Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Using DNA to predict behaviour problems from preschool to adulthood

Agnieszka Gidziela, Kaili Rimfeld, View ORCID ProfileMargherita Malanchini, Andrea G. Allegrini, Andrew McMillan, Saskia Selzam, Angelica Ronald, Essi Viding, Sophie von Stumm, Thalia C. Eley, Robert Plomin
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.15.21251308
Agnieszka Gidziela
1Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London
2School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: a.bubel@qmul.ac.uk
Kaili Rimfeld
1Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margherita Malanchini
1Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London
2School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Margherita Malanchini
Andrea G. Allegrini
1Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London
3Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew McMillan
1Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Saskia Selzam
1Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angelica Ronald
4Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck University of London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Essi Viding
3Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sophie von Stumm
5Department of Education, University of York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thalia C. Eley
1Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Plomin
1Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background One goal of the DNA revolution is to predict problems in order to prevent them. We tested here if the prediction of behaviour problems from genome-wide polygenic scores (GPS) can be improved by creating composites across ages and across raters and by using a multi-GPS approach that includes GPS for adult psychiatric disorders as well as for childhood behaviour problems.

Method Our sample included 3,065 genotyped unrelated individuals from the Twins Early Development Study who were assessed longitudinally for hyperactivity, conduct, emotional problems and peer problems as rated by parents, teachers and children themselves. GPS created from 15 genome-wide association studies were used separately and jointly to test the prediction of behaviour problems composites (general behaviour problems, externalizing and internalizing) across ages (from age 2 to age 21) and across raters in penalized regression models. Based on the regression weights, we created multi-trait GPS reflecting the best prediction of behaviour problems. We compared GPS prediction to twin heritability using the same sample and measures.

Results Multi-GPS prediction of behaviour problems increased from less than 2% of the variance for observed traits to up to 6% for cross-age and cross-rater composites. Twin study estimates of heritability mirrored patterns of multi-GPS prediction as they increased from less than 40% to up to 83%.

Conclusions The ability of GPS to predict behaviour problems can be improved by using multiple GPS, cross-age composites and cross-rater composites, although the effect sizes remain modest, up to 6%. Our results can be used in any genotyped sample to create multi-trait GPS predictors of behaviour problems that will be more predictive than polygenic scores based on a single age, rater or GPS.

Key points

  • Genome-wide polygenic scores (GPS) can be used to predict behaviour problems in childhood, but the effect sizes are generally less than 3.5%.

  • DNA-based prediction models of achieve greater accuracy if holistic approaches are employed, that is cross-trait, longitudinal and trans-situational approaches.

  • The prediction of childhood behaviour problems can be improved by using multiple GPS to predict composites that aggregate behaviour problems across ages and across raters.

  • Our results yield weights that can be applied to GPS in any study to create multi-trait GPS predictors of behaviour problems based on cross-age and cross-rater composites.

  • As compared to individuals in the lowest multi-trait GPS decile, nearly three times as many individuals in the highest internalizing multi-trait GPS decile were diagnosed with anxiety disorder and 25% more individuals in the highest general behaviour problems and externalizing multi-trait GPS deciles have taken medication for mental health.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

We gratefully acknowledge the on-going contribution of the participants in the Twins Early Development Study (TEDS) and their families. TEDS is supported by a programme grant to R.P. from the UK Medical Research Council (MR/M021475/1 and previously G0901245), with additional support from the US National Institutes of Health (AG046938) and the European Commission (602768; 295366).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

TEDS was approved by the Kings College London Research Ethics Committee (PNM/09/10-104).

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Scripts are available on the OSF site.

https://osf.io/27tpj/

  • Abbreviations

    GPS
    genome-wide polygenic scores
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted February 19, 2021.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Using DNA to predict behaviour problems from preschool to adulthood
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Using DNA to predict behaviour problems from preschool to adulthood
    Agnieszka Gidziela, Kaili Rimfeld, Margherita Malanchini, Andrea G. Allegrini, Andrew McMillan, Saskia Selzam, Angelica Ronald, Essi Viding, Sophie von Stumm, Thalia C. Eley, Robert Plomin
    medRxiv 2021.02.15.21251308; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.15.21251308
    Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Using DNA to predict behaviour problems from preschool to adulthood
    Agnieszka Gidziela, Kaili Rimfeld, Margherita Malanchini, Andrea G. Allegrini, Andrew McMillan, Saskia Selzam, Angelica Ronald, Essi Viding, Sophie von Stumm, Thalia C. Eley, Robert Plomin
    medRxiv 2021.02.15.21251308; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.15.21251308

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (70)
    • Allergy and Immunology (168)
    • Anesthesia (49)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (448)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (80)
    • Dermatology (55)
    • Emergency Medicine (157)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (190)
    • Epidemiology (5214)
    • Forensic Medicine (3)
    • Gastroenterology (194)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (749)
    • Geriatric Medicine (76)
    • Health Economics (212)
    • Health Informatics (694)
    • Health Policy (352)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (222)
    • Hematology (98)
    • HIV/AIDS (162)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5814)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (356)
    • Medical Education (102)
    • Medical Ethics (25)
    • Nephrology (80)
    • Neurology (758)
    • Nursing (43)
    • Nutrition (129)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (141)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (231)
    • Oncology (475)
    • Ophthalmology (149)
    • Orthopedics (38)
    • Otolaryngology (93)
    • Pain Medicine (39)
    • Palliative Medicine (19)
    • Pathology (139)
    • Pediatrics (223)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (136)
    • Primary Care Research (96)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (853)
    • Public and Global Health (1992)
    • Radiology and Imaging (343)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (156)
    • Respiratory Medicine (283)
    • Rheumatology (93)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (72)
    • Sports Medicine (75)
    • Surgery (108)
    • Toxicology (25)
    • Transplantation (29)
    • Urology (39)