Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Quantifying the online news media coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic

K. Krawczyk, T. Chelkowski, S. Mishra, D. Xifara, B. Gibert, D.J. Laydon, View ORCID ProfileS. Flaxman, T. Mellan, V. Schwämmle, R. Röttger, J.T. Hadsund, S. Bhatt
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.24.20248813
K. Krawczyk
1Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: konradk@imada.sdu.dk bhattsamir@gmail.com
T. Chelkowski
2Department of Management in the Network Society, Kozminski University, Warsaw, Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Mishra
3Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Xifara
4Nupinion, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Gibert
4Nupinion, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.J. Laydon
3Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Flaxman
5Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. Flaxman
T. Mellan
5Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
V. Schwämmle
6Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Röttger
1Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.T. Hadsund
1Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Bhatt
3Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: konradk@imada.sdu.dk bhattsamir@gmail.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Non-pharmaceutical interventions such as lockdowns, mask wearing and social distancing have been the primary measures to effectively combat the COVID-19 pandemic. Such measures are highly effective when there is strong population wide adherence which needs to be facilitated by information on the current risks posed by the pandemic alongside a clear exposition of the rules and guidelines in place. Here we address the issue of communication on the pandemic by offering data and analysis of online news media coverage of COVID-19.

Methods We collected 26 million news articles from the front pages of 172 major online news sources in 11 countries (available at http://sciride.org). Using topic detection we identified COVID-19-related content to quantify the proportion of total coverage pandemic received in 2020. Sentiment analysis tool Vader was employed to stratify the emotional polarity of COVID-19 reporting. Further topic detection and sentiment analysis was performed on COVID-19 articles to reveal the leading themes in pandemic reporting and their respective emotional polarizations.

Findings We find that COVID-19 coverage accounted for approximately 25% of all front-page online news articles between January and October 2020. Sentiment analysis of English-speaking sources reveals that the overall COVID-19 coverage cannot be simply classified as negative due to the disease subject matter, suggesting a wide heterogeneous reporting of the pandemic. Within this heterogenous coverage, 16% of COVID-19 news articles (or 4% of all English-speaking articles) can be classified as highly negatively polarized, citing issues such as death, fear or crisis.

Interpretation The goal of pandemic public health communication is to increase understanding of distancing rules and maximize the impact of any governmental policy. Our results suggest an information overload in COVID-19 reporting that could risk obscuring effective policy communication. We hope that our data and analysis will inform health communication strategy to minimize the risks of COVID-19 while vaccination regimes are being introduced.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

SB would like to acknowledge the BMGF, the Academy of Medical Sciences, The NIHR BRC and the UKRI. We would also like to acknowledge Microsoft AI for health and Amazon AWS for computing resources.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

not applicable

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

We make the collected online news article data available via our website at http://sciride.org.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 27, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Quantifying the online news media coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Quantifying the online news media coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic
K. Krawczyk, T. Chelkowski, S. Mishra, D. Xifara, B. Gibert, D.J. Laydon, S. Flaxman, T. Mellan, V. Schwämmle, R. Röttger, J.T. Hadsund, S. Bhatt
medRxiv 2020.12.24.20248813; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.24.20248813
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Quantifying the online news media coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic
K. Krawczyk, T. Chelkowski, S. Mishra, D. Xifara, B. Gibert, D.J. Laydon, S. Flaxman, T. Mellan, V. Schwämmle, R. Röttger, J.T. Hadsund, S. Bhatt
medRxiv 2020.12.24.20248813; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.24.20248813

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (216)
  • Allergy and Immunology (495)
  • Anesthesia (106)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1096)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (196)
  • Dermatology (141)
  • Emergency Medicine (274)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (502)
  • Epidemiology (9773)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (481)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2313)
  • Geriatric Medicine (223)
  • Health Economics (462)
  • Health Informatics (1561)
  • Health Policy (736)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (603)
  • Hematology (238)
  • HIV/AIDS (504)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11650)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (617)
  • Medical Education (238)
  • Medical Ethics (67)
  • Nephrology (257)
  • Neurology (2144)
  • Nursing (134)
  • Nutrition (337)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (427)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (518)
  • Oncology (1180)
  • Ophthalmology (364)
  • Orthopedics (128)
  • Otolaryngology (220)
  • Pain Medicine (146)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (311)
  • Pediatrics (695)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (300)
  • Primary Care Research (267)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2182)
  • Public and Global Health (4661)
  • Radiology and Imaging (778)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (457)
  • Respiratory Medicine (624)
  • Rheumatology (274)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (226)
  • Sports Medicine (210)
  • Surgery (252)
  • Toxicology (43)
  • Transplantation (120)
  • Urology (94)