Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

A Scoping Review of the Experience of Implementing Population Testing for SARS-CoV-2

Clare R Foster, Fiona Campbell, Lindsay Blank, Anna Cantrell, Michelle Black, Andrew C K Lee
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.11.21249571
Clare R Foster
School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: clare.foster@sheffield.ac.uk
Fiona Campbell
School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lindsay Blank
School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Cantrell
School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle Black
School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew C K Lee
School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to the swift introduction of population testing programmes in many countries across the world, using testing modalities such as drive-through, walk-through, mobile and home visiting programmes. Here, we provide an overview of the literature describing the experience of implementing population testing for SARS-CoV-2.

Methods We conducted a scoping review using Embase, Medline and the Cochrane Library in addition to a grey literature search. We identified indicators relevant to process, quality and resource outcomes related to each testing modality.

Results 2,999 titles were identified from the academic literature and the grey literature search, of which 22 were relevant. Most studies were from the USA and the Republic of Korea. Drive-through testing centres were the most common testing modality evaluated and these provided a rapid method of testing whilst minimising resource use.

Conclusions The evidence base for population testing lacks high quality studies, however, the literature provides evaluations of the advantages and limitations of different testing modalities. There is a need for robust evidence in this area to ensure that testing is deployed in a safe and effective manner in response to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This review was part-funded by Public Health England

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

No ethical approval was needed

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

N/A

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 13, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Scoping Review of the Experience of Implementing Population Testing for SARS-CoV-2
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A Scoping Review of the Experience of Implementing Population Testing for SARS-CoV-2
Clare R Foster, Fiona Campbell, Lindsay Blank, Anna Cantrell, Michelle Black, Andrew C K Lee
medRxiv 2021.01.11.21249571; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.11.21249571
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A Scoping Review of the Experience of Implementing Population Testing for SARS-CoV-2
Clare R Foster, Fiona Campbell, Lindsay Blank, Anna Cantrell, Michelle Black, Andrew C K Lee
medRxiv 2021.01.11.21249571; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.11.21249571

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (70)
  • Allergy and Immunology (172)
  • Anesthesia (51)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (456)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (83)
  • Dermatology (55)
  • Emergency Medicine (160)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (192)
  • Epidemiology (5317)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (199)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (767)
  • Geriatric Medicine (81)
  • Health Economics (216)
  • Health Informatics (704)
  • Health Policy (364)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (224)
  • Hematology (100)
  • HIV/AIDS (166)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5971)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (368)
  • Medical Education (107)
  • Medical Ethics (25)
  • Nephrology (83)
  • Neurology (781)
  • Nursing (43)
  • Nutrition (135)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (147)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (237)
  • Oncology (483)
  • Ophthalmology (155)
  • Orthopedics (40)
  • Otolaryngology (98)
  • Pain Medicine (39)
  • Palliative Medicine (20)
  • Pathology (141)
  • Pediatrics (224)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (138)
  • Primary Care Research (99)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (868)
  • Public and Global Health (2051)
  • Radiology and Imaging (356)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (160)
  • Respiratory Medicine (288)
  • Rheumatology (96)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (75)
  • Sports Medicine (77)
  • Surgery (110)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (30)
  • Urology (40)