Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Fallow time determination in dentistry using aerosol measurement

Shakeel Shahdad, Annika Hindocha, Tulsi Patel, Neil Cagney, Jens-Dominik Mueller, Amine Kochid, Noha Seoudi, Claire Morgan, Padhraig Fleming, Ahmed Riaz Din
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.26.21250482
Shakeel Shahdad
1Barts and The London School of⍰Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Dental Hospital, London UK
Roles: Honorary Clinical Professor in Oral⍰Rehabilitation & Implantology and Consultant in Restorative Dentistry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: shakeel.shahdad@nhs.net
Annika Hindocha
2Restorative Dentistry and General Duties, Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Dental Hospital, London UK
Roles: Dental Core Trainee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tulsi Patel
2Restorative Dentistry and General Duties, Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Dental Hospital, London UK
Roles: Dental Core Trainee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neil Cagney
4School of Engineering and Materials Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Mile End, Road, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS
Roles: Lecturer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jens-Dominik Mueller
5School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS
Roles: Reader in Computational Fluid Dynamics and Optimisation
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amine Kochid
6TSI Inc USA
Roles: Research and Analytical Application Specialist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Noha Seoudi
7Centre for Oral Immunobiology and Regenerative Medicine, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 2AD
Roles: Senior Clinical Lecturer in Oral Microbiology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claire Morgan
8Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Dental Hospital, London UK
Roles: Consultant in Restorative Dentistry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Padhraig Fleming
1Barts and The London School of⍰Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Dental Hospital, London UK
Roles: Professor in Orthodontics and Consultant in Orthodontics
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ahmed Riaz Din
8Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Dental Hospital, London UK
Roles: Post-CCST Speciality Registrar in Orthodontics
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim To calculate fallow time (FT) required following dental aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) in both a dental hospital (mechanically ventilated) and primary care (non-mechanically ventilated). Secondary outcomes were to identify spread and persistence of aerosol in open clinics compared to closed surgeries (mechanically ventilated environment), and identify if extra-oral scavenging (EOS) reduces production of aerosol and FT.

Methods In vitro simulation of fast handpiece (FHP) cavity preparations using a manikin was conducted in a mechanically and non-mechanically ventilated environment using Optical Particle Sizer™ and NanoScan™ at baseline, during the procedure and fallow period.

Results AGPs carried out in the non-mechanically, non-ventilated environment failed to achieve baseline particle levels after one hour. In contrast, when windows were opened after AGP, there was an immediate reduction in all particle sizes.

In mechanically ventilated environments the baseline levels of particles were very low and particle count returned to baseline within 10 minutes following AGP. There was no detectable difference between particles in mechanically ventilated open bays and closed surgeries.

The effect of the EOS was greater in non-mechanically ventilated environment on reducing the particle count; additionally, it also reduced the spikes in particle counts in mechanically ventilated environments.

Conclusion High-efficiency particulate air filtered mechanical ventilation along with mitigating factors (high-volume suction) resulted in reduction of FT (10 minutes). Non-ventilated rooms failed to reach baseline level even after one hour of FT. There was no difference in particle counts in open bay or closed surgeries in mechanically ventilated settings. The use of an EOS device can reduce the particulate spikes during procedures in both mechanical and non-mechanical environments.

This study confirms that AGPs are not recommended in dental surgeries where no ventilation is possible. No difference was demonstrated in FT required in open bays and closed surgeries in mechanically ventilated settings.

Clinical significance AGPs should not be carried out in surgeries where ventilation is not possible. Mechanical ventilation for AGPs should be gold standard; where not available or practical then the use of natural ventilation with EOS helps reduce FT. AGPs can be carried out in open bay environment with a minimum of 6 air changes per hour of mechanical ventilation. Four-handed dentistry with high-volume suction and saliva ejector are essential mitigating factors during AGPs.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Funding received through Barts Charity

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

No Ethical Approval was needed

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Role: Contributed to conception, design, data acquisition and interpretation, drafted and critically revised the manuscript

  • Role: Design, data acquisition, drafted and critically revised the manuscript

  • Role: Design, data acquisition, drafted and critically revised the manuscript

  • Role: Contributed to conception, design, interpretation, drafted and critically revised the manuscript

  • Role: Contributed to conception, design, interpretation and critically revised the manuscript

  • Role: Contributed to conception and interpretation

  • Role: Contributed to conception, design, interpretation and critically revised the manuscript

  • Role: Contributed to conception and critically revised the manuscript

  • Role: Contributed to conception, design, interpretation and critically revised the manuscript

  • Role: Contributed to conception, design, data acquisition and interpretation, drafted and critically revised the manuscript

  • All authors gave their final approval and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work

Data Availability

Raw data is available by contacting the authors

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 27, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Fallow time determination in dentistry using aerosol measurement
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Fallow time determination in dentistry using aerosol measurement
Shakeel Shahdad, Annika Hindocha, Tulsi Patel, Neil Cagney, Jens-Dominik Mueller, Amine Kochid, Noha Seoudi, Claire Morgan, Padhraig Fleming, Ahmed Riaz Din
medRxiv 2021.01.26.21250482; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.26.21250482
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Fallow time determination in dentistry using aerosol measurement
Shakeel Shahdad, Annika Hindocha, Tulsi Patel, Neil Cagney, Jens-Dominik Mueller, Amine Kochid, Noha Seoudi, Claire Morgan, Padhraig Fleming, Ahmed Riaz Din
medRxiv 2021.01.26.21250482; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.26.21250482

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (76)
  • Allergy and Immunology (202)
  • Anesthesia (55)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (495)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (91)
  • Dermatology (57)
  • Emergency Medicine (170)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (217)
  • Epidemiology (5744)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (220)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (881)
  • Geriatric Medicine (89)
  • Health Economics (233)
  • Health Informatics (776)
  • Health Policy (399)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (256)
  • Hematology (105)
  • HIV/AIDS (186)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (6573)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (396)
  • Medical Education (119)
  • Medical Ethics (28)
  • Nephrology (94)
  • Neurology (856)
  • Nursing (45)
  • Nutrition (143)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (166)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (264)
  • Oncology (520)
  • Ophthalmology (168)
  • Orthopedics (44)
  • Otolaryngology (107)
  • Pain Medicine (48)
  • Palliative Medicine (22)
  • Pathology (150)
  • Pediatrics (256)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (147)
  • Primary Care Research (116)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (989)
  • Public and Global Health (2262)
  • Radiology and Imaging (380)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (175)
  • Respiratory Medicine (313)
  • Rheumatology (109)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (83)
  • Sports Medicine (83)
  • Surgery (118)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (34)
  • Urology (42)