Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Non-invasive brain stimulation effectiveness in anxiety disorder treatment: a meta-analysis on sham/behavior-controlled studies

Alessandra Vergallito, Alessia Gallucci, View ORCID ProfileAlberto Pisoni, Gabriele Caselli, Giovanni M. Ruggiero, Sandra Sassaroli, Leonor J. Romero Lauro
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.15.21249892
Alessandra Vergallito
1Department of Psychology, University of Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy
2Neuromi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alessia Gallucci
3Ph.D. Program in Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
2Neuromi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alberto Pisoni
1Department of Psychology, University of Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy
2Neuromi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alberto Pisoni
  • For correspondence: alberto.pisoni@unimib.it
Gabriele Caselli
4Studi Cognitivi, Milan, Italy
5Faculty of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University, Milan, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giovanni M. Ruggiero
4Studi Cognitivi, Milan, Italy
5Faculty of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University, Milan, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sandra Sassaroli
4Studi Cognitivi, Milan, Italy
5Faculty of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University, Milan, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leonor J. Romero Lauro
1Department of Psychology, University of Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy
2Neuromi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Recently, the possibility of using non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to treat mental disorders received considerable attention. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are considered effective treatments for depressive symptoms. However, no recommendation is available for anxiety disorders, suggesting that evidence is still limited.

Objective We systematically revised the existing literature, and quantitatively analyzed the effectiveness of rTMS and tDCS in anxiety disorders treatment.

Method Following PRISMA guidelines, 3 electronic databases were screened to the end of February 2020 to select English-written peer-reviewed articles including (i) a clinical sample of patients with anxiety disorders, (ii) the use of a NIBS technique, (iii) the inclusion of a control condition, and (iv) pre-post scores at a validated questionnaire measuring anxious symptoms.

Results Eleven papers met the inclusion criteria, comprising 154 participants assigned to the real stimulation condition and 164 to the sham or control group. The Hedge g for scores at disorder specific and general anxiety questionnaires before and after the treatment was computed as effect size and analyzed in two independent random-effects meta-analyses. Considering the well-known comorbidity between anxiety and depression, a third meta-analysis was run, analyzing depression scores outcomes. Results showed a significant effect of NIBS in reducing questionnaires scores in the real vs. control condition at specific and general anxiety measures, and depressive symptoms.

Conclusion Albeit preliminary, our findings highlighted that real stimulation reduced anxiety and depression scores compared to the control condition, suggesting that NIBS can alleviate clinical symptoms in patients with anxiety diseases.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

AV was supported in part by a 2019 NARSAD Young Investigator Grant from the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This is a meta-analysis, so we are not reporting patients data.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • AV was supported in part by a 2019 NARSAD Young Investigator Grant from the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation.

  • 1 Post-traumatic stress disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorders no longer fall in this grouping, and therefore will be not considered in the present meta-analysis.

  • 2 Only one study (Huang et al., 2018) targeted a region different from the left and right DLPFC, therefore we did not include it when analyzing the moderation effect of the target region.

  • 3 The UP is a transdiagnostic protocol treatment of emotional disorders, which aims at targeting common features of anxiety and mood disorders, using a single psychological treatment.

  • 4 The three results came from the combination of “deep TMS” AND “generalized anxiety disorder” 163, “deep TMS” AND “specific phobia” 164, “deep TMS” AND “social anxiety disorder” 165.

Data Availability

Data are available upon reasonable request

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 29, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Non-invasive brain stimulation effectiveness in anxiety disorder treatment: a meta-analysis on sham/behavior-controlled studies
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Non-invasive brain stimulation effectiveness in anxiety disorder treatment: a meta-analysis on sham/behavior-controlled studies
Alessandra Vergallito, Alessia Gallucci, Alberto Pisoni, Gabriele Caselli, Giovanni M. Ruggiero, Sandra Sassaroli, Leonor J. Romero Lauro
medRxiv 2021.01.15.21249892; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.15.21249892
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Non-invasive brain stimulation effectiveness in anxiety disorder treatment: a meta-analysis on sham/behavior-controlled studies
Alessandra Vergallito, Alessia Gallucci, Alberto Pisoni, Gabriele Caselli, Giovanni M. Ruggiero, Sandra Sassaroli, Leonor J. Romero Lauro
medRxiv 2021.01.15.21249892; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.15.21249892

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (179)
  • Allergy and Immunology (431)
  • Anesthesia (99)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (943)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (178)
  • Dermatology (109)
  • Emergency Medicine (260)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (419)
  • Epidemiology (8971)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (418)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1938)
  • Geriatric Medicine (190)
  • Health Economics (400)
  • Health Informatics (1323)
  • Health Policy (657)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (517)
  • Hematology (212)
  • HIV/AIDS (416)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10772)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (571)
  • Medical Education (200)
  • Medical Ethics (54)
  • Nephrology (221)
  • Neurology (1819)
  • Nursing (108)
  • Nutrition (271)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (351)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (469)
  • Oncology (992)
  • Ophthalmology (296)
  • Orthopedics (111)
  • Otolaryngology (182)
  • Pain Medicine (126)
  • Palliative Medicine (44)
  • Pathology (265)
  • Pediatrics (576)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (275)
  • Primary Care Research (234)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1892)
  • Public and Global Health (4111)
  • Radiology and Imaging (674)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (364)
  • Respiratory Medicine (548)
  • Rheumatology (224)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (190)
  • Sports Medicine (177)
  • Surgery (207)
  • Toxicology (38)
  • Transplantation (109)
  • Urology (80)