Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial findings of a UK primary care survey

View ORCID ProfileSarah Mitchell, Phillip Oliver, Clare Gardiner, Helen Chapman, Dena Khan, Kirsty Boyd, Jeremy Dale, Stephen Barclay, Catriona Mayland
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.15.21251756
Sarah Mitchell
1GP and Yorkshire Cancer Research Senior Research Fellow, University of Sheffield
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sarah Mitchell
  • For correspondence: s.j.mitchell@sheffield.ac.uk
Phillip Oliver
2GP and Clinical Lecturer, University of Sheffield
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clare Gardiner
3Senior Research Fellow, University of Sheffield
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helen Chapman
4Queens Nurse and Head of Integrated Community Care at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dena Khan
5Patient and Public Involvement representative
Roles: co-author
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kirsty Boyd
6Reader in Palliative Care, University of Edinburgh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeremy Dale
7Professor of Primary Care, University of Warwick
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen Barclay
8Senior Lecturer in General Practice and Palliative Care, University of Cambridge / Honorary Professor in Palliative and Primary Care at the University of East Anglia Norwich Medical School
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catriona Mayland
9Yorkshire Cancer Research Senior Clinical Research Fellow and Honorary Consultant in Palliative Medicine, University of Sheffield
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Thousands of people in the UK have required end-of-life care in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic. Primary healthcare teams (general practice and community nursing services) have provided the majority of this care, alongside specialist colleagues. There is a need to learn from this experience in order to inform future service delivery and planning.

Aim To understand the views of general practitioners and community nurses providing end-of-life care during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Design and Setting A web-based, UK-wide questionnaire survey circulated via professional general practice and community nursing networks during September and October 2020.

Method Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and an inductive thematic analysis.

Results Valid responses were received from 559 individuals (387 community nurses, 156 General Practitioners (GPs) and 16 unspecified role), from all regions of the UK. The majority reported increased involvement in providing community end-of-life care. Contrasting and potentially conflicting roles emerged between GPs and community nurses. There was increased use of remote consultations, particularly by GPs. Community nurses took greater responsibility in most aspects of end-of-life care practice, particularly face-to-face care, but reported feeling isolated. For some GPs and community nurses, there has been considerable emotional distress.

Conclusion Primary healthcare services are playing a critical role in meeting increased need for end-of-life care in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic. They have adapted rapidly, but the significant emotional impact, especially for community nurses, needs addressing alongside rebuilding trusting and supportive team dynamics.

How this fits in (4 sentences)

  • This study provides insights into experiences of delivering end-of-life care in the community during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspectives of UK general practitioners (GPs) and community nurses.

  • Services have changed and adapted rapidly to meet increased need in terms of both volume and complexity, with community nurses taking greater responsibility for most areas of palliative care clinical practice, and GPs undertaking more care planning conversations.

  • While GPs and specialist palliative care services conducted more remote consultations, community nurses carried out face-to-face end-of-life care and reported a feeling of isolation.

  • As the pandemic progresses, and the increased need for end-of-life care in the community persists, more effective service models and multi-disciplinary teamwork in primary care are urgently needed.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship and / or publication of this article. Dr Sarah Mitchell and Dr Catriona Mayland are funded by Yorkshire Cancer Research Connects Senior Research Fellowships.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethical approval was granted by the University of Sheffield Research Ethics Committee (UREC) Ref No: 035508. Approved 28.7.20

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 16, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial findings of a UK primary care survey
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial findings of a UK primary care survey
Sarah Mitchell, Phillip Oliver, Clare Gardiner, Helen Chapman, Dena Khan, Kirsty Boyd, Jeremy Dale, Stephen Barclay, Catriona Mayland
medRxiv 2021.02.15.21251756; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.15.21251756
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial findings of a UK primary care survey
Sarah Mitchell, Phillip Oliver, Clare Gardiner, Helen Chapman, Dena Khan, Kirsty Boyd, Jeremy Dale, Stephen Barclay, Catriona Mayland
medRxiv 2021.02.15.21251756; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.15.21251756

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Palliative Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (70)
  • Allergy and Immunology (168)
  • Anesthesia (49)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (448)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (80)
  • Dermatology (55)
  • Emergency Medicine (157)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (190)
  • Epidemiology (5214)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (194)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (749)
  • Geriatric Medicine (76)
  • Health Economics (212)
  • Health Informatics (694)
  • Health Policy (352)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (222)
  • Hematology (98)
  • HIV/AIDS (162)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5814)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (356)
  • Medical Education (102)
  • Medical Ethics (25)
  • Nephrology (80)
  • Neurology (758)
  • Nursing (43)
  • Nutrition (129)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (141)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (231)
  • Oncology (475)
  • Ophthalmology (149)
  • Orthopedics (38)
  • Otolaryngology (93)
  • Pain Medicine (39)
  • Palliative Medicine (19)
  • Pathology (139)
  • Pediatrics (223)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (136)
  • Primary Care Research (96)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (853)
  • Public and Global Health (1992)
  • Radiology and Imaging (343)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (156)
  • Respiratory Medicine (283)
  • Rheumatology (93)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (72)
  • Sports Medicine (75)
  • Surgery (108)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (39)