Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Mass Testing with Contact Tracing Compared to Test and Trace for Effective Suppression of COVID-19 in the UK: A rapid review

View ORCID ProfileMathew Mbwogge
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.13.21249749
Mathew Mbwogge
1Independent Scholar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mathew Mbwogge
  • For correspondence: m.mbwoge@gmail.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Making testing available to everyone and tracing contacts might be the gold standard towards the control of COVID-19, particularly when significant transmissions are without symptoms. This study evaluated the effectiveness of mass testing and contact tracing in the suppression of COVID-19 compared to conventional Test and Trace in the UK.

Design A rapid review of available evidence

Primary research question Is there evidence that mass testing and tracing could suppress community spread of SARS-CoV-2 infections better than Test and Trace?

Secondary research question What is the proportion of asymptomatic cases of SARS-CoV-2 reported during mass testing interventions?

Methods Literature was searched in September through December 2020 in Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Mendeley and PubMed.

Results Literature search yielded 286 articles from Google Scholar, 20 from Science Direct, 14 from Mendeley, 27 from Pubmed and 15 through manual search. Altogether 35 articles were included, making a sample size of close to a million participants.

Conclusion There was a very low level but promising evidence of 76.9% (95% CI: 46.2 – 95.0, P=0.09) majority vote in favour of the intervention under the primary objective. The overall proportion of asymptomatic cases among those tested positive and tested sample populations under the secondary objective was 40.7% (95% CI: 38.8– 42.5) and 0.01% (95% CI: 0.01 – 0.012) respectively. Conventional test and trace should be superseded by a decentralised and regular mass rapid testing and contact tracing, championed by GP surgeries and low cost community services.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No funding was recieved for this study

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

N/A

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

There is no additional data

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 15, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mass Testing with Contact Tracing Compared to Test and Trace for Effective Suppression of COVID-19 in the UK: A rapid review
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Mass Testing with Contact Tracing Compared to Test and Trace for Effective Suppression of COVID-19 in the UK: A rapid review
Mathew Mbwogge
medRxiv 2021.01.13.21249749; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.13.21249749
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Mass Testing with Contact Tracing Compared to Test and Trace for Effective Suppression of COVID-19 in the UK: A rapid review
Mathew Mbwogge
medRxiv 2021.01.13.21249749; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.13.21249749

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (238)
  • Allergy and Immunology (519)
  • Anesthesia (124)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1406)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (217)
  • Dermatology (158)
  • Emergency Medicine (291)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (580)
  • Epidemiology (10263)
  • Forensic Medicine (6)
  • Gastroenterology (525)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2611)
  • Geriatric Medicine (253)
  • Health Economics (495)
  • Health Informatics (1727)
  • Health Policy (788)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (669)
  • Hematology (266)
  • HIV/AIDS (563)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12066)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (647)
  • Medical Education (272)
  • Medical Ethics (83)
  • Nephrology (286)
  • Neurology (2448)
  • Nursing (143)
  • Nutrition (374)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (486)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (565)
  • Oncology (1314)
  • Ophthalmology (397)
  • Orthopedics (145)
  • Otolaryngology (235)
  • Pain Medicine (168)
  • Palliative Medicine (51)
  • Pathology (341)
  • Pediatrics (776)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (328)
  • Primary Care Research (294)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2390)
  • Public and Global Health (4987)
  • Radiology and Imaging (892)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (520)
  • Respiratory Medicine (680)
  • Rheumatology (307)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (253)
  • Sports Medicine (244)
  • Surgery (296)
  • Toxicology (45)
  • Transplantation (140)
  • Urology (108)