Abstract
BACKGROUND Venous thromboembolism (VTE) causes significant mortality and morbidity in hospitalised patients. In England, reporting the percentage of patients with a completed VTE risk assessment is mandated, but this does not include whether that risk assessment resulted in appropriate prescribing. Full guideline compliance (an assessment and action) is rarely reported. Education, audit and feedback enhance guideline compliance but electronic prescribing systems(EPS) can mandate guideline-compliant actions. We hypothesised that EPS-based interventions would increase full VTE guideline compliance more than other interventions.
METHODS All admitted patients within University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust were included for analysis between 2011-2020. The proportion of patients who received a fully compliant risk assessment and action was assessed over time. Interventions included face-to-face feedback based on measured performance (an individual approach) and mandatory risk assessment and prescribing rules into an EPS (a systems approach).
RESULTS Data from all 235,005 admissions and all 5503 prescribers were included in the analysis. Face-to-face feedback improved full VTE guideline concordance from 70% to 77% (p=<0.001). Changes to the EPS to mandate assessment with prescribing rules increased full VTE compliance to 95% (p=<0.001). Further amendments to the EPS system to reduce erroneous VTE assessments slightly reduced full compliance to 92% (p<0.001), but this was then maintained including during changes to the low molecular weight heparin used for VTE prophylaxis.
DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSION An EPS-systems approach was more effective in improving sustained guideline-compliant VTE prevention. Non-compliance was still not eradicated despite this mandated system and requires further research.
FUNDING HDR-UK Hub PIONEER
What is already known?Hospitalised patients are at an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for VTE are well known, there are established screening criteria and there is an effective prophylactic therapy, using low molecular weight heparin where indicated. Since 2010, NHS England has mandated the reporting of the percentage of patients with a completed VTE risk assessment. However, it does not automatically follow that completing a risk assessment leads to the appropriate action (prescribing and administering VTE prophylaxis where indicated). Currently it is unclear what percentage of patients have a guideline compliant VTE risk assessment and an associated action, or how full guideline compliance can be improved.
What does this paper add?First, this paper describes that a VTE risk assessment does not always lead to full VTE guideline compliance (an appropriate prescription and administration of heparin where indicated). This is currently not part of mandated reporting but potentially could lead to patient harm. Second, that Electronic Health Systems (EHS) can capture and interrogate guideline-associated risk assessments and prescribing, and be used to improve full guideline compliance, through a combination of individual feedback to prescribing outliers and mandated prescribing rules. These EPS-assisted systems are robust, and sustain guideline compliance through personnel and formulary changes.
Competing Interest Statement
P Nightingale, T Pankhurst, I Woolhouse, MA Berry, M Garrick report no conflicts of interest. S Gallier, A Topham and S Ball reports funding support from the HDRUK. E Sapey reports funding support from HDRUK, MRC, Wellcome Trust, NIHR, Alpha 1 Foundation, EPSRC and British Lung Foundation.
Clinical Trial
Retrospective data study
Funding Statement
This work was funded by a grant from HDR-UK as part of the funding for the PIONEER Data Hub and Better Care Programme.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This research was conducted under the ethical approvals of PIONEER, a Health data research hub in acute care (East Midlands Derby Research ethics committee, reference 20/EM/0158).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
To facilitate knowledge in this area, the anonymised participant data and a data dictionary defining each field will be available to others through application to PIONEER via the corresponding author.
