ABSTRACT
Background and aim The awareness and practice of diabetes foot prevention by internist through routine examination and patient education remains less than optimal. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of care of internist in performing foot care in high-risk patients.
Methods A cross sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Jakarta, Indonesia. Type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects with high-risk foot complication were included in this study. Each subject filled-in a questionnaire investigating whether they had received information about proper foot care practice and whether they have ever had their feet examined by an internist at their present consultation. Multivariate logistic regression were performed.
Results 368 patients were recruited, 130 of them (35.3%) treated by endocrinologists. 71.20% patients did not received any information on foot care and 54.08% patients did not received any foot examination. Foot care information was 1.6 times more frequently provided to patient with longer diabetes duration and 2 times more frequently provided to those who had history of diabetic foot ulcer. Meanwhile, foot examination was 1.5 times more frequently provided to those with longer diabetes duration and had a history of Lower Extremity Amputation. Compare to non-endocrinologist internist, endocrinologists tend to provide foot education and perform foot examination 2.2 to 2.5 times more frequently than non-endocrinologists.
Conclusion Most of patients with high risk foot problems were not offered adequate foot care. It is necessary to develop strategies to improve the care and awareness among health professionals treating patients with diabetes especially internist.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study had been approved by ethical committee of Fatmawati General Hospital 021/KPP/XI/2016
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, IAK, upon reasonable request.
