Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Single-Blind and Double-Blind Peer Review: Effects on National Representation

Meghana Kalavar, Arjun Watane, David Wu, Jayanth Sridhar, Prithvi Mruthyunjaya, Ravi Parikh
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.28.21250707
Meghana Kalavar
1Bascom Palmer Eye Institute at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine. 900 NW 17 Street. Miami, FL 33136
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arjun Watane
1Bascom Palmer Eye Institute at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine. 900 NW 17 Street. Miami, FL 33136
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Wu
2Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospitals Baltimore, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jayanth Sridhar
1Bascom Palmer Eye Institute at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine. 900 NW 17 Street. Miami, FL 33136
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Prithvi Mruthyunjaya
3Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ravi Parikh
4Manhattan Retina and Eye Consultants New York, NY
5New York University Langone Health New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rap120@mail.harvard.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Objectives To assess whether the type of peer-review (single-blinded vs double-blinded) has an impact on nationality representation in journals.

Methods A cross-sectional study analyzing the top ten nationalities contributing to the number of articles across 16 ophthalmology journals.

Results There was no significant difference in the percentage of articles published from the journal’s country of origin between the top single-blind journals and top double-blind journals (SB= 42.0%, DB = 26.6%, p=0.49) but there was a significant difference between the percentage of articles from the US (SB=48.0%, DB=22.8%, p=0.02). However, there was no significant difference for both country of origin (SB =38.0%, DB =26.6%, p=0.43) and articles from the US (SB=35.0%, DB=22.8%, p=0.21) when assessing the top 8 double-blind journals matched with single-blind journals of a similar impact factor. The countries that most commonly made the top ten lists for highest number of articles were the US (n=16, 100%) and England (n=16, 100%). This held true even for journals established outside the United States (US=11/12, England=11/12).

Conclusions There was no statistically significant difference in country-of-origin representation between single-blind journals and double-blind journals. However, higher income countries contributed most often to the journals studied even among journals based outside the US.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No financial support was provided for this study

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The research adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and need for Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was waived by the University of Miami IRB.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Meeting Presentation: This data has not been submitted nor presented at any local or national conferences

  • Financial Support: No Financial Support was provided for this study

  • Conflict of Interest: Dr. Sridhar is a consultant for Alcon, Dorc, Regeneron, and Oxurion. Dr. Parikh is a consultant for Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield.

Data Availability

All data was collected from the Journal Citation Reports produced by the Institute of Scientific Information

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 01, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Single-Blind and Double-Blind Peer Review: Effects on National Representation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Single-Blind and Double-Blind Peer Review: Effects on National Representation
Meghana Kalavar, Arjun Watane, David Wu, Jayanth Sridhar, Prithvi Mruthyunjaya, Ravi Parikh
medRxiv 2021.01.28.21250707; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.28.21250707
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Single-Blind and Double-Blind Peer Review: Effects on National Representation
Meghana Kalavar, Arjun Watane, David Wu, Jayanth Sridhar, Prithvi Mruthyunjaya, Ravi Parikh
medRxiv 2021.01.28.21250707; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.28.21250707

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Ophthalmology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (70)
  • Allergy and Immunology (168)
  • Anesthesia (50)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (451)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (83)
  • Dermatology (55)
  • Emergency Medicine (157)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (191)
  • Epidemiology (5258)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (195)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (757)
  • Geriatric Medicine (80)
  • Health Economics (213)
  • Health Informatics (698)
  • Health Policy (358)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (223)
  • Hematology (99)
  • HIV/AIDS (163)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5867)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (361)
  • Medical Education (104)
  • Medical Ethics (25)
  • Nephrology (83)
  • Neurology (764)
  • Nursing (43)
  • Nutrition (130)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (142)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (231)
  • Oncology (479)
  • Ophthalmology (152)
  • Orthopedics (38)
  • Otolaryngology (95)
  • Pain Medicine (39)
  • Palliative Medicine (20)
  • Pathology (141)
  • Pediatrics (223)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (136)
  • Primary Care Research (96)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (862)
  • Public and Global Health (2011)
  • Radiology and Imaging (348)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (158)
  • Respiratory Medicine (285)
  • Rheumatology (94)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (74)
  • Sports Medicine (76)
  • Surgery (109)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (39)