Abstract
There is a well-known association of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic experiences with body size and composition, including consistent differences between sexes. However, the biology underlying these associations is unclear. To understand this complex relationship, we investigated large-scale datasets from the Psychiatric Genomic Consortium (12 823 cases and 35 648 controls), the UK Biobank (up to 360 000 individuals), and the GIANT (Genetic Investigation of Anthropometric Traits) Consortium (up to 339 224 individuals). We used genome-wide association statistics to estimate sex-specific genetic correlations (rg) among PTSD, traumatic experiences, social support, and multiple anthropometric traits. After multiple testing corrections (false discovery rate, FDR q<0.05), we observed 58 significant rg relationships in females (e.g., childhood physical abuse and body mass index, BMI rg=0.245, p=3.88×10−10) and 21 significant rg relationships in males (e.g., been involved in combat or exposed to warzone and leg fat percentage; rg=0.405, p=4.42×10−10). We performed causal inference analyses of these genetic overlaps using Mendelian randomization and latent causal variable approaches. Multiple female-specific putative causal relationships were observed linking body composition/size with PTSD (e.g., leg fat percentage➔PTSD; beta=0.319, p=3.13×10−9), traumatic experiences (e.g., childhood physical abuse➔waist circumference; beta=0.055, p=5.07×10−4), and childhood neglect (e.g., “someone to take you to doctor when needed as a child”➔BMI; beta=-0.594, p=1.09×10−5). In males, we observed putative causal effects linking anthropometric-trait genetic liabilities to traumatic experiences (e.g., BMI➔childhood physical abuse; beta=0.028, p=8.19×10−3). In conclusion, our findings provide insights regarding sex-specific causal networks linking anthropometric traits to PTSD, traumatic experiences, and social support.
Competing Interest Statement
D.J.S. received personal fees from Lundbeck and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries. R.P. and J.G. are paid for their editorial work on the journal Complex Psychiatry. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R21 DC018098, R21 DA047527, F32 MH122058, and R01MH106595). CMC and SIB were supported by Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP 2018/05995-4) international fellowship.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was conducted using publicly available summary association data generated by previous studies. Owing to the use of previously collected, unidentified, aggregated data, this study did not require institutional review board approval. Ethical approval had been obtained in all original studies.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data used to make conclusions discussed in this study are provided as Supplementary Material.
