Assessment of fractional anisotropy outcomes in combat sport athletes with mild traumatic brain injury

1 Introduction

The practice of combat sports increases the risk of suffering white matter injuries (WMI), which modifies the pattern of diffusion of the affected area (Churchill et al., 2017b). Eighty percent of white matter injuries are classified as mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBI) (Langlois et al., 2006). The integrity of the white matter can be quantitatively characterized by diffusion tensor images (DTI) (King et al., 2019). This technique provides information on the diffusion of water molecules from different metrics usage such as fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, Axial diffusivity, and radial diffusivity. The fractional anisotropy (FA), which values vary between zero and one, is one of the most used parameters to characterize white matter lesions (Chang et al., 2017; Wilde et al., 2015). An FA coefficient close to one, occurs, when water molecules diffuse in a restricted medium like in the presence of membranes, filaments and myelin sheaths (anisotropic diffusion). In contrast, an FA coefficient close to zero, is observed, in the cerebrospinal fluid, where the water molecules diffuse in all directions (isotropic diffusion) with the same probability and speed (Koerte et al., 2015).

There is a contradiction in the consulted literature regarding the reported values of FA in subjects with white matter lesions. Some authors reported higher values of FA in sport injured athlete, rather than in sport healthy control athlete; while others revealed lower FA in sport injured athlete in comparison to non-athlete controls (Asken et al., 2018). The reason for conflicting diffusion direction (increased vs. decreased anisotropy) acutely/subacutely after sport-related concussion across studies is not entirely clear (Brett et al., 2019). We hypothesized that the apparent contradiction is caused by the coherence between the acute phase injuries and chronic phase ones. The objective of this study is to characterize clinically asymptomatic injuries in combat athletes (Boxing, Karate and Taekwondo) exposed to repetitive trauma. We also intend to detect changes in FA values between cerebral hemispheres with and without lesions. It is proposed a global and structural analysis of the hemispheres, as well as the selection of ROI in the lesions.

2 Material AND Methods

3 Results

FLAIR and T 2 images identified 18 white matter lesions and they were recorded by their hyperintense contrast Fig. 1. In general, the right hemisphere is more occupied with lesions than the left one. Diffusion tensor images were obtained to quantify FA in the hemispheres and in the lesions, utilizing global analyzes by structure and by selection of ROIs.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1:

Images of the subject CN0946-18. T1-weighted images (A), T2-weighted images (B), T 2^* susceptibility-weighted images (C) and FLAIR imaging (D). Yellow arrows point the lesions on FLAIR image.

The global analyzes, Fig. 2A, revealed maximum values of FA_med(Healthy) = 0.403± 0.007 while the lowest values were reported in the cerebrospinal fluid FA_med(In jured) = 0.163 ±0.037, Table 1. No significant differences were detected between the hemispheres of subjects with and without injuries. There were either statistically significant differences between hemispheres of the both group Table 1. This method presents an accuracy index=0.479.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2:

Analysis of the hemispheres with lesions. In the global analyzes (A) the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) present in the lateral ventricles and white matter (WM). The Genu of Corpus Callosum (GCC), Splenium of Corpus Callosum (SGG), Anterior Corona Radiata (ACR), Posterior (PCR), Superior (SCR) Anterior Limb of Internal Capsule (ALIC), Inferior Fronto-Occipital Fasciculos (IFOF) and Superior Longitudinal Fasciculos (SLF) used for the analysis by structures (B).(C) Analysis of Regions of Interest (ROIs).

The values of FA_med in the analyzed structures, Fig. 2B, had higher mean values than those obtained in the global analyzes Table 2, consistently with the largest organization of white matter in structures. The highest values of FA_med(Healthy) = 0.678± 0.019 are found in the SCC and the lowest FA_med(In jured) = 0.392 ± 0.021 is located in the left IFOF. Structural analyzes do not detect differences between hemispheres with and without injuries; except in the case of the ACR Table 2. This method presents an accuracy index_med = 0.396.

Manually selected ROIs measurements were done on the diffusion maps Fig. 2C. 18 ROIs of the lesions, which mean volume is 0.011cc were marked. From those, 14 with statistical values of FA_med = 0.271±0.057 similar to the cerebrospinal fluid. In contrast, four ROIs with FA_med = 0.454 ± 0.062 were detected. Both types of ROI, with significant FA value differences of p=8.829× 10⁻¹³, coexist in three subjects.

These ROIs marked by a Star Symbol Table 3 were classified as atypical since they presented FA values that exceed the FA_med (Injured) of the white matter. The mean volumes of the structural ROIs, hemispheres, ventricles and ROIs of lesions were calculated using the three techniques (Supplementary Material Table [S2]). The same procedures were performed to quantify the FA confidence intervals (Supplementary Material Table [S3]). Finally, it was compared the white matter and cerebrospinal fluid FA values of subjects with lesions, including the two types of ROIs found, Fig. 3.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3:

Comparison of FA values in injured subjects on White Matter, Cerebroespinal fluid and ROIs in left (A) and right (B) hemispheres. Star Symbol represents the ROIs with FA>WM). Significant differences (p^* < 0.005; p^** < 0.001).

