Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Systematic Review and Scientific Rating of Commercial Apps Available in India for Diabetes Prevention

View ORCID ProfileH Ranjani, S Nitika, R Hariharan, H Charumeena, N Oliver, R Pradeepa, J C Chambers, R Unnikrishnan, V Mohan, P Avari, RM Anjana
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.15.21251723
H Ranjani
1Dr. Mohan’s Diabetes Specialities Centre and Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for H Ranjani
  • For correspondence: drranjanih@gmail.com
S Nitika
1Dr. Mohan’s Diabetes Specialities Centre and Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R Hariharan
1Dr. Mohan’s Diabetes Specialities Centre and Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H Charumeena
1Dr. Mohan’s Diabetes Specialities Centre and Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N Oliver
2Department of Metabolism, Diabetes and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R Pradeepa
1Dr. Mohan’s Diabetes Specialities Centre and Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J C Chambers
3Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, UK
4Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 308232, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R Unnikrishnan
1Dr. Mohan’s Diabetes Specialities Centre and Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
V Mohan
1Dr. Mohan’s Diabetes Specialities Centre and Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P Avari
2Department of Metabolism, Diabetes and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RM Anjana
1Dr. Mohan’s Diabetes Specialities Centre and Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND Scientific evidence for digital health applications (apps) which claim to help in the prevention and management of Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is limited.

OBJECTIVES We aimed to evaluate the quality of currently available health apps for prevention of T2D amongst Asian Indians.

METHODS Using the keywords, ‘diabetes prevention’, ‘healthy lifestyle’ and ‘fitness’, a total of 1486 apps available in India via Google Play were assessed for eligibility by two independent reviewers. After initial screening using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, 50 apps underwent a pre-specified rating based on user reviews, number of downloads and app size. Sixteen apps that scored ≥ 9 were shortlisted for further review using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). MARS contains 2 main categories: Category I (Application Quality) and Category II (Application Subjective Quality). The mean MARS scores were used to identify the top ranked apps.

RESULTS The mean score for Category I of MARS rating was highest for ‘Google Fit: Health and Activity Tracking’ (4.55/5). This was followed by ‘Healthifyme - Diet Plan, Health and Weight Loss’ (4.45/5). For Category II of MARS, ‘Diabetes M’, ‘Google Fit: Health and Activity Tracking’ and Calorie Counter- My fitness pal’, ‘Healthifyme - Diet plan, Health and Weight Loss’ all scored equally well. On comparing the advantages and disadvantages of each of these applications, ‘Google Fit: Health and Activity Tracking’ and ‘Healthifyme - Diet plan, Health and Weight Loss’ again ranked the best.

CONCLUSIONS Our review identifies two commercially available apps ‘Google Fit: Health and Activity Tracking’ and ‘Healthifyme - Diet plan, Health and Weight Loss’ as being user friendly and good quality. Although encouraging, further research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of these apps for prevention of diabetes.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

The project has been registered with Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI) - CTRI/2020/03/024327

Funding Statement

Funding: The research was supported by the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Official Development Assistance (ODA, award 16/136/68). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR. Acknowledgments: At Imperial College London, the infrastructure support was provided by the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre and the NIHR Imperial Clinical Research Facility. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Disclosures: N.O has received honoraria for speaking and advisory board participation from Abbott Diabetes, Dexcom, Medtronic Diabetes, and Roche Diabetes. V.M has received research or educational grants or honoraria for speaking engagements or serving on advisory boards from Novo Nordisk, Servier, MSD, Novartis, Eli Lilly, M/s. USV, Lifescan J & J, Sanofi Aventis, Merck, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbott and from several Indian pharmaceutical companies.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Madras Diabetes Research Foundation - Institutional Ethics Committee. IRB Nos.IRB00002640

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • * The abstract of this manuscript has been presented as part of a poster discussion at the Advanced Technologies and Treatment for Diabetes (ATTD), 2020, which was held from 19th – 22nd February 2020 in Madrid, Spain.

Data Availability

I take full responsibility for this data.

  • Abbreviations

    AI
    artificial intelligence
    Apps
    applications
    CVD
    cardiovascular disease
    MARS
    Mobile App Rating Scale
    mHealth
    mobile health
    T2D
    type 2 diabetes
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted February 18, 2021.
    Download PDF
    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Systematic Review and Scientific Rating of Commercial Apps Available in India for Diabetes Prevention
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Systematic Review and Scientific Rating of Commercial Apps Available in India for Diabetes Prevention
    H Ranjani, S Nitika, R Hariharan, H Charumeena, N Oliver, R Pradeepa, J C Chambers, R Unnikrishnan, V Mohan, P Avari, RM Anjana
    medRxiv 2021.02.15.21251723; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.15.21251723
    Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Systematic Review and Scientific Rating of Commercial Apps Available in India for Diabetes Prevention
    H Ranjani, S Nitika, R Hariharan, H Charumeena, N Oliver, R Pradeepa, J C Chambers, R Unnikrishnan, V Mohan, P Avari, RM Anjana
    medRxiv 2021.02.15.21251723; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.15.21251723

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease)
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (70)
    • Allergy and Immunology (168)
    • Anesthesia (51)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (453)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (83)
    • Dermatology (55)
    • Emergency Medicine (158)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (191)
    • Epidemiology (5270)
    • Forensic Medicine (3)
    • Gastroenterology (196)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (759)
    • Geriatric Medicine (80)
    • Health Economics (213)
    • Health Informatics (700)
    • Health Policy (360)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (224)
    • Hematology (99)
    • HIV/AIDS (164)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5889)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (363)
    • Medical Education (105)
    • Medical Ethics (25)
    • Nephrology (83)
    • Neurology (767)
    • Nursing (43)
    • Nutrition (131)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (143)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (234)
    • Oncology (480)
    • Ophthalmology (152)
    • Orthopedics (39)
    • Otolaryngology (95)
    • Pain Medicine (39)
    • Palliative Medicine (20)
    • Pathology (141)
    • Pediatrics (223)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (136)
    • Primary Care Research (98)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (864)
    • Public and Global Health (2023)
    • Radiology and Imaging (349)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (158)
    • Respiratory Medicine (287)
    • Rheumatology (94)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (74)
    • Sports Medicine (77)
    • Surgery (110)
    • Toxicology (25)
    • Transplantation (29)
    • Urology (39)