Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Comparison study of commercial COVID-19 RT-PCR kits propose an approach to evaluate their performances

Hana Krismawati, View ORCID ProfileCaroline Mahendra, Annabelle Hartanto, Muhammad Fajri Rokhmad, Semuel Sandi, Astrid Irwanto
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.20.21250143
Hana Krismawati
1Institute of Research and Development for Biomedicine Papua, National Institute of Health Research and Development, Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline Mahendra
2Nalagenetics Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Caroline Mahendra
  • For correspondence: caroline@nalagenetics.com
Annabelle Hartanto
2Nalagenetics Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Muhammad Fajri Rokhmad
1Institute of Research and Development for Biomedicine Papua, National Institute of Health Research and Development, Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Semuel Sandi
1Institute of Research and Development for Biomedicine Papua, National Institute of Health Research and Development, Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Astrid Irwanto
2Nalagenetics Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore
3Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

With the increasing number of COVID-19 cases in Indonesia, scalable and high-throughput diagnostic testing is essential nationwide. Currently, RT-PCR has been the preferred method of viral detection and many manufacturers offer commercial kits for routine clinical diagnostics. In response to the incoming of various kits, there is a need to assess their performance and compatibility of use in clinical laboratories. Kit characteristics impact the testing workflow of these laboratories and some factors can render a kit to perform sub-optimally, leading to false results that are misleading for public safety. Here, we evaluated six commercial kits that are predominantly distributed to appointed testing facilities across Indonesia. Their performance was assessed based on their ease of use, availability, robustness and accuracy for scalable testing in a manual set-up. Our findings demonstrated that all six kits are suitable for use in routine diagnostics, but their considerations for use may vary according to different use-cases. To better guide considerations in procurement of kits, our study provided a systematic approach for laboratories to assess the performance of new incoming kits.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Authors did not receive specific funding for this work.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was approved for ethical clearance by the Health Research Ethics Committee of National Institute of Health Research and Development and expedited with waiver of informed consent. Ethical Approval No. : LB.02.01/2/KE.585/2020

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/supplementary material.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 26, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison study of commercial COVID-19 RT-PCR kits propose an approach to evaluate their performances
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Comparison study of commercial COVID-19 RT-PCR kits propose an approach to evaluate their performances
Hana Krismawati, Caroline Mahendra, Annabelle Hartanto, Muhammad Fajri Rokhmad, Semuel Sandi, Astrid Irwanto
medRxiv 2021.01.20.21250143; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.20.21250143
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Comparison study of commercial COVID-19 RT-PCR kits propose an approach to evaluate their performances
Hana Krismawati, Caroline Mahendra, Annabelle Hartanto, Muhammad Fajri Rokhmad, Semuel Sandi, Astrid Irwanto
medRxiv 2021.01.20.21250143; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.20.21250143

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (230)
  • Allergy and Immunology (507)
  • Anesthesia (111)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1255)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (206)
  • Dermatology (147)
  • Emergency Medicine (283)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (537)
  • Epidemiology (10044)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (500)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2477)
  • Geriatric Medicine (239)
  • Health Economics (482)
  • Health Informatics (1651)
  • Health Policy (756)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (638)
  • Hematology (250)
  • HIV/AIDS (536)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11886)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (626)
  • Medical Education (255)
  • Medical Ethics (75)
  • Nephrology (269)
  • Neurology (2298)
  • Nursing (140)
  • Nutrition (354)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (458)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (537)
  • Oncology (1255)
  • Ophthalmology (377)
  • Orthopedics (134)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (158)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (326)
  • Pediatrics (736)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (315)
  • Primary Care Research (282)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2291)
  • Public and Global Health (4849)
  • Radiology and Imaging (844)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (493)
  • Respiratory Medicine (654)
  • Rheumatology (288)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (241)
  • Sports Medicine (227)
  • Surgery (271)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (130)
  • Urology (100)