Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Ownership and COVID-19 in care homes for older people: A living systematic review of outbreaks, infections, and mortalities

View ORCID ProfileAnders Malthe Bach-Mortensen, View ORCID ProfileBen Verboom, View ORCID ProfileMichelle Degli Esposti
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.28.21250547
Anders Malthe Bach-Mortensen
aUniversity of Oxford, Department of Social Policy and Intervention; Barnett House, 32 Wellington Square; Oxford; UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anders Malthe Bach-Mortensen
  • For correspondence: anders.bach-mortensen@spi.ox.ac.uk
Ben Verboom
aUniversity of Oxford, Department of Social Policy and Intervention; Barnett House, 32 Wellington Square; Oxford; UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ben Verboom
Michelle Degli Esposti
aUniversity of Oxford, Department of Social Policy and Intervention; Barnett House, 32 Wellington Square; Oxford; UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michelle Degli Esposti
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The adult social care sector is being increasingly outsourced to for-profit providers, but the impacts of privatisation on service quality and resident outcomes are unclear. During the COVID-19 pandemic, for-profit providers have been accused of failing their residents by prioritising profits over care, prevention, and caution, which has been reported to result in a higher prevalence of COVID-19 infections and deaths in for-profit care homes. Although many of these reports are anecdotal or based on news reports, there is a growing body of academic research investigating ownership variation across COVID-19 outcomes, which has not been systematically appraised and synthesised.

Objectives To identify, appraise, and synthesise the available research on ownership variation in COVID-19 outcomes (outbreaks, infections, deaths, shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) and staff) across for-profit, public, and non-profit care homes for older people, and to update our findings as new research becomes available.

Design Living systematic review.

Methods This review was prospectively registered with Prospero (CRD42020218673). We searched 17 databases and performed forward and backward citation tracking of all included studies. Search results were screened and reviewed in duplicate. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed in duplicate according to the COSMOS-E guidance. The results were synthesised according to RoB, model adjustment, and country context and visualised using harvest plots.

Results Twenty-eight studies across five countries were included, with 75% of included studies conducted in the Unites States. For-profit ownership was not consistently associated with a higher probability of COVID-19 outbreaks across included studies. However, there was compelling evidence of worse COVID-19 outcomes following an outbreak; with for-profit care homes having higher rates of accumulative infections and deaths. For-profit providers were also associated with shortages in PPE, which may have contributed to the higher incidence of infections and deaths.

Chain affiliation was often found to be correlated with higher risk of outbreaks, but not consistently associated with an elevated number of deaths and infections. Private equity ownership was not consistently associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes.

Conclusion For-profit status was a consistent risk factor for higher cumulative COVID-19 infections and deaths. Thus, ownership among providers may be a key modifiable factor which can be regulated to improve health outcomes in vulnerable populations and reduce health disparities. This review will be updated as new research becomes published, which may change the conclusion of our synthesis.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Protocols

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=218673

https://osf.io/c8dq9/

Funding Statement

Anders Bach-Mortensen is supported by a research fellowship from the Carlsberg Foundation. The funder was not involved in the research process.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Not applicable.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Most of the data represented in available in the manuscript or in the supplementary material. Additional data is available upon request. Our protocol is available online on Prospero (CRD42020218673) and on OSF (osf.io/c8dq9/). The authors affirm that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned have been explained.

https://osf.io/c8dq9/

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 29, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ownership and COVID-19 in care homes for older people: A living systematic review of outbreaks, infections, and mortalities
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Ownership and COVID-19 in care homes for older people: A living systematic review of outbreaks, infections, and mortalities
Anders Malthe Bach-Mortensen, Ben Verboom, Michelle Degli Esposti
medRxiv 2021.01.28.21250547; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.28.21250547
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Ownership and COVID-19 in care homes for older people: A living systematic review of outbreaks, infections, and mortalities
Anders Malthe Bach-Mortensen, Ben Verboom, Michelle Degli Esposti
medRxiv 2021.01.28.21250547; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.28.21250547

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Policy
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (76)
  • Allergy and Immunology (195)
  • Anesthesia (54)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (489)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (89)
  • Dermatology (56)
  • Emergency Medicine (168)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (211)
  • Epidemiology (5674)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (215)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (863)
  • Geriatric Medicine (88)
  • Health Economics (230)
  • Health Informatics (761)
  • Health Policy (390)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (250)
  • Hematology (105)
  • HIV/AIDS (182)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (6467)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (390)
  • Medical Education (117)
  • Medical Ethics (28)
  • Nephrology (90)
  • Neurology (846)
  • Nursing (44)
  • Nutrition (141)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (162)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (258)
  • Oncology (514)
  • Ophthalmology (163)
  • Orthopedics (44)
  • Otolaryngology (105)
  • Pain Medicine (48)
  • Palliative Medicine (21)
  • Pathology (149)
  • Pediatrics (250)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (146)
  • Primary Care Research (113)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (963)
  • Public and Global Health (2224)
  • Radiology and Imaging (376)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (174)
  • Respiratory Medicine (312)
  • Rheumatology (109)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (80)
  • Sports Medicine (82)
  • Surgery (118)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (34)
  • Urology (42)