Prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes among Bangladeshi adults and associated factors: Evidence from the Demographic and Health Survey, 2017-18

2.1. Study population and data collection

Bangladesh, a Southeast Asian country, has a current population of 111 million aged 18 years and older[17], which ranked 10^th in the world for cases of diabetes in 2019[4]. In 2017-18, the National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Bangladesh conducted the second BDHS survey of its kind that collected data on blood pressure, fasting blood glucose (FBG) biomarker measurements, and relevant information in addition to socio-demographic characteristics[7]. The ICF International provided technical assistance as part of the Demographic and Health Survey Program, while the US Agency for International Development provided financial support.

The BDHS is a nationally representative survey conducted using a two-stage stratified sample of households, including strata for rural and urban areas. Detail survey sampling and the data collection procedure has been published in the BDHS survey report [7]. The primary sampling units (PSUs), which each contain 120 households on average, were taken from the most recent 2011 Bangladesh census enumeration areas. In BDHS 2017-18, a total of 675 PSUs were selected with probability proportional to PSU size. A total of 672 PSUs were included (three PSUs were not sampled due to flooding), of which 192 and 480 were from urban and rural areas, respectively. In the second stage, 30 households per PSU was selected using systematic random sampling to provide statistically reliable estimates of health outcomes for the country as a whole, for each of the eight divisions as well as for urban and rural areas separately. Of the 19,584 eligible households, interviews were completed in 19,457 households with an overall 99.4% household response rate. Of these, one-fourth of the selected households were interviewed, and 8,013 women and 6,691 men aged 18 years and older were selected for blood glucose measurement.

The survey, including biomarker measurements, was approved by the institutional review board of ICF and the National Research Ethics Committee of the Bangladesh Medical Research Council. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

2.2. Definition of diabetes and prediabetes

The primary outcomes in this study were diabetes and prediabetes calculated based on the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level. The HemoCue Glucose 201 DM system with plasma conversion was used to test a drop of capillary blood obtained from consenting eligible respondents from the middle or ring finger after they had fasted overnight. The system automatically converted the fasting whole blood glucose measurements taken in the survey to FPG equivalent values[7]. The World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for diabetes and prediabetes classification were used[18]. Diabetes was defined as a FPG level greater than or equal to 7.0 mmol/L or self-reported diabetes medication use. Prediabetes was defined as a FPG level from 6.1 mmol/L to 6.9 mmol/L, without medication[18].

2.3. Explanatory variables

Explanatory variables included individual, household and community-level factors. Individual-level factors included were participants’ age, sex, body mass index, educational level, working status, and hypertension. The presence of hypertension was defined as a systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg, or currently on treatment with antihypertensive medication[19]. Household wealth quintile (lowest to highest) was the household-level factor. It was derived from the household wealth index reported in the BDHS, which was constructed using principal component analysis from household’s durable and non-durable assets (e.g., televisions, bicycles, sources of drinking water, sanitation facilities and construction materials)[20]. Community-level factors included were the place of residence and administrative divisions of the country.

2.4. Statistical analysis

The crude prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes were estimated by adjusting survey sampling weight and complex survey design. To account for different age distributions between groups and over time, we derived estimates that were age-standardized to the 2011 Census population of Bangladesh using the direct method, with age categories of 18–29, 30– 39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-64 and ≥65 years. Whether people with diabetes were different from people without diabetes was tested using Mann-Whitney test or chi-square test for continuous and categorical variable, respectively.

We used a multilevel Poisson regression model with a robust variance to identify factors associated with diabetes and prediabetes, and results were presented as prevalence ratio (PR) with 95% CIs. We used this model, firstly, the odds ratio estimated using logistic regression from a cross-sectional study may significantly overestimate relative risk when the outcome is common[21, 22]. Secondly, in the BDHS, individuals were nested within the household; households were nested within the PSU/cluster. Our multilevel mixed-effects Poisson regression model account for these multiple hierarchies and dependency in data, and the problem of overestimation [23]. Four models were run separately for diabetes and pre-diabetes for different sets of confounding factors at the individual, household, and community levels with progressive model-building technique. Model 1 was run without confounding factors to determine the cluster level variation of diabetes and pre-diabetes in Bangladesh. Model 2 and 3 were adjusted for individual, and individual plus household level factors, respectively. Model 4 was the final model that included individual, household, and community-level factors simultaneously. The Intra-Class Correlation (ICC), Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC) were used for model selection. All statistical tests were two-sided, and a p-value < 0·05 was considered statistically significant. The study was designed and reported in accordance with strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines[24]²⁵. All analyses were performed using statistical software packages Stata (version 15·10; Stata Corp LP, College Station, Texas).

