Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Support and follow-up needs of patients discharged from Intensive Care after severe COVID-19: a mixed-methods study of the views of UK general practitioners and intensive care staff during the pandemic’s first wave

View ORCID ProfileAna Castro-Avila, View ORCID ProfileLaura Jefferson, View ORCID ProfileVeronica Dale, View ORCID ProfileKaren Bloor
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.23.20248798
Ana Castro-Avila
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ana Castro-Avila
  • For correspondence: ana.castro@york.ac.uk
Laura Jefferson
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Laura Jefferson
Veronica Dale
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Veronica Dale
Karen Bloor
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Karen Bloor
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background After discharge from an intensive care unit(ICU), over 50% of patients face significant physical, mental and cognitive problems. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a large cohort of these patients who will need follow-up services that can address their support needs.

Objectives To identify follow-up services planned for COVID-19 patients discharged from ICU, and to explore the views of ICU staff and General Practitioners(GPs) regarding these patients’ future needs and care coordination.

Design Sequential mixed-methods UK study. We explored usual follow-up practice after ICU discharge and changes in follow-up during the pandemic through a survey of ICU staff, and GP awareness of follow-up and support needs of patients discharged from ICU through a survey of GPs. Through these surveys, we identified participants for semi-structured interviews with both groups.

Results We obtained 170 survey responses and conducted 23 interviews. Over 60% of GPs were unaware of the follow-up services generally provided by their local hospitals, and whether or not these were functioning during the pandemic. Eighty percent of ICUs reported some form of follow-up services, with 25% of these suspending provision during the peak of the pandemic, and over half modifying their provision (usually to provide the service remotely). Complex funding streams, poor communication between primary and secondary care, and lack of clarity about who was responsible for referrals and follow-up were the most common problems identified. Discharge documentation was described as poor and lacking key information. Both groups mentioned difficulties accessing services in the community.

Conclusions The pandemic has highlighted long-standing issues of continuity of care and complex funding streams for post-ICU follow-up care. The large cohort of ICU patients admitted due to COVID-19 highlights the need for improved follow-up services and communication between specialists and GPs, not only for COVID-19 patients, but for all those discharged from ICU.

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • This is the first study exploring NHS staff views of post-ICU follow-up services to support patients recovering from severe COVID-19.

  • Responses to our survey had good geographic spread but were limited in number and relied on volunteers.

  • GP interviews were small in number, but our findings align with those of larger studies conducted before the pandemic.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This article is independent research commissioned and funded by the NIHR Policy Review Programme through the Partnership for Responsive Policy Analysis and Research (PREPARE), grant number NIHR 200702.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This project was reviewed and approved by the Department of Health Ethics Committee at the University of York

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data from the interviews and survey responses are available upon reasonable request

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 26, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Support and follow-up needs of patients discharged from Intensive Care after severe COVID-19: a mixed-methods study of the views of UK general practitioners and intensive care staff during the pandemic’s first wave
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Support and follow-up needs of patients discharged from Intensive Care after severe COVID-19: a mixed-methods study of the views of UK general practitioners and intensive care staff during the pandemic’s first wave
Ana Castro-Avila, Laura Jefferson, Veronica Dale, Karen Bloor
medRxiv 2020.12.23.20248798; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.23.20248798
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Support and follow-up needs of patients discharged from Intensive Care after severe COVID-19: a mixed-methods study of the views of UK general practitioners and intensive care staff during the pandemic’s first wave
Ana Castro-Avila, Laura Jefferson, Veronica Dale, Karen Bloor
medRxiv 2020.12.23.20248798; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.23.20248798

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (63)
  • Allergy and Immunology (145)
  • Anesthesia (47)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (420)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (74)
  • Dermatology (49)
  • Emergency Medicine (148)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (176)
  • Epidemiology (4910)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (185)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (691)
  • Geriatric Medicine (73)
  • Health Economics (193)
  • Health Informatics (637)
  • Health Policy (325)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (209)
  • Hematology (87)
  • HIV/AIDS (157)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5416)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (335)
  • Medical Education (96)
  • Medical Ethics (24)
  • Nephrology (77)
  • Neurology (692)
  • Nursing (42)
  • Nutrition (115)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (130)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (211)
  • Oncology (448)
  • Ophthalmology (140)
  • Orthopedics (36)
  • Otolaryngology (91)
  • Pain Medicine (37)
  • Palliative Medicine (18)
  • Pathology (132)
  • Pediatrics (203)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (131)
  • Primary Care Research (88)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (789)
  • Public and Global Health (1833)
  • Radiology and Imaging (328)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (142)
  • Respiratory Medicine (260)
  • Rheumatology (88)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (69)
  • Sports Medicine (63)
  • Surgery (102)
  • Toxicology (23)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (39)