Abstract
Objective To compare the accuracy, sensitivity and utility of brief screening to predictive modeling for identifying suicide-related outcomes in a pediatric emergency department. Our hypothesis was that predictive modeling would be more accurate and useful compared to brief screening.
Methods This was a retrospective cohort study at an urban pediatric Emergency Department (PED) in the United States. Patients were aged 8 to 18 years old who presented from January 1, 2017 to June 30, 2019. Predictors included positive suicide risk screen and/or demographic, medical and mental health diagnostic Electronic Health Record (EHR) data at the time of visit. The main outcome was subsequent PED visit with suicide-related presenting problem (i.e. ideation or attempt) within a 3-month follow-up period.
Results Of the N=13420 individuals, n=141 had a subsequent suicide-related ED visit. Approximately 63% identified as Black Non-Hispanic. Results showed that a model based only on EHR data performed only slightly worse than the ASQ alone. Combining ASQ screening and EHR data resulted in a 17.4% improvement in sensitivity and 13.4% increase in AUC compared to the ASQ alone. The LASSO models indicated a diagnosis of major depressive disorder in addition to the ASQ improved the AUC by 9%.
Conclusions, Implications, Future Directions Our findings show that EHR data is helpful either in the absence or as an addition to brief suicide screening. To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare brief screening to EHR based predictive modeling and adds to our understanding of how best to identify youth at risk of suicidal behaviors in clinical care settings.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Author E.E.H. is supported by NIMH grant number: K01MH116335. Authors HK, CK, PSN and HCW are supported by NIMH grants R01MH124724 and R56MH117560. Author P.S.N. is supported by the James Wah Foundation for Mood Disorders Research and the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Institutional Review Board
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data is not available publically.
