Abstract
Introduction Experts agree that male involvement (MI) in maternal health (MH) is a multifaceted concept, but a universal definition is lacking, hampering comparison of findings and interpretation of the literature. This systematic review aims to examine the conceptualization of MI in MH globally and critically review commonly used indicators.
Methods PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and CINAHL databases were searched for quantitative literature (between the years 2000 and 2020) containing indicators or variables representing MI in MH, which was defined as the involvement, participation, engagement or support of men in all activities related to maternal health.
Results After full text review, 282 studies were included in the review. Most studies were conducted in Africa (43%), followed by North America (23%), Asia (15%) and Europe (12%). Descriptive analysis and text mining analysis showed MI in MH has been conceptualised by focusing on two main aspects: psychosocial support and instrumental support for maternal health care utilisation. Differences in measurement and topics were noted according to continent with Africa focusing on HIV prevention, North America and Europe on psychosocial health and stress, and Asia on nutrition. One third of studies used one single indicator for assessing MI in MH and no common pattern of indicators could be identified. Antenatal care attendance was the most used indicator (40%) followed by financial support (17%), presence during childbirth (17%) and HIV testing (14%). Majority of studies did not collect data from men directly.
Discussion Researchers often focus on a single aspect of MI in MH, resulting in the usage of a narrow and simplified set of indicators. Aspects such as communication between the couple, shared decision making, participation in household tasks and the subjective feeling of being supported have received little attention. We believe a more multidimensional approach can broaden the potential of MI programs. Further research, involving experts and pilot testing, is recommended to develop consensus regarding a more robust and comprehensive set of valid and feasible indicators for assessing MI in MH.
What is already known?
Increasing male involvement (MI) in maternal health (MH) is considered to be a promising and effective intervention for improving maternal and newborn health outcomes.
Male involvement is described as a multifaceted concept in the quantitative literature, although a universal definition or evidence-based set of indicators is lacking.
In qualitative literature male involvement is often described by men and women from different settings as the male partner “being there”, meaning giving physical and emotional support.
What are the new findings?
Conceptualisation of MI in MH in the literature is done by focusing on either psychosocial aspects of MI in MH or on maternal health care utilisation. The attention given to one or both aspects resulted in the use of different indicators and depended on the geographical context of the study.
Overall male involvement was most often measured by instrumental actions such as presence at health services, financial support or providing transport. Other aspects of male involvement, such as communication, emotional support and shared decision making have received little attention, especially in low- and middle-income countries.
What do the new findings imply?
More research into other aspects of male involvement (such as the subjective feeling of perceived support and decision making) can broaden the potential of male involvement programs and also reveal and minimize potential negative side-effects of male involvement interventions.
A standardized definition and set of indicators, exploring different aspects of male involvement, could facilitate researchers to generate more robust findings, strengthening the existing evidence on male involvement programmes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
AG is funded by a VLADOC PhD scholarship from the Flemish Inter-University Council (VLIR-UOS Belgium). The funder had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript. Researchers are independent from funders and all authors had full access to all data (including statistical reports and tables) in the study and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Not required.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data analysed during the current study will be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- ANC
- Antenatal Care
- LDA
- Latent Dirichent Allocation
- Tf-Idf
- Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency
- LICs
- Low Income Countries
- LMICs
- Low and Middle Income Countries
- MNH
- Maternal and Newborn health
- PI
- Principle Investigator
- PMTCT
- Prevention of Mother To Child Transmission
- PSH
- Psychosocial Health
- WHO
- World Health Organisation