ABSTRACT
Transrenal urine cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a promising tuberculosis (TB) biomarker, but is challenging to detect because of the short length (<100 bp) and low concentration of TB-specific fragments. We aimed to improve the diagnostic sensitivity of TB urine cfDNA by increasing recovery of short fragments during sample preparation. We developed a highly sensitive sequence-specific purification method that uses hybridization probes immobilized on magnetic beads to capture short TB cfDNA (50 bp) with 91.8% average efficiency. Combined with short-target PCR, the assay limit of detection was ≤5 copies of cfDNA in 10 mL urine. In a clinical cohort study in South Africa, our urine cfDNA assay had 83.7% sensitivity (95% CI: 71.0– 91.5%) and 100% specificity (95% CI: 86.2–100%) for diagnosis of active pulmonary TB when using sputum Xpert MTB/RIF as the reference standard. The detected cfDNA concentration was 0.14–2804 copies/mL (median 14.6 copies/mL) and was inversely correlated with CD4 count and days to culture positivity. Sensitivity was non-significantly higher in HIV-positive (88.2%) compared to HIV-negative patients (73.3%), and was not dependent on CD4 count. Sensitivity remained high in sputum smear-negative (76.0%) and urine LAM-negative (76.5%) patients. With improved sample preparation, urine cfDNA is a viable biomarker for TB diagnosis. Our assay has the highest reported accuracy of any TB urine cfDNA test to date and has the potential to enable rapid non-sputum-based TB diagnosis across key underserved patient populations.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
http://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bep4jdqw
Funding Statement
Research reported in this publication was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation under award number OPP1152864 and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under award number R21AI125975. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. This research was funded in part by a 2018 CFAR developmental grant from the University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS Research, an NIH-funded program under award number AI027757 which is supported by the following NIH Institutes and Centers: NIAID, NCI, NIMH, NIDA, NICHD, NHLBI, NIA, NIGMS, NIDDK. A.O. was supported by funding from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The research described was approved by the University of KwaZulu-Natal Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (#BE475/18) and the University of Washington Institutional Review Board (#48840).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
These authors share senior authorship.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
