Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Ranking videolaryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopes by orotracheal intubation performance in children: protocol of a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials at patient level

Clístenes C Carvalho, Stéphanie LPA Regueira, Ana Beatriz S Souza, Lucas MLF Medeiros, Marielle BS Manoel
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.25.21250439
Clístenes C Carvalho
1Department of Post-graduation, Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, Brazil; department of surgery, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: clistenescristian@hotmail.com
Stéphanie LPA Regueira
1Department of Post-graduation, Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, Brazil; department of surgery, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ana Beatriz S Souza
1Department of Post-graduation, Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, Brazil; department of surgery, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lucas MLF Medeiros
1Department of Post-graduation, Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, Brazil; department of surgery, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marielle BS Manoel
1Department of Post-graduation, Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, Brazil; department of surgery, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background Videolaryngoscopy was shown to improve glottic visualization in children as compared to direct laryngoscopy, but at the expenses of delayed time for intubation. As little evidence is available regarding the relative performance of different laryngoscopes at present, we designed this systematic review and network meta-analysis to rank the different videolaryngoscopes (VLs) and direct laryngoscopes (DLs) for orotracheal intubation in children.

Methods We will conduct a search in PubMed, LILACS, Scielo, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2021, Issue 1) on 27/01/2021. We will include randomized clinical trials fully reported with patients aged ≤ 18 years, making comparisons between different types of laryngoscopes (any of both VLs and DLs) for failed first intubation attempt, intubation time, number of attempts at intubation or number of unsuccessful intubations, failed intubation, glottic view score, or adverse responses to endotracheal intubation. Pooled effects will be estimated by both fixed and random-effects models and presented according to qualitative and quantitative heterogeneity assessment. Sensitivity analyses will be performed as well as a priori subgroup, meta-regression and multiple meta-regression analyses. Additionally, network meta-analyses will be applied to rank the different VLs and DLs. We will also assess the risk of selective publication by funnel plot asymmetry.

Discussion This systematic review and network meta-analysis aim to understand which laryngoscopes perform better than others for orotracheal intubation.

Systematic review registration The current protocol was submitted to PROSPERO on 25/01/2021.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Not applicable

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • SUPPORT This systematic review will be authors’ own work and no financial support is expected.

Data Availability

Not applicable

Data Availability

Not applicable

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 30, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ranking videolaryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopes by orotracheal intubation performance in children: protocol of a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials at patient level
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Ranking videolaryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopes by orotracheal intubation performance in children: protocol of a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials at patient level
Clístenes C Carvalho, Stéphanie LPA Regueira, Ana Beatriz S Souza, Lucas MLF Medeiros, Marielle BS Manoel
medRxiv 2021.01.25.21250439; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.25.21250439
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Ranking videolaryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopes by orotracheal intubation performance in children: protocol of a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials at patient level
Clístenes C Carvalho, Stéphanie LPA Regueira, Ana Beatriz S Souza, Lucas MLF Medeiros, Marielle BS Manoel
medRxiv 2021.01.25.21250439; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.25.21250439

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Anesthesia
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (280)
  • Allergy and Immunology (580)
  • Anesthesia (141)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1970)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (253)
  • Dermatology (188)
  • Emergency Medicine (336)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (704)
  • Epidemiology (11134)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (632)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (3205)
  • Geriatric Medicine (310)
  • Health Economics (570)
  • Health Informatics (2055)
  • Health Policy (864)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (793)
  • Hematology (311)
  • HIV/AIDS (687)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12750)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (708)
  • Medical Education (320)
  • Medical Ethics (92)
  • Nephrology (339)
  • Neurology (3006)
  • Nursing (167)
  • Nutrition (466)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (592)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (614)
  • Oncology (1566)
  • Ophthalmology (478)
  • Orthopedics (189)
  • Otolaryngology (267)
  • Pain Medicine (204)
  • Palliative Medicine (57)
  • Pathology (404)
  • Pediatrics (916)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (387)
  • Primary Care Research (357)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2811)
  • Public and Global Health (5624)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1104)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (637)
  • Respiratory Medicine (765)
  • Rheumatology (342)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (316)
  • Sports Medicine (291)
  • Surgery (351)
  • Toxicology (48)
  • Transplantation (159)
  • Urology (133)