Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Ranking videolaryngoscopes by orotracheal intubation performance: protocol of a systematic review and network meta-analysis of clinical trials at patient level

Clístenes Crístian de Carvalho, Danielle Melo da Silva, Victor Macedo Lemos, Thiago Gadelha Batista dos Santos, Ikaro Cavalcante Agra, Gustavo Miná Pinto, Isabella Beserra Ramos, Yuri Soares da Cunha Costa, Jayme Marques dos Santos Neto
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.18.21250062
Clístenes Crístian de Carvalho
1Department of Post-graduation, Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, Brazil
2department of surgery, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: clistenescristian@hotmail.com
Danielle Melo da Silva
3Support and Therapeutic Diagnosis Division, Anesthesiology and post-anesthetic care unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victor Macedo Lemos
3Support and Therapeutic Diagnosis Division, Anesthesiology and post-anesthetic care unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thiago Gadelha Batista dos Santos
3Support and Therapeutic Diagnosis Division, Anesthesiology and post-anesthetic care unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ikaro Cavalcante Agra
4Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gustavo Miná Pinto
4Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isabella Beserra Ramos
4Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuri Soares da Cunha Costa
4Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jayme Marques dos Santos Neto
3Support and Therapeutic Diagnosis Division, Anesthesiology and post-anesthetic care unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background Videolaryngoscopes (VLs) are regarded to improve glottic visualization as compared to Macintosh laryngoscope (ML). However, we currently do not know which one would be the best choice. We then designed this systematic review and network meta-analysis to rank the different VLs as compared to ML.

Methods We will conduct a search in PubMed, LILACS, Scielo, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2020, Issue 6) on 11/01/2021. We will include randomized clinical trials fully reported with patients aged ≥ 16 years, comparing VLs with ML for failed intubation with the device, failed first intubation attempts, number of intubation attempts, time for intubation, difficulty of intubation, and improved visualization of the larynx. Pooled effects will be estimated by both fixed and random-effects models and presented according to qualitative and quantitative heterogeneity assessment. Sensitivity analyses will be performed as well as a priori subgroup, meta-regression and multiple meta-regression analyses. Additionally, network meta-analyses will be applied to rank the different VLs as compared to ML. We will also assess the risk of selective publication by funnel plot asymmetry.

Discussion This systematic review and network meta-analysis aim at helping health services and clinicians involved in airway manipulation choose the best VLs for orotracheal intubation.

Systematic review registration The current protocol was submitted to PROSPERO on 07/01/2021.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This systematic review will be authors own work and no financial support is expected.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Not applicable

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • E-mail: clistenescristian{at}hotmail.com, E-mail: danimelos{at}gmail.com, E-mail: vmlemos1992{at}gmail.com, E-mail: thiagogadelha1{at}gmail.com, E-mail: ikaroagra6{at}icloud.com, E-mail: gustavo.mina01{at}gmail.com, E-mail: isabellabeserramos{at}gmail.com, E-mail: uri.cost4{at}gmail.com, E-mail: jaymemed{at}yahoo.com.br

  • Writing of the protocol: CCC

  • Review of the protocol: JMSN, DMS, VML, T, ICA, GMP, IBR, YSCC

  • Final protocol approval: CCC, JMSN, DMS, VML, T, ICA, GMP, IBR, YSCC

  • SUPPORT This systematic review will be authors’ own work and no financial support is expected.

Data Availability

Not applicable

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 20, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ranking videolaryngoscopes by orotracheal intubation performance: protocol of a systematic review and network meta-analysis of clinical trials at patient level
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Ranking videolaryngoscopes by orotracheal intubation performance: protocol of a systematic review and network meta-analysis of clinical trials at patient level
Clístenes Crístian de Carvalho, Danielle Melo da Silva, Victor Macedo Lemos, Thiago Gadelha Batista dos Santos, Ikaro Cavalcante Agra, Gustavo Miná Pinto, Isabella Beserra Ramos, Yuri Soares da Cunha Costa, Jayme Marques dos Santos Neto
medRxiv 2021.01.18.21250062; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.18.21250062
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Ranking videolaryngoscopes by orotracheal intubation performance: protocol of a systematic review and network meta-analysis of clinical trials at patient level
Clístenes Crístian de Carvalho, Danielle Melo da Silva, Victor Macedo Lemos, Thiago Gadelha Batista dos Santos, Ikaro Cavalcante Agra, Gustavo Miná Pinto, Isabella Beserra Ramos, Yuri Soares da Cunha Costa, Jayme Marques dos Santos Neto
medRxiv 2021.01.18.21250062; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.18.21250062

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Anesthesia
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (76)
  • Allergy and Immunology (202)
  • Anesthesia (55)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (495)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (91)
  • Dermatology (57)
  • Emergency Medicine (170)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (217)
  • Epidemiology (5744)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (220)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (881)
  • Geriatric Medicine (89)
  • Health Economics (233)
  • Health Informatics (776)
  • Health Policy (399)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (256)
  • Hematology (105)
  • HIV/AIDS (186)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (6573)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (396)
  • Medical Education (119)
  • Medical Ethics (28)
  • Nephrology (94)
  • Neurology (856)
  • Nursing (45)
  • Nutrition (143)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (166)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (264)
  • Oncology (520)
  • Ophthalmology (168)
  • Orthopedics (44)
  • Otolaryngology (107)
  • Pain Medicine (48)
  • Palliative Medicine (22)
  • Pathology (150)
  • Pediatrics (256)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (147)
  • Primary Care Research (116)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (989)
  • Public and Global Health (2262)
  • Radiology and Imaging (380)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (175)
  • Respiratory Medicine (313)
  • Rheumatology (109)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (83)
  • Sports Medicine (83)
  • Surgery (118)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (34)
  • Urology (42)