315–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  69. 69.↵
    van den Borne P, Quax PH, Hoefer IE, Pasterkamp G. The multifaceted functions of CXCL10 in cardiovascular disease. BioMed research international. 2014;2014.
  70. 70.↵
    Xu Z-S, Shu T, Kang L, Wu D, Zhou X, Liao B-W, et al. Temporal profiling of plasma cytokines, chemokines and growth factors from mild, severe and fatal COVID-19 patients. Signal transduction and targeted therapy. 2020;5(1):1–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  71. 71.↵
    Lupieri A, Smirnova NF, Solinhac R, Malet N, Benamar M, Saoudi A, et al. Smooth muscle cells-derived CXCL10 prevents endothelial healing through PI3Kγ-dependent T cells response. Cardiovascular Research. 2020;116(2):438–49.
    OpenUrl
  72. 72.↵
    Qin L, Li X, Shi J, Yu M, Wang K, Tao Y, et al. Gendered effects on inflammation reaction and outcome of COVIDL19 patients in Wuhan. Journal of Medical Virology. 2020.
  73. 73.↵
    Torcia MG, Nencioni L, Clemente AM, Civitelli L, Celestino I, Limongi D, et al. Sex differences in the response to viral infections: TLR8 and TLR9 ligand stimulation induce higher IL10 production in males. PloS one. 2012;7(6):e39853.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. 74.↵
    Sankaran-Walters S, Macal M, Grishina I, Nagy L, Goulart L, Coolidge K, et al. Sex differences matter in the gut: effect on mucosal immune activation and inflammation. Biology of sex differences. 2013;4(1):1–12.
    OpenUrl
  75. 75.↵
    Abdullah M, Chai P-S, Chong M-Y, Tohit ERM, Ramasamy R, Pei CP, et al. Gender effect on in vitro lymphocyte subset levels of healthy individuals. Cellular immunology. 2012;272(2):214–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. 76.↵
    Huang H, Luo Y, Liang Y, Long X, Peng Y, Liu Z, et al. CD4+ CD25+ T cells in primary malignant hypertension related kidney injury. Scientific Reports. 2016;6(1):1–9.
    OpenUrl
  77. 77.
    Rucker AJ, Crowley SD. The role of macrophages in hypertension and its complications. Pflügers Archiv-European Journal of Physiology. 2017;469(3-4):419–30.
    OpenUrl
  78. 78.↵
    Silawal S, Willauschus M, Schulze-Tanzil G, Gögele C, Geßlein M, Schwarz S. Il-10 could play a role in the interrelation between diabetes mellitus and osteoarthritis. International journal of molecular sciences. 2019;20(3):768.
    OpenUrl
  79. 79.↵
    Alba AC, Alexander PE, Chang J, MacIsaac J, DeFry S, Guyatt GH. High statistical heterogeneity is more frequent in meta-analysis of continuous than binary outcomes. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2016;70:129–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Back to top
Posted February 19, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email
Circulatory Cytokines and Chemokines Profile in Human Coronaviruses: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Ayat Zawawi, Abdallah Y Naser, Hassan Alwafi, Faisal Minsahwi
medRxiv 2021.02.16.21251673; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.16.21251673
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area