4.1. Summary of key findings

Diabetes and prediabetes affect a substantial proportion of the Bangladeshi population. Based on data from the latest BDHS 2017-18, over one-quarter of individuals aged 18 years and older had diabetes or prediabetes in Bangladesh, representing in excess of 25 million individuals in 2020. Factors associated with diabetes were age, sex, BMI, wealth quintile, employment status, hypertension and administrative division of the country but not the place of residence (urban /rural) or level of education. They confirm a continuing high burden of diabetes and prediabetes in Bangladesh.

4.2. Comparison with existing literature

The prevalence of diabetes we have found is higher than the overall age-adjusted diabetes prevalence of 11.3% in the Southeast Asian region, estimated by the IDF in 2019[4]. The IDF has identified that the countries with the largest numbers of adults with diabetes aged 20–79 years in 2019 in the region are China (116 million cases) and India (77 million cases)[4]. In 2019, the IDF ranked Bangladesh 10^th of countries with the highest number of adults (20–79 years) with diabetes (8.4 million cases), and it is expected to be ranked 9^th in 2030 and 2045[4]. Our data confirm that cases in Bangladesh are very high. In our analysis, over 1 in 10 adults (18+) had diabetes, representing an estimated 14 million individuals in 2020. This large number of cases in Bangladesh indicate that it is one of the leading countries for diabetes burden in Southeast Asian region and underlines the urgent need for policies supporting the rollout of diabetes prevention in this country.

Our study undertook an identical methodological approach, (e.g. anthropometric measurements and fasting blood samples), to the 2011 study and demonstrated that the prevalence of diabetes has increased markedly in Bangladesh over 7 years[5]. Similar increasing trends of diabetes have been observed in other Southeast Asian countries[25]. However, the extent to which changes in traditional diabetes risk factors can explain the increasing trends in prevalence of diabetes in this setting needs further investigation. A higher diabetes prevalence suggests that despite greater global awareness of diabetes and interventions for improved non-communicable disease management in primary health care[26], diabetes in Bangladesh is increasing. It suggests that health promotion may be failing in the face of dietary and lifestyles patterns that result in diabetes. Thus, more resources are needed to be invested in primary health care to address the prevention of diabetes in Bangladesh.

Our estimates suggest that the prevalence of prediabetes has decreased in Bangladesh in the 7 years between 2011 and 2017/18 [5]. Prediabetes is important as it is a time when micro-vascular complications are occurring, often without people knowing they are glucose intolerant. The literature shows that up to 40.5% of individual with prediabetes convert to diabetes during follow-up[27]. A high conversion rate of prediabetes to diabetes is indicative of the potential for an uncontrolled increase in prevalence of diabetes. The observation that diabetes prevalence has increased but prediabetes has decreased in 7 years may indicate higher than expected conversion rates possibly due to rapidly changing environmental conditions [27]. Changes in insulin resistance or beta cell activity (or both) may contribute that need further investigation in the Bangladeshi population. Further declines in prediabetes may be achievable as it is a reversible condition through lifestyle modification[28]. The policy implication is that diabetes prevention programmes need to continue targeting those with prediabetes to help delay this preventable disease early in its pathogenesis, reducing disease burden[29].

There was a positive association between increasing age and risk of diabetes in Bangladesh, consistent with well-established relationships in the literature [4, 30]. The implication of this is that with increasing life expectancy in Bangladesh (current life expectancy at birth 72.3 years)[31] the increasing numbers of older people will result in even more cases and a higher burden of diabetes.

Consistent with our study, world literature shows that obesity is a leading risk factor for type 2 diabetes[32]. However, the association between obesity and diabetes is complicated as obesity is also related to socioeconomic status. We observed a significantly higher prevalence of diabetes in the highest wealth quintile than the lowest wealth quintile. A possible explanation is that those in the highest wealth quintile in developing economies use disposable income to purchase western, high energy food (‘nutrition transition’) and avoid physically demanding tasks as symbols of status[33]. This results in obesity which in turn is associated with diabetes. Increasing obesity in Bangladesh[11] may also be due to reduced physical activity associated with changing traditional agricultural/domestic works replaced by technology, watching television and using internet. Conversely, in high-income countries, high socioeconomic status is not associated with obesity[34]. A reason may be that in higher-income countries, high socioeconomic status individuals use their resources to eat healthy diets and take regular exercise (e.g. personal trainers). Irrespective of the explanation, increasing obesity in Bangladesh suggests that diabetes will increase further with its strengthening economy. A further policy implication is that interventions for diabetes prevention in Bangladesh need to focus on obesity in particular, by reducing the consumption of unhealthy diets and increasing physical activity. This should be given priority as there is evidence that even modest weight reduction of 5-7% in high risk individuals result a declines in the incidence of diabetes[28].