4 Discussion

The present study demonstrates that the global and structural analyzes do not identify differences in the FA_med values of the injured hemispheres, despite the existence of marked variances between both injured hemispheres. The uneven distribution of injuries is either detected when comparing the means of the FA between the hemispheres of injured subjects with respect to healthy subjects.

The global analysis of the hemispheres did not result in a sensible test since the average volume of the lesions represents 0.005% (Supplementary Material Table [S2]) of the right average volume and, 0.006% of the left average volume of the white matter in injured hemispheres. This fact masks differences between subjects with and without lesions as the volume of the lesions is negligible in respect to the volume of the hemispheres. Therefore, the values of FA in lesions do not significantly contribute to the global FA mean in the hemispheres, unlike the results found by Kikinis Z (Kikinis et al., 2017), who detected considerable lesion volume with respect to the volume of the hemisphere in animals with recent lesions. However, Zhang L (Zhang et al., 2006) found that after a month of sustaining a concussion, injured athletes did not differ from non-concussed athlete controls FA on the whole-brain.

Although the structural analyzes allow a greater approach to the location of the lesions, it does not constitute a sensitive test since lesions are asymptomatic; so, the location of the possible damaged structures are exactly unknown. In the studied samples, the impacts were in different areas, thus the position of the lesions is ‘unique’ in each subject. In the ACR selected structures, there were noteworthy differences between healthy and injured subjects. SLF showed higher FA_med (injured) in the right hemisphere while Meier T (Meier et al., 2016) reported an increase of the FA_med in the left hemisphere. The results of the GCC, FA_med(in jured < Healthy) contradicts what was found by Ware (Ware et al., 2020). Lastly, in the ACR FA_med(in jured < Healthy) in both hemispheres, resulted similar to the ones stated by Yin B (Yin et al., 2019); he only reported a decrease of the FA values in the left hemispheres of injured subjects, though. In all structures, the percentage that represents the volume of the lesions is greater than in the case of the global analyzes (Supplementary Material Table [S2]), so that the contribution of the lesions to the FA increases.

In global and structural techniques, it is observed that the presence of lesions increases the coefficients of variation of the FA (Supplementary Material Table [S3]). This implies that the trends of the mean do not change but their deviation standard. Therefore, global and structural analyzes detect the presence of lesions based on variations in the standard deviation. These analyzes are not reliable as the unique criterion for determining the presence or absence of asymptomatic lesions, due to the unawareness of occurrence time and impact zone. In those tests, accuracy index below 0.5 were obtained, showing its low sensitivity to the presence of lesions (Supplementary Material Table [S4]).

Unlike the previous techniques, with the selection of ROIs, a maximum approximation for the location of the lesions is obtained. As a further result, ROIs were found with atypical FA values that exceed the FA_med of the white matter. Several authors have observed this pattern in the first days after a mild traumatic brain injury occurred (Churchill et al., 2017a; Wallace et al., 2018). No relationship was found between atypical FA values and the volume of the selected ROIs. Other authors reported that FA follows a decreasing trend in subjects with lesions of four years or more (Niogi et al., 2008). Figure 3 shows lesions in the two phases of their temporal evolution. The acute phase, lesions manifest FA values, which exceed the mean white matter FA, herein indicated with a Star Symbol. The presence of chronic phase lesions is evident, which FA values is similar to the media values of the cerebrospinal fluid. This suggests that the injuries were made at different times and therefore, their evolution is at different stages. According to that, the apparent contradiction with respect to the FA values in the white matter referred by Asken B. and Brett (Asken et al., 2018; Brett et al., 2019) are solved. These findings should be added to the list of factors involved in the conflict diffusion direction (increased vs. decreased anisotropy) acutely/subacutely mentioned by Dodd AB (Dodd et al., 2014).

5 Conclusion

In the consulted literature, the apparently contradictory results in the FA values are related to the stage of the lesions. The reported analysis in the referred studies are either global, structures or selection of ROIs, rather than using the three methods simultaneously. The present study found that there were not previous report of both lesions (acute and/or chronic) in the same subject. In spite of our knowledge that there is evidence of injures in the studied subjects, the global and structural analyzes mask those results; therefore, we do not recommend these types of analysis for determining the existence of lesions. Global and structural analyzes should be used as a complement to the MR images when the presence of lesions, their location and/or the time elapsed is not known a priori. It has been demonstrated that, the best criterion for the analysis of the hemispheres with lesions, is the selection of ROIs lesions, as it permits a better location of the lesion and improves the estimation of FA values, allowing a local analysis of the lesion and the concurrence of acute and chronic phase lesions cohesion in the same subject.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declared that they had no conflicts of interest with respect to their authorship or the publication of this article. No competing financial interests exist.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed intellectually to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.

Data Availability Statement

The [GENERATED / ANALYZED] data sets for this study can be requested at [evelio.gonzalez{at}cneuro.edu.cu].