Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, evidence has accumulated that movement restrictions enacted to combat virus spread produce disparate consequences along socioeconomic lines. One explanation for this differential impact is the distribution of people into occupations that can be performed from home and may provide greater financial security. However, little is known about the nature and scale of shifting home-based work patterns and their geographic distribution, despite this being a likely determinant of the success of geographically defined COVID-19 lockdown strategies. We investigate the hypothesis that people engaged in financially secure employment are better able to adapt to mobility restrictions, due to common occupational factors. In the context of two Australian urban centres, we test this hypothesis by analysing changes to home-based internet usage and quantify the relationship between area-level measures of population income security, the ability to perform job requirements remotely, and the degree of transition to home-based work during COVID-19. Our analysis confirms that financial security in Australia is geographically clustered and concentrated. Income security is also correlated with increased internet traffic during work hours under lockdown, and home-based work patterns that persist post-lockdown. Our findings suggest that geographic diversity in preparedness for government-imposed restrictions should be factored into response planning and provision of social and economic support for residents within lockdown areas.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Cameron Zachreson, Nicholas Geard, and Martin Tomko were supported by an internal seed grant from the Melbourne School of Engineering, of the University of Melbourne.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The CARE study was by approved by the University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee (2056694).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All processed data necessary for reproducing the figures and results of this paper is available in the GitHub repository located here: https://github.com/cjzachreson/Internet_Income_and_COVID19_in_Australia. Access to raw data from the HILDA survey, nbn(TM), and CARE survey was obtained under restricted access agreements and cannot be made directly available. However, arrangements for access may be made for eligible researchers. All ABS data can be accessed by following the instructions provided here: https://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/D3310114.nsf/home/How+to+Apply+f+r+Microdata.
https://github.com/cjzachreson/Internet_Income_and_COVID19_in_Australia
https://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/D3310114.nsf/home/How+to+Apply+for+Microdata