In Bangladesh, adults’ fat distribution rather than BMI per se, may result in a pattern of metabolic abnormalities associated diabetes. Central obesity and insulin resistance are higher in the people from South Asian (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh) origin than other ethnic groups of similar BMI[35]. Further, the risk may accumulate over the life-course as these patterns have been found to be in South Asians from birth [36]. Recent studies suggest that South Asians not only have high rates of insulin resistance, but an early decline in β-cell function as well a phenomenon with genetic underpinnings [34, 37]. These observations need further investigation in the Bangladeshi population to see if they contribute to the substantial diabetes prevalence we have observed in 2017-18, in addition to traditional risk factors.

Our data also show that the prevalence of diabetes is higher in people with hypertension, which is in agreement with other studies[38, 39]. Hypertension is exacerbated by other risk factors such as obesity, advanced age and significantly contributes to micro and macrovascular complications resulting in renal failure[40] and cardiovascular disease[38]. Pathways through which these complications may occur include insulin resistance, inflammation and obesity[15]. The implication of the strong association of hypertension and diabetes is that efforts are needed in Bangladesh to delay or prevent comorbid hypertension in diabetes through frequent follow-up and aggressive management.

Three out of five people living with diabetes in Bangladesh did not know that they had it, and only a third were receiving appropriate treatment. Renewed efforts are needed to increase awareness, treatment, and control to improve diabetes outcomes. Obesogenic environments such as walkable neighbourhoods and encouraging healthy food choices in schools and cafeterias should be developed as interventions to address non-communicable diseases, including diabetes, in Bangladesh. However, there is evidence that the Bangladesh health care system, which is orientated to communicable diseases[41], is struggling to address non-communicable disease prevention adequately [42]. This is due to lifestyle changes resulting from the epidemiological transition and rapid urbanisation[42]. The Bangladesh government is making progress in achieving universal health coverage; however, barriers include large out-of-pocket expenditure [43]. It places a financial burden on households, and has the effect of preventing people from accessing care (health care is viewed as a ‘luxury’ not a ‘necessity’) or seeking alternative providers who are cheaper, but untrained and cause adverse effects[44]. These barriers may undermine diabetes prevention efforts. However, future health promotion policy needs to prioritise affordable, high quality public health programmes for the prevention and management of diabetes.

4.3. Methodological considerations

The strengths of the study are that it used a large, nationally representative dataset suggesting the findings have external validity. A further strength of the study is that clinical variables including FBG, blood pressure and body weight and height were measured using high-quality techniques. The WHO criteria for the classification of diabetes and prediabetes were used while hypertension was defined using the seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of high blood pressure criteria. Our multilevel mixed-effects Poisson regression corrects the problem of overestimation of effects size produced by conventional logistic regression employed in cross-sectional studies, and increased the precision of the findings. However, this was a cross-sectional study, which limits our ability to infer causal relationships among the risk factors. A further limitation was that diabetes medication use was self-reported. Dietary and physical activity data were not collected and so could not be controlled for in the analysis. In future, collection of diet and physical activity data, and measures of central obesity, insulin resistance and beta-cell function will help to elucidate causal mechanisms accounting for the increasing prevalence of diabetes, but declining prevalence of prediabetes, in Bangladesh.

4.4. Implications of findings

This study implies that efforts to control diabetes and prediabetes in Bangladesh need to be strenghten. Further investment of resources is needed to manage these conditions. Diabetes and prediabetes are preventable diseases through modification of diet and physical activities. Given that these are preventable diseases, Bangladesh needs to redouble efforts to implement diabetes prevention. This may require the health care system changes in which non-communicable disease prevention is prioritized and household medical care payments reviewed to reduce out-of-pocket expenses. These measures will be worth the investment as they will maximize access to high-quality public health programmes. A further implication of our analysis is that diabetes prevention should focus of reducing obesity and managing hypertension, particularly in men and those with disposable income. These factors were strongly associated with diabetes, suggesting that their management will bring the greatest benefits. Without effective preventive measures, diabetes will continue to increase in Bangladesh.