Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy: Empirical Evidence from India*

View ORCID ProfilePramod Kumar Sur
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.21.21250216
Pramod Kumar Sur
1Asian Growth Research Institute (AGI) and Osaka University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Pramod Kumar Sur
  • For correspondence: pramodsur{at}gmail.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Why do vaccination rates remain low even in countries where long-established immunization programs exist and vaccines are provided for free? We study this paradox in the context of India, which contributes to the world’s largest pool of under-vaccinated children and about one-third of all vaccine-preventable deaths globally. Combining historical records with survey datasets, we examine the Indian government’s forced sterilization policy, a short-term aggressive family planning program implemented between 1976 and 1977. Using multiple estimation methods, including an instrumental variable (IV) and a geographic regression discontinuity design (RDD) approach, we document that the current vaccination completion rate is low in places where forced sterilization was high. We also explore the heterogeneous effects, mechanisms, and reasons for the mechanism. Finally, we examine the enduring consequence and present evidence that places more exposed to forced sterilization have an average 60 percent higher child mortality rate today. Together, these findings suggest that government policies implemented in the past can have persistent adverse impacts on demand for health-seeking behavior, even if the burden is exceedingly high.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

I am grateful for financial support from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (No. 21K13307).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

I use publicly available data for which no IRB is required.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • * I thank Esther Duflo for lucidly explaining the puzzles associated with vaccination in India, which became the primary motivation for this research. Additionally, I thank Nathan Nunn, Kensuke Teshima, Lucy Xiaolu Wang, Chikako Yamauchi, and numerous seminar and conference participants for their excellent feedback. All remaining errors are my own. I am grateful for financial support from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (No. 21K13307). This paper is revised extensively and supersedes earlier versions circulated under the title “Why is the Vaccination Rate Low in India?”

  • This paper is revised extensively and supersedes earlier versions circulated under the title "Why is the Vaccination Rate Low in India?"

Data Availability

All the data are publicly available and cited in the manuscript.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 28, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy: Empirical Evidence from India*
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy: Empirical Evidence from India*
Pramod Kumar Sur
medRxiv 2021.01.21.21250216; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.21.21250216
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy: Empirical Evidence from India*
Pramod Kumar Sur
medRxiv 2021.01.21.21250216; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.21.21250216

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Economics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (430)
  • Allergy and Immunology (755)
  • Anesthesia (221)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3288)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (364)
  • Dermatology (277)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1169)
  • Epidemiology (13359)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (898)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5147)
  • Geriatric Medicine (481)
  • Health Economics (782)
  • Health Informatics (3264)
  • Health Policy (1140)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1190)
  • Hematology (429)
  • HIV/AIDS (1017)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14622)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (912)
  • Medical Education (476)
  • Medical Ethics (127)
  • Nephrology (522)
  • Neurology (4919)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (727)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (882)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2519)
  • Ophthalmology (723)
  • Orthopedics (280)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (543)
  • Pediatrics (1299)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (550)
  • Primary Care Research (556)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4205)
  • Public and Global Health (7499)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1704)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1011)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (479)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (497)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (547)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (235)
  • Urology (205)