Abstract
Background Patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) experience worse outcomes following hospital discharge. Care transition programs are common, yet little is known about the disparities in quality (process and outcome measures) experienced by patients with LEP.
Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study to determine the association of LEP and care transition quality at an urban, US academic hospital. We examined all adults discharge home from the hospital from May 2018 through April 2019. All patients received a multilingual, automated telephone call three days after discharge to assess and address patient-reported issues. We determined care transition quality using process measures (reach rate, time to resolve reported issue) and outcome measures (discharge instructions questions, difficulty obtaining prescriptions, medication concerns, follow up care questions, new or worsening symptoms, any other clinical issues). All results were adjusted for measured confounders; we used predicted probabilities and average marginal effect (AME) to describe associations.
Results 13,860 patients were included in the study; 11% had LEP. The program reached most patients regardless of LEP status but was less likely to reach patients with LEP (AME 3.3%; 95% CI, 1.4% to 5.1%). After adjustment, patients with LEP reported high rates of all measured patient-reported outcomes: discharge instruction (AME 4.8%; 95% CI, 2.7% to 6.9%), obtaining prescriptions (AME 2.9%; 95% CI, 0.6% to 5.1%), medications concerns (AME 2.3%; 95% CI, 0.0% to 4.6%), follow up questions (AME 2.8%; 95% CI, 0.3% to 5.3%), new or worsening symptoms (AME 3.2%; 95% CI, 0.7% to 5.8%), and any other clinical issues (AME 3.6%; 95% CI, 1.1% to 6.1%). When issues were identified, the association between LEP and time to resolution of an issue was statistically, but not clinically, significant.
Conclusion and Relevance Among patients with LEP, substantial disparities exist in patient-reported post-discharge outcome measures indicating a need for better discharge processes that focus on quality and health equity. Following discharge, relatively minor disparities were observed in the processes of a care transitions program that supports non-English languages.
Competing Interest Statement
All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author). LM, MG, LK, and SJS have nothing to disclose. KG reports that she was employed by the third party (CipherHealth) prior to her employment at UCSF and prior to any involvement with this study.
Funding Statement
This study was supported the UCSF Division of Hospital Medicine, and the UCSF Office of Population Health. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board at the University of California, San Francisco, approved this study (IRB# 19-27987).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Revised cohort development figure and associated text.
Data Availability
Researchers can contact the corresponding author to access to the data. Code used to generate the cohort and perform the analyses can be found on github (https://github.com/sachinjshah).
